Teachers' Perspectives Towards Equipping Pupils with Phonological Awareness to Improve English Proficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v6n1.84Abstract
The implementation of LINUS 2.0 LBI (Linus Bahasa Inggeris) programme saw the rise of phonological awareness in the Malaysian education system. Many researchers are of the view that phonological awareness helps young pupils to improve their English proficiency. However, there are also educators who do not adhere to this belief. Therefore, this article aims to discover teachers’ perspectives towards equipping young pupils with phonological awareness to improve their English performance. It focuses on teachers’ readiness to teach phonological awareness and conducting the LINUS 2.0 LBI programme, the effect of phonological awareness on pupils’ English proficiency, the challenges that are encountered by teaachers while implementing phonological awareness and conducting the LINUS 2.0 LBI programme, and the views of English Language teachers towards phonological awareness skills. In order to collect the data, a mixed method research design was used. 38 teachers answered an online questionnaire in order to discover their readiness to teach phonological awareness. The official LINUS 2.0 LBI results from the year 2015 until 2017 of one of the schools in Johor Bahru area were also collected in order to gauge the effectiveness of phonological awareness instruction while interviews were conducted with one foreign and seven local teachers in order to discover their views regarding phonological awareness and the challenges while implementing it in class. The findings revealed that the teachers were fully prepared to teach the skill and were able to produce positive outcomes despite the challenges they faced when implementing it.
References
Atwill, K., Blanchard, J., Gorin, J., & Burstein, K. 2007. Receptive Vocabulary and Cross- Language Transfer of Phonemic Awareness in Kindergarten Children. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(6): 336-345. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27548202.
Azman, H. 2016. Implementation and Challenges of English Language Education Reform in Malaysian Primary Schools. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies. 65-78.
Bhat, P., Griffin, C., & Sindelar, P. 2003. Phonological Awareness Instruction for Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. 26(2): 73-87. doi:10.2307/1593591.
Biedroń, A., & Szczepaniak, A. 2012. Working Memory and Short-Term Memory Abilities in Accomplished Multilinguals. The Modern Language Journal. 96(2): 290-306. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41684074.
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., Goldstiein, H., & Martin, C. 2003. Are Class Size Differences Related to Pupils' Educational Progress and Classroom Process? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of Children Aged 5-7 Years. British Educational Research Journal. 29(5): 709-730. Retrieved from http://eprints.ioe.ac.uk/1341/1/Blatchford2003Are709.pdf.
Bokhari, R., Rashid, S. M., & Heng, C. S. 2015. Teachers’ Perception on the Implementation of the Literacy,Numeracy and Screening (LINUS LBI 2.0) Programmeme among Lower Primary ESL Pupils. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research. 11(1): 108-121.
Brühwiler, C., & Blatchford, P. 2011. Effects of Class Size and Adaptive Teaching Competency on Classroom Processes and Academic Outcome. Learning and Instruction. 21(1): 95-108.
Chan, A., & Li, D. 2000. English and Cantonese Phonology in Contrast: Explaining Cantonese ESL Learners' English Pronunciation Problems. Language Culture and Curriculum. 13(1): 67-75.
Chen, K. S. 2012, September 5. LINUS Programmeme for Early Learning. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from The Star Online: https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2012/09/05/linus-programmeme-for-early- learning/.
Creswell, J. W. 2012. Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
DePlanty, J., R., C., and K., D. 2006. Perceptions of Parent Involvement in Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Research. 100(6): 361-368.
Dixon, L., Zhao, J., & Joshi, R. 2010. Influence of L1 Orthography on Spelling English Words by Bilingul Children: A Natural Experiment Comparing Syllabic, Phonological and Morphosyllabic First Languages. Learning Disability Quarterly. 33(3): 211-221. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25701449.
Ehri, L., Nunes, S., Willows, D., Schuster, B., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. 2001. Phonemic Awareness Instruction Helps Children Learn to Read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel's Meta-Analysis. Reading Research Quarterly. 36: 250-287.
Fukkink, R., Hulstijn, J., & Simis, A. 2005. Does Training in Second-Language Word Recognition Skills Affect Reading Comprehension? An Experimental Study. The Modern Language Journal. 89(1): 54-75. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3588551.
Griffith, P., & Olson, M. 1992. Phonemic Awareness Helps Beginning Readers Break the Code. The Reading Teacher, 45(7): 516-523. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20200912.
Hadzir, N., Alias, A., Kamaruzaman, A. L., & Mohd Yusof, H. M. 2016. Teachers' Perception on Literacy, Numeracy and Screening (LINUS 2.0) Assessment Features Based on Year 1 Students' Performance. Research Journal of English Language and Literature(RJELAL). 40-47.
Harris, A., and Goodall, J. 2008. Do Parents Know They Matter? Engaging All Parents in Learning. Educational Research. 50(3): 277-289.
Hesse-Biber, & Nagy, S. 2010. Mixed Methods Research: Merging Theory with Practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
HOLME, R. 2012. Cognitive Linguistics and the Second Language Classroom. TESOL Quarterly. 46(1): 6-29. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41576027.
Johnson, R., & Tweedie, M. 2010. Could Phonemic Awareness Instruction Be (Part of) the Answer for Young EFL Learners? A Report on the Early Literacy Project in Malaysia. TESOL Quarterly. 44(4): 822-829. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27896769.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. 2004. Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come. Educational Researcher. 14(26): 14-26.
Johnson, R. B. & Onswuegbuzie, A. J. 2004. Validity Issues in Mixed Methods Research. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
Keesey, S., Konrad, M., & Joseph, L. M. 2015. Word Boxes Improve Phonemic Awareness, Letter-Sound Correspondences, and Spelling Skills of At-Risk Kindergartners. Remedial and Special Education. 36: 167-180.
Kurikulum, B. P. 2011. Buku Panduan dan PengoperasianProgramme Literasi dan Numerasi (LINUS). Putrajaya: Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.
Lewis, C. L. 2008. Teachers’ Knowledge of English Phonology and Attitudes toward Reading Instruction as Related to Student Outcomes. RIT Scholar Works. 1-54.
Liem, G., Marsh, H., Martin, A., McInerney, D., & Yeung, A. 2013. The Big-Fish-Little- Pond Effect and a National Policy of within-School Ability Streaming: Alternative Frames of Reference. American Educational Research Journal. 50(2): 326-370. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/23526144.
Luyee, E. O., Roselan, F. I., Anwardeen, N., Mohd Mustapha, F. H. 2015. Suitability of the Literacy and Numeracy Screening (Linus) 2.0 Programmeme in Assessing Children’s early Literacy. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science. 3(2): 36-44. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085912.pdf.
Marsh, H. W. 2006. Self-concept Theory, Measurement and Research into Practice: The Role of Self Concept in Educational Psychology. Vernon-Wall Lecture: British Psychological Society.
McDowell, H., & Lorch, M. 2008. Phonemic Awareness in Chinese L1 Readers of English: Not Simply an Effect of Orthography. TESOL Quarterly. 42(3): 495-513. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40264480.
Menteri, J. P. 2011. Goverment Transformational Programme: Annual Report 2011. Putrajaya: Performance Management and Delivery Unit.
Miller, G. A. 2014. Classroom Preparation, Readiness, Strategies. Waynesboro: Lulu.com.
Nasir, B. 2014, September 2014. Further Strengthening English Language Learning. Retrieved April 3, 2017, from New Straits Times: https://www.nst.com.my/news/2015/09/further-strengthening-english-language- learning.
Newman, I., & McNeil, K. A. 1998. Conducting Survey Research in the Social Sciences. Lanham: University Press of America, Inc.
Nye B., Hedges, L.V. & Konstantopoulos, S. 2000. The Effects of Small Classes on Academic Achievement: The Results of the Tennessee Class Size Experiment. American Educational Research Journal. 37(1): 123-151.
Sekel, P. P. 2003. The Phonemic Awareness Knowledge and Skills of First-Grade Teachers: A Sound Investment? 1-119.
Silverman, R. D., Barber, A. T., Doyle, C. B., & Templeton, S. 2016. Vocabulary Instruction for English Learners across the Elementary Grades. In L. Helman, Literacy Development with English Learners, Second Edition: Research-Based Instruction in Grades K-6. New York: Guilford Publications. 232-257.
Singh, K. 2007. Quantitative Social Research Methods. New Delhi: Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd.
Snider, V. 1997. The Relationship between Phonemic Awareness and Later Reading Achievement. The Journal of Educational Research. 90(4): 203-211. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/27542094.
Stronge, J. H. 2007. Qualities of Effective Teachers. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Swanson, H., Trainin, G., Necoechea, D., & Hammill, D. 2003. Rapid Naming, Phonological Awareness, and Reading: A Meta-Analysis of the Correlation Evidence. Review of Educational Research. 73(4): 407-440. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3515998.
Tchoshanov, M. 2011. Relationship between Teacher Knowledge of Concepts and Connections, Teaching Practice, and Student Achievement in Middle Grades Mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 76(2): 141-164. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41485895.
Torres-Fernandez, D. I. 2008. Gender Differences in Working Memory and Phonological Awareness. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing. 1-15.
Yopp, H., & Yopp, R. 2000. Supporting Phonemic Awareness Development in the Classroom. The Reading Teacher. 54(2): 130-143. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20204888.
Zohar, A. 2006. The Nature and Development of Teachers' Metastrategic Knowledge in the Context of Teaching Higher Order Thinking. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 15(3): 331-377.
