PAVEMENT DESIGN FOR THIN BITUMINOUS LAYER AND GREENHOUSE GAS BENEFIT

Authors

  • Swapan Kumar Bagui Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrat Private Limited., A- 8 Green Park, New Delhi
  • Atasi Das Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrat Private Limited., A- 8 Green Park, New Delhi
  • Tanmoy Das Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrat Private Limited., A- 8 Green Park, New Delhi
  • Anukul Saxena Intercontinental Consultants and Technocrat Private Limited., A- 8 Green Park, New Delhi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15592

Keywords:

Region of interest (ROI), Speed-up Robust Features (SURF), Hue Saturation Value (HSV), Pavement, bituminous layer, fatigue

Abstract

Bituminous layer thickness is determined based on fatigue life and granular layer thickness is determined based on rut life. Higher bituminous thickness is required for increasing the fatigue life in pavement design thus increasing the project cost as well. In order to reduce project cost in some cases and places, fatigue life is not considered and pavement is allowed to design for rut life only and minimum bituminous layer is provided for protecting granular layer to avoid early distress. It depends on country practices and local experience. Cement treated sub base with granular base may be provided with thin bituminous surfacing of 40 - 90 mm to economize the project cost. This paper presents the development of Pavement design chart for thin surfacing and compare with conventional thickness and cost for few hypothetical case studies. Carbon credit is also compared for both cases. It is found from the case study that thin surfacing entails 20 % less cost and 28 % reduction of greenhouse gas (GHS) emissions compared to conventional pavement design.

References

AASHTO (1993). Pavement Design Guideline Gribble, M., Patrick, J. 2008. Adaptation of the AUSTROADS Pavement Design Guide for New Zealand conditions. Land Transport New Zealand Research Report 305. 72pp.

Austroads (2004). A Guide to the Structural Design of Road Pavements. Pavement Design Guide for New Zealand conditions

Austroads (2010). Part 2, Guideline for Pavement Design. Pavement Design Guide for New Zealand conditions

ERA NET –ROAD (2011). Danish Pavement Design Software.

Gribble M. & Patrick J. (2008), Adaptation of the AUSTROADS Pavement Design Guide for New Zealand Conditions

IRC: 37-2012. Tentative Guideline for New Pavement Design.

IRC: SP: 20 (2002), Indian Road Congress, Special Publication 20, Rural Road Manuals, published by The Indian Road Congress

Papadopoulos, E. and Santamarina, J. (2014). “Optimization of Inverted Base Pavement Designs with Thin Asphalt Surfacingâ€. Geo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers: pp. 2996-3004.

Sahoo, U., Ahmed, S., and Reddy, K. (2014) Long-Term Performance Evaluation of Rural Road Pavements in India. Design, Analysis, and Asphalt Material Characterization for Road and Airfield Pavements: pp. 91-98.

Theyse H. L., De Beer M., and Rust F. C. (2011). “Overview of South African Mechanistic Pavement Design Methodâ€.

Werkmeister, S., Canon Falla, G., and Oeser, M. (2015). “Analytical Design Methodology for Thin Surfaced Asphalt Pavements in Germanyâ€. Airfield and Highway Pavements 2015: pp. 730-741.

World Bank (2011), ROADEO-Road Emission Optimisation- A Toolkit for Greenhouse Gas Emissions Mitigation in Road Construction and Rehabilitation, January 2011, World Bank

Downloads

Published

2018-01-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

PAVEMENT DESIGN FOR THIN BITUMINOUS LAYER AND GREENHOUSE GAS BENEFIT. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15592