INTERPRETATION OF CONCRETE MIX DESIGNS BY SURFACE HARDNESS METHOD

Authors

  • Balakrishna M.N. School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, United Kingdom
  • Fouad Mohammad School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, United Kingdom
  • Robert Evans School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, United Kingdom
  • Rahman M.M. School of Architecture, Design and the Built Environment, Faculty of Engineering, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, NG1 4FQ, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15600

Keywords:

Concrete, non-destructive testing, Schmidt hammer test, water-cement ratio, grades of concrete, slump, compressive strength

Abstract

The Structural Health monitoring with Schmidt Rebound Hammer is being widely used by many consultants. The rebound hammer is use for Concrete structures for predicting the service life. The present research work attempted to interpret different Concrete mix designs by Surface hardness method, which gives a test method for structural health assessment by a suitable correlation between Rebound hammer number and Concrete compressive strength. Thus, the objectives of this present research are threefold. First, this research will examine the influence of conditioning such as drying condition on the results of Schmidt hammer test performed on Concrete cubes with different Mixtures proportion. In which W/C ratio, Slump, Grade of concrete, Fine aggregate, Coarse aggregate, Cement content, and Water content under two different conditions such as Slump, and W/C ratio value was varied with constant Compressive strength as in the First case and Compressive strength, and W/C ratio value varied with constant Slump as in the Second case. Seventy-two concrete cubes (100 mm3) with Grades of concrete ranges from 25 to 40 N/mm2 were prepared and tested using Schmidt Rebound hammer equipment. The non-destructive test parameters were relate to different Mixtures proportion in ordered to characterize Mix designs. Second, this research will examine the influence of the hardness value on compressive strength. Third, this research will also aims to develop non-destructive charts for different concrete mixtures proportion. Thus, the Schmidt hammer test due to the developed chart gave a better value. This implied that the developed chart was more suitable for normal strength concrete as well as minimising inaccuracy in non-destructive tests.

References

Brinell, J.A. (1901). Steel ball test report (Mémoire sur les épreuves à bille en acier). Communications presentés devant le congrés international des méthodes d’essai des matériaux de construction. 2:83–94 [in French].

BS 1881 (1986), British Standard BS 1881-202:1986. Testing concrete-Recommendations for surface hardness testing by rebound hammer. Corbett, D. (2011). Advancing the Rebound Hammer Method: A New Concrete Test Hammer,RILEM Book series, 149-154.

Crepps, R.B., and Mills, R.E. (1923). Ball test applied to cement mortar and concrete. Bulletin No 12. Engineering experiment station. LaFayette, Indiana: Purdue University: p. 32.

Gaede, K. A. (1934). New method of strength testing of concrete in structures. Bauing, 35–36(15):356–7 [in German].

Hertz, H., and Reine Angew Math, J. (1881). About the contact of elastic solid bodies, 5:12–23 [in German]. Kristine S., and Nathaniel T. (2014). Reliability of Rebound Hammer Test in Concrete Compressive Strength Estimation, Int'l Journal of Advances in Agricultural & Environmental Engg, 1, Issue 2, ISSN 2349-1523, EISSN 2349-1531. Leshchinsky, A. (1991). Non-destructive methods Instead of specimens and cores, quality control of concrete structures, in: L.aerwe, H. Lambotte (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium held by RILEM, Belgium, E&FN SPON, U.K, 377-386.

Lin, I.-C. (1999). The Test Concrete Strength the Non-Destruction Test Technology, the Taiwan area mixes the concrete industry trade association published conference proceeding in advance, 23-25. Liu J.C, Sue M.L., and Kou C.H. (2009). Estimating the Strength of Concrete Using Surface Rebound Value and Design Parameters of Concrete Material, Tamkang Journal of Science and Engineering, 12(1): 1-7.

Schmidt, E. (1950). Rebound hammer for concrete testing. Schweiz Bauztg. 68 (28): 378–9 [in German].

Skramtajew, B.G. (1938). Determining concrete strength in control for concrete in structures. J Am Concr Inst, 9(3): 285–303 [Proceedings V.34].

Szymanski, A., and Szymanski, J.M. (1989). Hardness estimation of minerals, rocks and ceramic materials. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 330. Tarun G., Sankhla, S.S., and Akash G. (2016). Study of Concrete Quality Assessment of Structural Elements Using Rebound Hammer Test, American Journal of Engineering Research, e-ISSN: 2320-0847 p-ISSN: 2320-0936, 5, Issue-8, 192-198. Teychenné, D. C., Franklin, R. E., and Erntroy, H.C. (1988). Design of normal concrete mixes, Second edition, BRE. Turgut, P. (2004). Research into the Correlation between Concrete Strength and UPV Values. The e-J. Nondestr. Test, 12. Yilmaz, I. (2009). A new testing method for indirect determination of the unconfined Compressive strength of rocks. Inter. J. Rock Mech. Mining Sci., 46 (8):1349-1357. Yüksel, I. (1995). Determination of concrete strength using combined non-destructive tests and application on a reinforced concrete structure. MSc. Thesis, Yildiz Technic University, Science of Technology Institute, Istanbul.

Downloads

Published

2018-01-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

INTERPRETATION OF CONCRETE MIX DESIGNS BY SURFACE HARDNESS METHOD. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15600