MODELING DISPUTE MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Chai Chang Saar Department of Structure and Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor
  • Loo Siaw Chuing Centre of Building, Construction & Tropical Architecture, Faculty of Built Environment, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
  • Tey Kim Hai Department of Construction Management, Faculty of Engineering and Green Technology, University Tunku Abdul Rahman, 31900 Kampar, Perak
  • Aminah Md Yusof School of Graduate Studies, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15678

Keywords:

Dispute Management, Structural equation modeling (SEM), Malaysian construction industry

Abstract

Dispute is not uncommon in the complex and fragmented construction industry. Construction disputes, even though extensively investigated, still plagued the Malaysian construction industry. This paper aims to develop a dispute performance index to predict the dispute occurrence in Malaysia. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 374 respondents to generate the weightage of the indices. Dispute sources were classified into stages of pre-construction, construction, and post construction. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was conducted on the data collected from the survey. PCA analysis results were then utilized to perform Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) analysis. SEM evaluated the causal relationship between dispute sources and dispute resolution methods to develop a dispute resolution performance index. The index is essential to benchmark the dispute resolution performance and hence provides a guideline to the construction players in handling and or avoiding disputes.

References

Agarwal, A., Ramamoorti, S., and Jayaraman, V. (2011). Decision Support Systems For Strategic Dispute Resolution. International Journal of Management and Information Systems, 15(4), 13–29.

Alwi, S., and Hampson, K. (2003). Identifying the Important Causes of Delays in Building Construction Projects. The 9th East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction. Bali, Indonesia.

Awang, Z. (2012). Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS Graphic. Shah Alam, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi MARA.

Blake, S., Browne, J., and Sime, S. (2014). A Practical Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution (3 edition). Oxford University Press.

Brown, J. D. (2001). Using Surveys in Language Programs. Cambridge Language Teaching Library, 319 p.

Chang Saar Chai, Aminah Md Yusof and Hadina Habil. (2015). Delay Mitigation in the Malaysian Housing Industry: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach.Journal of Construction in Developing Countries, 20(1), 65–83, 2015.

Dulaimi, M. F., Ling, F. Y. Y., and Bajracharya, A. (2003). Organizational Motivation and Inter-organizational Interaction in Construction Innovation in Singapore. Construction Management and Economics, 21(3), 307–318.

Enshassi, A., and Rass, A. A. (2008). Dispute Resolution Practicees in the Construction Industry in Palestine. China: International Conference on Multi-National Construction Projects. Retrieved from www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB12173.pdf

Farooqui, R. U., and Azhar, S. (2014). Key Causes of Disputes in the Pakistani Construction Industry- Assessment of Trends from the Viewpoint of Contractor. 50th Annual International Conference of the Associated Schools of Construction. Westin, Washington.

Fenn, P., Lowe, D., and Speck, C. (1997). Conflict and Dispute in Construction. Construction Management and Economics, 15(6), 513–518.

Fiadjoe, A. (2013). Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Developing World Perspective. Routledge.

Hall, J. M. (2002). Ineffective Communication: Common Causes of Construction Disputes. Alliance‟s Advisory Council Legal Notes.

Hardy, M. A., and Bryman, A. (2004). Handbook of Data Analysis. Sage Publications.

Iyer, K. C., Chaphalkar, N. B., and Joshi, G. A. (2008). Understanding Time Delay Disputes in Construction Contracts. International Journal of Project Management, 26(2), 174–184.

Klinger, M., Moran, S. D., and Arnold. (2009). Confronting Construction Conflicts. Electrical Construction & Maintenance. Retrieved from http://ecmweb.com/ops-amp-maintenance/confronting-construction-conflicts

Love, P. E. D., Davis, P. R., Ellis, J. M., and Cheung, S. O. (2010). A Systemic View of Dispute Causation. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 3(December 2015), 661–680.

Memon, A. H., Rahman, I. A., and Hasan, M. F. A. (2014). Significant Causes and Effects of Variation Orders in Construction Projects. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 7(21), 4494–4502.

Mitkus, S., & Mitkus, T. (2014). Causes of conflicts in a construction industry: a communicational approach. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 777-786.

Nunnally, J. C., and Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd Editio). New York: McGraw-Hill. Inc.

Onn, C. K. (2003). Resolution of Construction Industry Disputes: An Overview. Retrieved from https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj8w4GRlv_OAhVJpY8KHR0_CcMQFggoMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ckoon-law.com%2FPaper%2FRESOLUTION%2520OF%2520CONSTRUCTION%2520DISPUTES.pdf&usg=AFQjCNF_LhnR0s8mlE8hwiWSdBBhrU

Safinia, S. (2014). A Review on Dispute Resolution Methods in UK Construction Industry. International Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 3(4), 105–108.

Sambasivan, M., and Soon, Y. W. (2007). Causes and Effects of Delays in Malaysian Construction Industry. International Journal of Project Management, 25(5), 517–526.

Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., and Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models : Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23–74.

Downloads

Published

2018-03-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MODELING DISPUTE MANAGEMENT IN CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29. https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v29.15678