MOISTURE RETENTION CURVE OF TROPICAL SAPRIC AND HEMIC PEAT

Authors

  • Ayob Katimon Department of Hydraulics and Hydrology, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Lulie Melling Soil Science Branch, Department of Agriculture, Jalan Badruddin, 93400, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v19.15745

Keywords:

Peat, moisture retention curve, capillary rise

Abstract

This paper presents the preliminary result from a laboratory study to establish the moisture retention curve of undisturbed tropical peat samples classified as Sapric and Hemic. The results obtained were compared with those of the temperate peat. Under the same suction head, tropical peat seems to hold more water. The soil moisture at permanent wilting point (- 15000 cm or -150 kPa) was still relatively high at 50-60 % volumetric indicating that the soil was still visually wet, but may not be available for plant use. The possible implication could be, water table in the field should be maintained optimally high to facilitate irrigation water supply from capillary rise.

References

ASTM D 2974-87 (1999) Test Methods for Moisture, Ash, and Organic Matter of Peat and Other Organic Soils. Philadelphia.

Brady, N.C. and Weil, R.R. (1996) The Nature and Properties of Soils, 11th Ed. Prentice-Hall, Saddle River, new Jersey, 740 pp.

Cambell, G.S. (1974) A simple method for determining unsaturated conductivity from moisture retention data. Soil Science, 177(6): 311-314.

Dasberg, S. and Neuman, S. P.(1977) Peat hydrology in the Hula Basin, Israel: 1.Properties of peat. Journal of Hydrology, 32:219-239.

Gardner, W.R. (1958) Steady state solutions of the unsaturated moisture flow equation with application to evaporation from a water table. Soil Sci., 85:228-232.

Hemond , H. F. and Goldman, J. C. (1985) On Non-Darcian water flow in peat. Journal of Ecology, 73:579-584.

Hemond, H. F. and Fifield, J. (1982) Subsurface flow in salt marsh peat: A model and field study. Limnolosy Oceanography, 27(1): 126-136.

Heiskanen and Makitalo (2002) Soil water characteristic of scot pine and Norway spruce forest sites in Finnish Lapland. Forest Ecology and Management, 162(2002): 137-152. Holden, J. and Burt, T.P. (2002) Piping and pipeflow in a deep peat catchment. Catena, 48: 163-199.

Lambert, K. AND Vanderdeelen, J. (1996) Reliable analytical techniques for the evaluation of

physical and chemical properties of lowland tropical peat soils. International Peat Journal, 6: 50-76.

Lu, N. and Likos, W.J. (2004) Rate of capillary rise in soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering ASCE, 130(6): 646-650.

Melling, L. (2000) Dalat and Mukah Sago Plantation Peat Soil Study. Final Report, Sarawak:Dept.of Agriculture.

Mutalib, A. A., Lim, J. S., Wong, M. H. and Koonvai, L. (1992) Characterization, Distribution and Utilization of Peat in Malaysia. In. Aminuddin, B.Y.(ed.) Proc.of the Int.Symp.on Tropical Peatland. Serdang: MARDI.7-16.

Price, J. (1997) Soil moisture, water tension, and water table relationships in a managed cutover bog. Journal Hydrology, 202(1-4):21-32.

Soil Classification Working Group (1998) The Canadian System of Soil Classification, 3rd Ed. Ontario: Agric.and Agri-Food Canada Publication.

Downloads

Published

2018-05-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

MOISTURE RETENTION CURVE OF TROPICAL SAPRIC AND HEMIC PEAT. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v19.15745