ULTIMATE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT FOR FIXED STEEL OFFSHORE PLATFORM

Authors

  • Narayanan Sambu Potty Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 31750 Tronoh, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia
  • Ahmad Fawwaz Ahmad Sohaimi Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, 31750 Tronoh, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v25.15848

Keywords:

Aged platform, Collapse analysis, Reserve strength, Load factors

Abstract

Currently, more than 80% of Malaysia’s offshore platforms are aged 30-40 years which is beyond the design life of 25 years. Structural assessments are needed to gauge the platforms for the extended use. The two common methods widely used are the simplified ultimate strength analysis and static pushover analysis. Simplified ultimate strength is attained when any of member, joint, pile steel strength and pile soil bearing capacity reaches its ultimate capacity. This is the platform’s ultimate strength. Static pushover analysis generally concentrates on RSR (Reserve Strength Ratio) and RRF (Reserve Resistance Factor) for the ultimate strength. This report summarizes a study of the ultimate strength of jacket platforms designed using API RP2A-WSD 21st Edition (2000) using SACS software with the module for Full Plastic Collapse Analysis. Two types of analyses have been carried out. First the ultimate strength of jacket platform with different number of legs is determined and in the second part the collapse load of platforms for different bracing configuration is studied. The non-linear pushover analysis is done by programming the software to analyze the structure with a set of incremental load until the structure collapses. The non-linear analysis module will distribute the load to alternative load paths available within the jacket framework until the structure collapse or have excessive deformation. In order to cater to uncertainties and distribution of data, several criteria of platform site location, age of service, type of platform, number of legs and other critical-related characteristics were considered. From the first phase of study, it is seen that a platform with more legs has higher ultimate strength compared to less number of legs. Hence a bigger jacket platform with eight legs is stiffer than smaller platform. The bracing configuration study shows that the X-bracing contributes highest rigidity to the whole platform by retaining the platform until the highest load compared to other configurations.

References

Akram M. K. M., Potty, N.S., 2011a, Codewise Classification Of Malaysia’s Offshore Platforms, Proceedings of 7th International Conference On Steel & Aluminium Structures, 13 – 15 July

, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. In Advances in Steel and Aluminium Structures. Editor Lau Hieng Ho. ISBN 978-981-08-9247-0. 9789810892470.

Akram, M. K. M., Potty, N.S., 2011b, Development of a Risk Based Underwater Inspection (RBUI) Methodology for Malaysia Fixed Offshore Structure, NPC 2011, Universiti Teknologi Petronas.

American Petroleum Institute. Assessment of Existing Platforms-Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms. Supplement 1, Section 17

RP2A, 20 Edition.

API RP2A-LRFD. (1993). Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms – Load and Resistance Factor Design, 1st Edition,

API RP2A-WSD. (2000). Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Fixed Offshore Platforms – Working Stress Design, 21st Edition,

Bea, R. G. and Mortazavi, M. M. (1995). Simplified Evaluation of the Capacities of Template Type Offshore Platforms. Proceedings of the Fifth International Offshore and Polar

Engineering Conference, The Hague, The Netherlands, June.

Bolt, H. M., Billington, C.J., and Ward, J.K. (1995). A Review of the Ultimate Strength of Tubular Framed Structures. Health and Safety Executive – Offshore Technology Report OTH 92 365, HSE Books, London.

Cossa, N. J., Potty N.S., Idrus, A. B., Hamid, M. F. A., Nizamani, Z., 2012a, Reliability Analysis of Jacket Platforms in Malaysia – Environmental Load Factor, Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology. 4 (19), 3544-3551.

Cossa, N. J., Potty, N. S., Liew, M. S., 2012b, Development of Partial Environmental Load Factor for Design of Tubular Joints of Offshore Jacket Platforms in Malaysia, The Open Ocean Engineering Journal, 6, 8-15.

Cossa, N. J., Potty, N. S., Liew, M. S., Idrus, A. B., 2011a, Reliability Analysis of Tubular Joints of Offshore Platforms in Malaysia, World Academy of Science, Engineering and

Technology, 60,pp. 838-844.

Cossa, N. J., Potty, N. S., Liew, M. S., Idrus, A. B., 2011b, Reliability Analysis of Tubular Joints of Offshore Platforms in Malaysia, Phuket December 2011 WASET Conference.

Eberg, E., Hellan, 0. and Amdahl, J. (1993). Non linear reassessment of jacket structures under extreme storm cyclic loading. Part 3 The development of structural models for cyclic

response. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, Glasgow.

EDI (Engineering Dynamics INC). (2006). SACS -Supplemental manual of SACS 5.2 release 6.

Fawaz, A. (2010). Ultimate Strength Analysis of Steel Jacket Platform. UG FYP Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, July.

Hellan, 0., Moan, T. and Drange, S. O. (1994). Use of nonlinear pushover analyses in ultimate limit state design and integrity assessment of jacket structures. BOSS '94, Massachusetts.

Hellan, 0., Skallerud, B., Amdahl, J. and Moan, T. (1991). Reassessment of offshore steel structures: Shakedown and cyclic nonlinear FEM analyses. International Offshore and Polar

Engineering Conference, Edinburgh.

Hellan, 0., Tandberg, T. and Hellevig, N. C. (1993). Non linear reassessment of jacket structures under extreme storm cyclic loading. Part 4 - Case studies on existing North Sea platforms.

Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, Glasgow.

Idrus, A. B., Narayanan S. P., Hamid, M. F. A., Nizamani, Z., Cossa, N. J., 2011b, Statistical Parameters Of Steel Tubular Member Design For Offshore Platforms In Malaysia, 7th

International Conference On Steel & Aluminium Structures, 13 – 15 July 2011, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia

Idrus, A. B., Potty, N. S., Hamid, M. F. A., Cossa, N. J., Nizamani, Z., 2011a, Resistance Parameters Statistics for Jacket Platforms in Offshore Malaysia, ISOPE-2011  The Twenty First (2011) International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Maui, Hawaii, USA, June 19–24, 2011

Idrus, A. B., Potty, N. S., Hamid, M. F. A., Nizamani, Z., Cossa, N. J., 2011c, Selection Of Environmental Parameters For Offshore Jacket Platform Design In Malaysia, 7th

International Conference On Steel & Aluminium Structures, 13 – 15 July, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia.

Kallaby, J. and Millman, D. N. (1974). Inelastic analysis of fixed offshore platforms for earthquake loading. OTC 2357, Houston

Krieger, W. F., Banon, H., Lloyd, J. R., De, R. S., Digre, K. A., Nair, D., Irick, J. T. and Guynes, S. J. (1994). Process for assessment of existing platforms to determine fitness for purpose.

OTC, Paper No. 7482, OTC, pp. 131-140, Houston.

Lloyd, J. R. and Clawson, W. C. (1984). Reserve and residual strength of pile founded, offshore platforms. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington.

Marshal, P. W. and Bea, R. G. (1976). Failure modes for offshore platforms. BOSS. Trondheim. Marshall, P. W. (1979). Strategy for monitoring, inspection and repair for fixed offshore

structures. Behaviour of Offshore Structure Conference, London.

Nelson, A., Sanderson, D. J., Thurlbeck, S. D. (2004). Effect of platform robustness on inspection planning, HSE, UK, Research Report 246.

Potty, N. S., Akram M. K. M. and Khamidi, M. F., 2012, Risk-Based Assessment On Malaysia’s Offshore Jacket Platform, Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering. 24, 1, 29-47.

RNZ. (2009). Structural Integrity Assessment Basis for Provision of Updating SACS Model and Static In place Analysis for 5 PMO Platforms for PCSB PMO. Doc. No.: P3112-ST-DB0001.

SINTEF, USFOS. (1994). A computer Program for Progressive Collapse Analysis of Steel Offshore Structures, Users Manual 7.0.

Stewart, G., and Tromans, P. S. (1993). Non linear reassessment of jacket structures under extreme storm cyclic loading. Part 2 -Representative environmental load histories. Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, Glasgow.

Stewart, G., Efthymiou, M. and Vugts, J. H. (1988). Ultimate strength and integrity assessment of fixed offshore platforms, Behaviour of Offshore Structures Conference, Trondheim.

Stewart, G., Moan, T., Amdahl, J. and Eide, O.I. (1993). Non linear reassessment of jacket structures under extreme storm cyclic loading. Part I - Philosophy and acceptance criteria.

Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering Conference, Glasgow.

Titus, P. G. and Banon, H. (1988). Reserve strength analyses of offshore platforms, Offshore Southeast Asia Conference, Paper 88179, February

Vannan, M. T., Thompson, H. M., Griffin, J. J. and Gelpi S. L. (1994). Automated procedure for platform strength assessment. Offshore Technology Conference, Paper No. OTC 7474, Houston.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

ULTIMATE STRENGTH ASSESSMENT FOR FIXED STEEL OFFSHORE PLATFORM. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v25.15848