COCKLE SHELL ASH REPLACEMENT FOR CEMENT AND FILLER IN CONCRETE

Authors

  • Nor Hazurina Othman Fisheries Research Institute, Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 11960 Batu Maung, Penang, Malaysia
  • Badorul Hisham Abu Bakar School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
  • Mashitah Mat Don School of Chemical Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
  • Megat Azmi Megat Johari School of Civil Engineering, Engineering Campus, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v25.15853

Keywords:

Cockle, concrete, filler, cement replacement, morphology

Abstract

The concepts of eco-friendly building are getting more attention today. The use of materials from natural sources is an alternative to the realization of the green building concept. Considering this approach, a study was conducted to investigate the potential of cockle shell ash as a material for partial cement replacement or a filler material. The study was to determine the chemical composition of cockle shell ash and were determined using Fluorescence X-ray analysis. The observation of on the morphology structure based on SEM analysis was also performed. The next phase involved in determining the concrete properties such as compressive strength, tensile, modulus of elasticity, water permeability and porosity made from mixture of cockle shell ash of 5%, 10%, 15%, 25%, 50% and compared to normal concrete cured in ordinary water at the 7, 28, 90 days and up to 120 days for water permeability test. As a result, with the inclusion of 5% and 10% of cockle shell ash, morphology structure seems compacted that effected the strength, modulus of elasticity, permeability and porosity of the concrete.

References

Awang-Hazmi A.J., Zuki A.B.Z, Noordin M.M., Jalila A. & Norimah Y. (2007) Mineral Composition of The Cockle (Anadara granosa) Shells of West Coast of Peninsular Malaysia & It’s Potential as Biomaterial for Use in Bone Repair: Journal of Animal & Veterinary Advances, 6(5):591-594.

Barros M.C. , Bello P.M., Bao M. & Torrado J.J. (2009) From Waste To Commodity: Transforming Shells Into High Purity Calcium Carbonate: Journal of Cleaner Production, 17:400-407.

British Standards Institution. (1983) BS1881-121-1983 Testing Concrete. Method for Determination of Static Modulus of Elasticity in Compression: London: British European Standard.

British Standards Institution. (1996) BS1881-208:1996 Testing Concrete. Recommendations for The Determination of The Initial Surface Absorption of Concrete. London: British European Standard.

British Standards Institution. (2009) BS EN 12390-6:2009 Testing Hardened Concrete. Tensile Splitting Strength of Test Specimens: London: British European Standard.

British Standards Institution. (2009) BS EN 12390-3:2009 Testing Hardened Concrete. Compressive Strength of Test Specimens: London: British European Standard.

Falade F. (1995) An Investigation of Periwinkle Shells as Coarse Aggregate in Concrete: Building and Environment, 30(4):573-577.

Department of Fisheries Malaysia (2011) Information on http:// www.dof.gov.my/html/themes/moa_dof/documents/ jadual_pendaratan_marin_aquaculture.pdf.

Lertwattanaruk P., Makul N. & Siripattarapravat C. (2012) Utilization of Ground Waste Seashells in Cement Mortars for Masonry And Plastering: Journal of Environmental

Management, 111:133-141.

Mustakimah M., Suzana Y. & Saikat M. (2010) Composition Study of Calcium Carbonate in Cockle Shell. 8th Conference on Advanced Processes Materials, World

Engineering Congress 2010, Kuching, Sarawak. 16-20.

Muthusamy K. and Sabri N.A. (2012) Cockle Shell: A Potential Partial Coarse Aggregate Replacement in Concrete: International Journal of Science, Environment & Technology, 1(4):260-267.

Sahari F. & Mijan N.A. (2011) Cockle Shell as An Alternative Construction Material for Artificial Reef: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Applied and Creative Arts,

Faculty of Applied and Creative Arts, UNIMAS, Kuching, Sarawak.

Sugiyama M. (2004) The Compressive Strength of Concrete Containing Tile Chips, Crushed Scallop Shells & Crushed Roofing Tiles, edited by Limbachiya, M.C & Roberts, J.J. in

Sustainable Waste Management & Recycling: Construction Demolition Waste, London, Thomas Telford Publishing. 165-172

Valanta O. (1970) Durability of Concrete: Mater Struc. 3:333-345.

Yang E.I., Yi S.T. & Leem Y.M. (2005) Effect of Oyster Shell Substituted for Fine Aggregate on Concrete Characteristics: Part 1. Fundamental Properties: Journal of Cement & Concrete

Research, 35:2175-2182.

Yusof M., Ujai S.J.J., Sahari F., Taib S.N.L. & Noor Mohamed N.H. (2011) Application of Clam (Lokan) Shell as Beach Retaining Wall, Proceeding of EnCon 2011: 4th Engineering Conference, Kuching, Sarawak.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

COCKLE SHELL ASH REPLACEMENT FOR CEMENT AND FILLER IN CONCRETE. (2018). Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v25.15853