PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF HYDRAULIC PARAMETERS OF A DEVELOPED DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/mjce.v31.16106Keywords:
Coefficient of variation, coefficient of uniformity, drip irrigation system, emitter flow variation, emission uniformityAbstract
Experiment was carried out in the department of Agricultural and Bioresources Engineering, during the period of August to October, 2017. The hydraulic performance of a developed drip irrigation system was assessed. The experimental work was conducted on field with irrigated field area of 7 m x 3 m and lateral spacing was 0.35 m. Sixty (60) hospital drip sets (given sets) were used for the experiment as improved emitters. Volumetric method was used to determine application rate (PR) and emitters discharge. The emission uniformity, emitter flow variation, co-efficient of uniformity and co-efficient of variation were determined accordance with the equations described by the American Society of Agricultural Engineering (ASAE). Soil chemical properties were determined accordance with the American Public Health Association (APHA). The findings revealed that the soil in the area is classified as sand clay loam and normal soil. Results indicated that the mean and standard deviation of the emitters were 9.639 L/hr and 0.07 L/hr respectively. There were no emitters clogging. The emitter flow variation was 2.5 % and less than 10 % which was desirable range, while coefficient of variation was 0.07 and less than 0.11 which was marginal. The application rate was 17 mm hr-1 which was within the recommended range of 15 – 25 mm hr-1. The emission uniformity and coefficient of uniformity were 99.4% and 99.2% respectively, which shows that the system was well-designed. This finding indicated that hospital drip sets proved to the high quality. Therefore, it can be used as standard emitter.
References
AL Amound, A. I. 1995. Significance Of Energy Losses Due To Emitter Connections In Trickle Irrigation Lines. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 60:1-5.
American Public Health Association, APHA. 2005. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 16th and 17th Eds. Washington, DC; American Water Works Association, Water Control Federation.
ASAE. 1999. Field Evaluation Of Micro-Irrigation Systems. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. 792-797
Brady, N. and Weil, R. 2002. The Nature and Properties of Soils, 13th Edition. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey. 960.
Creswell, G. and Huett, D. 2006. Managing nursery runoff, 4th edition. NSW Agriculture, Horticultural research and Development Corporation and Industry Association of Australia, Wollongbur
Dhawan, B. D. 2000. Drip irrigation: Evaluating Returns, Economic and Political Weekly, 35 (42): 3775 – 3780
Dhawan, B. D. 2002. Technological Change In Irrigated Agriculture. A Study Of Water Saving Methods. Commonwealth Publishers. New Delhi.
Glenn, D. S. and Marcel, P. A. 2012. Water Conservation in Irrigated Agriculture: Trends and Challenges in the Face of Emerging Demands
FAO/IIASA. 2008. Harmonized World Soil, database’’ version 1.0, FAO, Rome, Italy & ASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 210 – 212.
Haydu, J. J., Beeson, R. C. and Caron, J. 2004. Economics Of Five Irrigation Technologies For Container Viburnum Odoratissimum. Acta Horticulture , 664:309 – 315
Kumar, S. and Singh, P. 2004. Evaluation Of Hydraulic Performance Of Drip Irrigation System. Journal of Agricultural Engineering. 44 page?
Mirjat, M. S., Mirjat, M. U. and Chandio, F. A. 2010. Water Distribution Pattern, Discharge Uniformity And Application Efficiency Of Locally Made Emitters Used In A Trickle Subunit. Pakistan Journal of Agriculture, 26 (1): 1-15.
Namara, R. E., Upadhyay, B. and Nagar, R. K. 2005. Adoption and Impacts of Microirrigation Technologies : Empirical Results from Selected Localities of Maharashtra and Gujarat States of India, Research Report 93, International Water Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka
Narayanamoorthy, A. 2005. Averting water crisis by drip irrigation: Case study of a farmer from Tamil Nadu, Indian Journal of Agricultural Economic, 58 (3): 427 – 437
Qureshi, M.E., Wegener, M. K., Harrison, S. R. and Bristow, K. L. 2001. Economic Evaluation Of Alternate Irrigation Systems For Sugarcane in the Burdekin delta in North Queensland, Australia, In: Water Resource Management, Eds: C.A. Brebbia, K. Anagnostopoulos, K. Katsifarakis and A.H.D. Cheng, WIT Press, Boston, 47-57.
Sivanappan, R. K. 2002. Strengths and weaknesses of growth of drip irrigation in India, In: Proc. of Micro Irrigation for Sustainable Agriculture. GOI Short–term training 19-21 June, WTC, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore.
Solomon, K. H. 1983. Irrigation Uniformity And Yield Theory. Ph. D. Dissertation. Department of Agricultural and Irrigation Engineering, Utah State University, Logan UT. 287
Tyson, T. W. and Curtis, L. M. 2009. Evaluating Water Distribution Uniformity In Micro-Irrigation Systems†available at http://www.aces.edu/anr/irrigation/documents/BSENIRR090/fieldEvaluationofsystemuniformity.pdf(accessed at 30 September 2017)
Vance, L. 2004. Evaluation of the Application Uniformity Of Subsurface Drip Distribution Systems. M.Sc Thesis, Texas A& M University.
Wu, I. P. 1997. Assessment of Hydraulic Design Of Micro-Irrigation Systems. Agricultural Water Management, 32 (30): 275 - 284