EFFECT OF PIPERAZINE (PIP) CONCENTRATION AND REACTION TIME ON THE FORMATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS (FO) MEMBRANE

Authors

  • Mohammad Amirul Mohd Yusof Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300 Gambang Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Mazrul Nizam Abu Seman Faculty of Chemical and Natural Resources Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Lebuhraya Tun Razak, 26300 Gambang Kuantan, Pahang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.10429

Keywords:

Polyamide membrane, forward osmosis, water flux, humic acid rejection, salt leakage

Abstract

Nowadays, wide applications of forward osmosis (FO) technology have been huge attention in solving the water shortage problems. Hence, the performance of thin film composite (TFC) forward osmosis membrane via interfacial polymerization (IP) was studied. 2% and 1% w/v of piperazine (PIP) and 0.15% w/v of trimesoyl chloride (TMC) were reacted with 3 different reaction time (60s, 30s, and 10s). The fabricated membranes were then characterized by FTIR, contact angle measurement and FESEM. Pure water flux, humic acid rejection (represent NOM) and salt leakage were evaluated to obtain the best polyamide FO membrane. The results demonstrated that polyamide FO membranes fabricated with 2% w/v possess a higher hydrophilic properties compared to 1% w/v. In addition, regardless of monomer concentrations, at longest reaction time (60s), there is no significant change in water flux. Membrane fabricated at 60s of reaction time exhibited water flux of 1.90 LMH and 1.92 LMH for 2% w/v and 1% w/v of PIP concentrations, respectively. The same trend also observed for humic acid rejection (93.9%-94.6%). The salt leakage test revealed that the minimum salt reverse diffusion (0.01-0.02 GMH) could be achieved for membrane fabricated at longest reaction time of 60s for both PIP concentrations. As conclusion, manipulating monomer concentrations and reaction time is the main key to obtain an optimal polyamide layer with high membrane performance covering higher water flux, higher removal of humic acid and lower reverse salt diffusion.  

References

Baker, E. C., Sullivan, D. A., and Regional, N. 1983. Development of a Pilot-Plant Process for the Extraction of Soy Flakes with Aqueous Isopropyl Alcohol. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society. 60(7): 1271-1277

Garcia-castello, E. M., Mccutcheon, J. R., and M. Elimelech. 2009. Performance Evaluation Of Sucrose Concentration Using Forward Osmosis. J. Memb. Sci. 338: 61-66.

Chung, T., Zhang, S., Yu, K., Su, J., and Ming, M. 2012. Forward Osmosis Processes : Yesterday, Today And Tomorrow. Desalination. 287: 78-81.

McCutcheon, J. R., McGinnis, R. L., and Elimelech, M. 2006. Desalination By Ammonia-Carbon Dioxide Forward Osmosis: Influence Of Draw And Feed Solution Concentrations On Process Performance. J. Memb. Sci. 278: 114-123.

Reddy, K.V. and Ghaffour, N. 2007. Overview Of The Cost Of Desalinated Water And Costing Methodologies. Desalination. 205: 340-353.

McGinnis, R. L. and Elimelech, M. 2007. Energy Requirements Of Ammonia-Carbon Dioxide Forward Osmosis Desalination. Desalination. 207: 370-382.

Emadzadeh, D., Lau, W. J., and Ismail, A. F. 2013. Synthesis Of Thin Film Nanocomposite Forward Osmosis Membrane With Enhancement In Water Flux Without Sacrificing Salt Rejection. Desalination. 330: 90-99.

Amirul, M., Yusof, M., Nizam, M., Seman, A. and Hilal, N. 2016. Development Of Polyamide Forward Osmosis Membrane For Humic Acid Removal. Desalin. Water Treat. 3994: 1-5.

Han, G., Chung, T. S., Toriida, M. and Tamai, S. 2012. Thin-Film Composite Forward Osmosis Membranes With Novel Hydrophilic Supports For Desalination. J. Memb. Sci. 423-424: 543-555.

Widjojo, N., Chung, T.-S., Weber, W., Maletzko, C. and Warzelhan, V. 2011. The Role Of Sulphonated Polymer And Macrovoid-Free Structure In The Support Layer For Thin-Film Composite (TFC) Forward Osmosis (FO) Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 383: 214-223.

Wei, J., Liu, X., Qiu, C., Wang, R. and Tang, C. Y. Influence Of Monomer Concentrations On The Performance Of Polyamide-Based Thin Film Composite Forward Osmosis Membranes. J. Memb. Sci. 381: 110-117.

Mehrparvar, A., Rahimpour, A. and Jahanshahi, M. 2014. Modified Ultrafiltration Membranes For Humic Acid Removal. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 45: 275-282.

Yang, F., Zhang, S., Yang, D. and Jian, X. 2007. Preparation And Characterization Of Polypiperazine Amide/PPESK Hollow Fiber Composite Nanofiltration Membrane. J. Memb. Sci. 301: 85-92.

Jalanni, N. A., Abu Seman, M. N. and Faizal, C. K. M. 2013. Investigation Of New Polyester Nanofiltration (NF) Membrane Fouling With Humic Acid Solution. Jurnal Teknologi. 65: 69-72.

Emadzadeh, D., Lau, W. J., Sisakhat, M. R., Ilbeygi, H., Rana, D., Matsuura, T. and Ismail, A. F. 2015. Synthesis, Modification And Optimization Of Titanate Nanotubes-Polyamide Thin Film Nanocomposite (TFN) Membrane For Forward Osmosis (FO) Application. Chemical Engineering Journal. 281: 243-251.

Downloads

Published

2017-01-31

How to Cite

EFFECT OF PIPERAZINE (PIP) CONCENTRATION AND REACTION TIME ON THE FORMATION OF THIN FILM COMPOSITE FORWARD OSMOSIS (FO) MEMBRANE. (2017). Jurnal Teknologi, 79(1-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.10429