DUCTILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SUB FRAME FOR INDUSTRIALIZED BUILDING SYSTEM

Authors

  • Ahmed Sabah Aljawadi Department of Structure and Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abdul Kadir Marsono Department of Structure and Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Che Ros Ismail Department of Structure and Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v81.11452

Keywords:

Industrialized building system, H frames, beam-column connection, cyclic lateral push over test, hybrid connection, ductility

Abstract

An accurate determination of industrialized building system (IBS) frames ductility under alternating lateral loads is the key issue of this study. The performance features of IBS H frame assembly subjected to cyclic lateral pushover test with six attached IBS components are reported. A test scheme of nonlinear elastic sub-frame system is proposed to build an IBS structural building system. This system complies with the requirements of strength and ductility governed by European Codes 2 and 8. The three models are a conventional reinforced concrete H frame system CRCH (Model 1), IBS with steel conventional links as reinforcements IBSHN (Model 2), and special spiral links concrete IBSHS (Model 3). Each model is scaled to 1:5. All models are laboratory examined under cyclic lateral pushover test to failure, where the IBS connections are considered as hybrid partial rigid linking beams to columns. The beam ends are connected to column boxes via a U shaped steel plate. The experimental results of the IBS specimens are compared with the conventional reinforced concrete connection of similar shapes and size in the form of H sub-frame mechanism tested under the same condition. The models are subjected to cyclic lateral load controlled applied at the beam-column connection. The performance evaluation of IBS connections is made via load displacement hysteresis, ultimate and collapse parameter, ductility index, and surface cracks appearances. The conventional concrete specimen is obviously found to display better strength compared to IBS. Conversely, the ductility of IBS H frame specimen with spiral shear links and conventional closed loop links exhibits superior features compared to the conventional concrete specimen which is beneficial to earthquake engineering. It is demonstrated that the performance of the precast concrete structure is highly dependent on the ductile capacity of connectors to each of the IBS component. This is significant especially at the joints such as the beam-to-column connections. Our systematic methods on ductility characterizations of reinforced concrete beams may contribute toward the development of IBS in resisting earthquakes.

References

Moghadasi, M., & Marsono, A. K. 2012. Comparative Experimental Study of Fullâ€scale Hâ€Subframe Using a New Industrialized Building System and Monolithic Reinforced Concrete Beamâ€toâ€Column Connection. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings.

Kamar, K. A. M., Hamid, Z. A., Azman, M. N. A., Ahamad, M. S. S. 2011. Industrialized Building System (IBS): Revisiting Issue of Definition and Classification. International Journal of Emerging Sciences. 1(2): 120-132.

Moghadasi, M., Marsono, A. K., & Mohammadyan-Yasouj, S. E. 2017. A Study on Rotational Behaviour of a New Industrialised Building System Connection. Steel and Composite Structures. 25(2): 245-255.

Richard, R. B. 2005. Reproduction before Automation and Robotics. Journal of Automation in Construction. 14: 251-441.

Mydin, M. O., Sani, N. M., & Taib, M. 2014. Industrialised Building System in Malaysia: A Review. MATEC Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences. 10: 01002.

Fateh, M. A. M., & Mohammad, M. F. 2017. Industrialized Building System (IBS) Provision in Local and International Standard Form of Contracts. Journal of Construction in Developing Countries. 22(2): 67-80.

Warszawski, A. 2004. Industrialized and Automated Building Systems: A Managerial Approach. Taylor & Francis.

Olteanu, I., Ciongradi, I. P., Anechitei, M. and Budescu, M. (2009). The Ductile Design Concept for Seismic Actions in Miscellaneous Design Codes. Bulletin of the Polytechnic Institute of Jassy, Constructions, Architechture Section, 55.

Ghayeb, H. H., Razak, H. A., & Sulong, N. R. 2017. Development and Testing of Hybrid Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections under Cyclic Loading. Construction and Building Materials. 151: 258-278.

Engström B. 2008. Structural Connections for Precast Concrete Buildings. (43). Lausanne, Switzerland: the International Federation for Structural Concrete (fib).

Castro, J. J., Yamaguchi, T. and Imai, H. 1994. Seismic Performance of Precast Concrete Beam-Column Joints. Journal of Structural Construction Engineering. 455: 113-26.

Li, B., Kulkarani, S.A. and Leong, C. L. 2009. Seismic Performance of Precast Hybrid-Steel Concrete Connections. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 1(35): 667-689.

Xue, W. and Yang, X. 2010. Seismic Tests of Precast Concrete Moment Resisting Frames and Connections. PCI Journal. 55(3): 102-121.

Vidjeapriya, R., Vasanthalakshmi, V. and Jaya, K. P. 2013. Performance of Exterior Precast Dowel Connections under Cyclic Loading Beam-Column Dowel Connections under Cyclic Loading. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 12(1): 82-95.

Ghayeb, H. H., Razak, H. A., & Sulong, N. R. 2017. Development and Testing of Hybrid Precast Concrete Beam-to-Column Connections under Cyclic Loading. Construction and Building Materials. 151: 258-278.

British Standards Institution. 2004. Eurocode 2: Design of Concrete Structures: Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. British Standards Institution.

Standard, B. 2005. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance.

FEMA-273. 1997. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation Of Buildings, Report No. FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

FEMA-356. 2000. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Report No. FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.

Downloads

Published

2019-01-22

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

DUCTILITY OF REINFORCED CONCRETE SUB FRAME FOR INDUSTRIALIZED BUILDING SYSTEM. (2019). Jurnal Teknologi, 81(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v81.11452