TREATMENT OF RUBBER INDUSTRY WASTEWATER BY USING FENTON REAGENT AND ACTIVATED CARBON

Authors

  • Tuty Emilia Agustina Chemical Engineering Department, Sriwijaya University, Indralaya, 30662, Indonesia
  • Elon Jefri Sirait Chemical Engineering Department, Sriwijaya University, Indralaya, 30662, Indonesia
  • Herman Silalahi Chemical Engineering Department, Sriwijaya University, Indralaya, 30662, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.11872

Keywords:

Rubber industries, Fenton reagent, activated carbon adsorption

Abstract

Rubber industries are sufficiently developed and widely spread countryside as well as in some big cities in Indonesia. An Increasing number of rubber industries have also increased rubber wastewater. However, the rubber industry development should pay attention to the impact on the environment. The rubber wastewater is problematic, because of high Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) content. So far, the methods that have been used to remove COD in the waste water have been proven to be costly and time consuming. The research objective is to treat the rubber wastewater by using a combination of Fenton reagent and activated carbon adsorption. In this study, effect of molar ratios of Fenton reagent, pH, and reaction time on COD degradation were studied. After treating with Fenton reagent, the wastewater was passed into an adsorption column of 20 cm height of activated carbon granules. The maximum COD degradation of 95% were found by using a combination of Fenton reagent and activated carbon, with a molar ratio of reagent Fenton 1:250 and a reaction time of 45 minutes. The final COD of 71 mg/l, TSS of 70 mg/l, and pH of 7.8 were found which fulfilled the environmental quality standard regulation for industrial wastewater in Indonesia. 

References

Z. Xiaofei. 2008. A Study on Countermeasure for Labor Force Shortage in Natural Rubber Industry with Reference To China-ASEAN Region Integration. Int. Conf. China-ASEAN Reg. Integr. Polit. Econ. Trade, Growth Invest. University of Malaya.

I. O. Asia, E. E. Akporhonor. 2007. Characterization and Physicochemical Treatment of Wastewater from Rubber Processing Factory. Int. J. Physic Sci. 2: 61-67.

M. Mohammadi, H. C. Man, M. A. Hassan, P. L. Yee. 2010. Treatment of Wastewater from Rubber Industry in Malaysia. 9: 6233-6243.

N. H. Nguyen, T. T. Luong. 2012. Situation of Wastewater Treatment of Natural Rubber Latex Processing in the Southeastern Region, Vietnam. J. Vietnamese Environ. 2: 58-64. doi:10.13141/jve.vol2.no2.pp58-64.

H. P.J. S. Pillai, K. Girish. 2014. Rubber Processing Industry Effluent Treatment Using a Bacterial Consortium. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci. 3: 775-782.

N. M. N. Sulaiman, S. Ibrahim, S. L. Abdullah. 2010. Membrane Bioreactor for the Treatment of Natural Rubber Wastewater. Int. J. Environ. Eng. 2: 92-109.

B. John, O. James. 2009. Applications of Advanced Oxidation for Wastewater Treatment. WPI’s US-Africa Roundtable Conf., Worcester Polytechnic Institute.

P. R. Gogate, A. B. Pandit. 2004. A Review of Imperative Technologies for Wastewater Treatment I : Oxidation Technologies at Ambient Conditions. 8: 501-551. doi:10.1016/S1093-0191(03)00032-7.

N. Rungruang, S. Babel. 2008. Treatment of Natural Rubber Processing Wastewater by Combination of Ozonation and Activated Sludge Process. Proceed-Ing Int. Conf. Environ. Re-Search Technol. (ICERT 2008). Parkroyal, Penang, Malaysia. 259-263.

T. E. Agustina. 2013. AOPs Application on Dyes Removal, in: S.K. Sharma, R. Sanghi (Eds.). Wastewater Reuse Manag. Springer, Dordrecht. 353-372. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4942-9.

M. S. Lucas. 2006. Decolorization of the Azo Dye Reactive Black 5 by Fenton and Photo-Fenton Oxidation. 71: 236-244. doi:10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.07.007.

APHA, AWWA, WEF. 2012. Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 22nd ed.

I. Gulkaya, G. A. Surucu, F. B. Dilek. 2006. Importance of H2O2/Fe2+ ratio in Fenton’s Treatment of a Carpet Dyeing Wastewater. 136: 763-769. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.01.006.

T. E. Agustina, Y. Wijaya, F. Mermaliandi. 2016. Degradation of Reactive Red 2 by Fenton and Photo-Fenton Oxidation Processes. 11: 5227-5231.

C.-Y. Chang, Y.-H. Hsieh, K.-Y. Cheng, L.-L. Hsieh, T.-C. Cheng, K.-S. Yao. 2008. Effect of pH on Fenton Process Using Estimation of Hydroxyl Radical with Salicylic Acid as Trapping Reagent. Water Sci. Technol. 58: 873-879. doi:10.2166/wst.2008.429.

F. A. El-gohary, M. I. Badawy, M. El-khateeb, A. S. El-Kalliny. 2009. Integrated Treatment of Olive Mill Wastewater (OMW) by the Combination of Fenton’ s Reaction and Anaerobic Treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 162: 1536-1541. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.06.098.

D. Petruzzelli, G. Boghetich, M. Petrella, A. Dell’erba, P. L’abbate, S. Sanarica, M. Miraglia. 2007. Pre-treatment of Industrial Landfill Leachate by Fenton’ s Oxidation, Global. 9: 51-56.

A. Babuponnusami, K. Muthukumar. 2014. A Review on Fenton and Improvements to the Fenton Process for Wastewater Treatment. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2: 557-572. doi:10.1016/j.jece.2013.10.011.

A. S. Stasinakis. 2016. Use of Selected Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) for Wastewater Treatment – A Mini Review. Glob. Nest J. 10: 376-385.

Downloads

Published

2017-11-02

How to Cite

TREATMENT OF RUBBER INDUSTRY WASTEWATER BY USING FENTON REAGENT AND ACTIVATED CARBON. (2017). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 79(7-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v79.11872