TORSIONAL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF MALAYSIAN TROPICAL TIMBER IN STRUCTURAL SIZE

Authors

  • Muhammad Bazli Faliq Mohd Puaad UiTM Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, Jalan Purnama, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia
  • Zakiah Ahmad Institute for Infrastructure Engineering and Sustainable Management (IIESM), Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Adrina Ros­seira Abu Talip UiTM Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, Jalan Purnama, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia
  • Mohd Zulkhairi Mat Salleh UiTM Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, Jalan Purnama, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia
  • Shahrul Nizam Moham­mad UiTM Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, Jalan Purnama, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v82.13984

Keywords:

Shear strength, torsion test, structural size, small clear specimen, Malaysian tropical timber

Abstract

The shear strength of timber joists in timber design is important, especially to provide an adequate torsional stability and to avoid vibrational serviceability problems. In Malaysia, the data of shear strength of timber is available in MS544 Part 2. The data were developed by shear block test with small samples without defect known as small clear samples. Torsion test is one of the other approaches that can be used to attain the state of pure shear as it does produce a purer and a clearer shear stress distribution in the specimen, allowing measurement of the pure shear properties. However, in Malaysia, very little attention has been paid to the use of the torsion test in evaluating shear strength. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the torsional shear strength of selected Malaysian tropical timbers of different strength groupings (SG) namely Balau (SG1), Kempas (SG2), Kelat (SG3), Kapur (SG4), Resak (SG4), Keruing (SG5), Mengkulang (SG5), Light Red Meranti (SG6), and Geronggang (SG 7) using structural size timbers in accordance with BS:EN 408 and then compared with published by MS554: Part 2. The result shows contradictions of strength grouping between findings and published by MS554: Part 2. Resak (SG4) and Mengkulang (SG5) grade stress value have risen towards SG 3. Geronggang is currently in the SG6. Also from the findings, Kelat (SG3), Kapur (SG4) and Keruing (SG5) grade stresses are at par towards each other, even though they are completely in the different strength group as stated in MS544: Part 2. In conclusion, shear strength data need to be re-examined, since the strength for the tested specimen is much higher than the data given in MS 544 Part 2. This will lead to the increment in section and wastage in cost.

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Bazli Faliq Mohd Puaad, UiTM Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, Jalan Purnama, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

    LECTURER,

    FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING,

    UITM CAWANGAN JOHOR, KAMPUS PASIR GUDANG

    JALAN PURNAMA, BANDAR SERI ALAM

    81750 MASAI

    JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM

  • Zakiah Ahmad, Institute for Infrastructure Engineering and Sustainable Management (IIESM), Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia

    Dean's,

    Office Level 8,Tower 1, Kompleks Kejuruteraan, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Mara Shah Alam Selangor 40450 Malaysia

  • Adrina Ros­seira Abu Talip, UiTM Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, Jalan Purnama, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

    LECTURER,

    FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING,

    UITM CAWANGAN JOHOR, KAMPUS PASIR GUDANG

    JALAN PURNAMA, BANDAR SERI ALAM

    81750 MASAI

    JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM

  • Mohd Zulkhairi Mat Salleh, UiTM Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, Jalan Purnama, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

    LECTURER,

    FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING,

    UITM CAWANGAN JOHOR, KAMPUS PASIR GUDANG

    JALAN PURNAMA, BANDAR SERI ALAM

    81750 MASAI

    JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM

  • Shahrul Nizam Moham­mad, UiTM Cawangan Johor, Kampus Pasir Gudang, Jalan Purnama, Bandar Seri Alam, 81750 Masai, Johor Darul Takzim, Malaysia

    LECTURER,

    FACULTY OF CIVIL ENGINEERING,

    UITM CAWANGAN JOHOR, KAMPUS PASIR GUDANG

    JALAN PURNAMA, BANDAR SERI ALAM

    81750 MASAI

    JOHOR DARUL TAKZIM

References

USDA. 1999. Wood Handbook: Wood as an Engineering Material. US Department of Agriculture and Forest Product Laboratory, Madison, WI, USA

Khokhar, A. M. 2011. The Evaluation of Shear Properties of Timber Beams Using Torsion Test Method. Doctor of Philosophy. Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh, Scotland, United Kingdom.

Keenen, F. J. 1974. Shear Strength of Wood Beams. Forest Products Journal. 24(09): 63-70.

Puaad, M. B. F. M. 2013 Bending and Compressive Properties of Malaysian Timber in Structural Size. Master of Science Thesis. Faculty of Civil Engineering. Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam, Selangor. Malaysia.

Ahmad, Z., Bon, Y. C., Wahab. E. S. A. 2003. Tensile Strength Properties of Tropical Hardwoods in Structural Size Testing. International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences IJBAS-IJENS. 10(03).

Vafai, A., Pinus, G. 1973. Torsional and Bending Behaviour of Wood Beams. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering. 99(ST6): 1205-1221.

Divos, F., Tanaka, T., Nagao, H., Kato, H. 1998. Determination of Shear Modulus on Sonstruction Size Timber. Wood Science and Technology. 32(06): 393-402.

Yoshihara, H., Furushima, T. 2003. Shear Strengths of Wood Measured by Various Short Beam Shear Test Methods. Wood Science and Technology. 37(03): 188-197.

Ido, H., Nagao, H., Kato, H. 2007. Comparison between Compression Strength Perpendicular to the Grain and Shear Strength Parallel to the Grain of Western Hemlock [Tsuga Heterophylla] Lumber. Bulletin of the Forestry and Forest Products.

Ahmad, Z. 2013. Laminated Veneer Lumber Made from Tropical Forest Trees (Mechanical Properties). UiTM Press. UiTM Shah Alam, Malaysia

Gupta, R., Heck, L. R., Miller, T. H. 2002. Experimental Evaluation of the Torsion Test for Determining Shear Strength of Structural Lumber. Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 30(4): 283-290.

Ahmad, Y. 2010. Bending Behavior of Timber Beams Strengthened Using Fiber Reinforced Polymer Bars and Plates. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Johor. Malaysia.

Hassan, R., Ahmad, Z., Ibrahim, A., Noh, M. S. 2004. Compresisive Strength Properties of Structural Size Timber Made from Selected Malaysian Tropical Timber. Institute Penyelidikan, Pembangunan dan Komersilan, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam, Malaysia.

San, H. P. 2003. Basic Engineering Properties of Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) Produced from Tropical Hardwood Species. Doctor of Philosophy Thesis. Faculty of Forestry Universiti Putra Malaysia. Selangor. Malaysia.

EN384:2003. 2003. Structural Timber-determination of Characteristic Values of Mechanical Properties and Density. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

EN14358:2016. 2016. Timber Structures - Calculation and Verification of Characteristic Values.

EN338:2009. 2009. Timber Structures - Strength Classes. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

EN408:20010. 2010. Timber Structures - Structural Timber and Glued Laminated Timber - Determination of Some Physical and Mechanical Properties Perpendicular to the Grain. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.

BS 5756:2011. 2011. Visual Grading of Hardwood - Specification

Chu, Y. P., Ho, K. S., Midon, M. S., Malik, A. R. A. 1997. Timber Design Handbook. FRIM, Malaysia. Kepong.

BS 5268-2:2002. Structural Use of Timber - Part 2: Code of Practice for Permissible Stress Design, Materials and Workmanship.

MS 544 Part 3: 2001. Code of Practice for the Structural Use of Timber Part 3: Permissible Stress Design of Glued Laminated Timber.

NZW. 2007. Information Sheet. Grading Systems for Structural Timber.

Säll, H., Källsner, B., Olsson, A. 2007. Bending Strength and Stiffness of Aspen Sawn Timber. COST E 53 Conference - Quality Control for Wood and Wood Products. 15th – 17th October 2007, Warsaw, Poland.

Bodig, J. and Jayne, B. A. 1982. Mechanics of Woods and Wood Composite. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc. New York. United States.

MS 544 Part 2: 2001. Code of Practice for Structural Use of Timber. Department of Standard. Malaysia. Department of Standard. Malaysia.

Branco, J., Varum, H., Cruz, P. 2006. Structural Grades of Timber by Bending and Compression Tests. Materials Science Forum Vols. 514-516, Portugal. 1663-1667.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-20

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

TORSIONAL SHEAR STRENGTH PROPERTIES OF MALAYSIAN TROPICAL TIMBER IN STRUCTURAL SIZE. (2020). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 82(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v82.13984