EFFICIENCY OF TRADITIONAL DNA EXTRACTION METHOD IN PCR DETECTION OF PORCINE DNA IN MEAT MIXTURES

Authors

  • Zaliha Suadi Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science and Resource Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Lesley Maurice Bilung Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science and Resource Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Kasing Apun Department of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science and Resource Technology, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, 94300, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Aida Azrina Azmi Halal Products Research Institute, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400 UPM Serdang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v82.14636

Keywords:

Meat adulteration, PCIA extraction method, porcine DNA, PCR, cytochrome b

Abstract

Through the advancement of biotechnology, DNA-based methods are the most effective techniques in species identification, as they are rapid and have higher stability in harsh conditions compared to protein-based methods. This study was conducted to determine the efficiency of the traditional DNA extraction method, phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (PCIA), and comparing it with the commercially available kit by evaluating the purity, concentration, and suitability for amplification of porcine DNA in raw chicken and beef mixtures. The quantity and quality of the DNA extracts were assessed using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed using species-specific primers targeting mitochondrial DNA cytochrome b (cyt b) gene of chicken (227-bp), beef (274-bp), and pork (398-bp), to confirm the template usability and quality of the DNA extracts. High DNA concentrations and purity were obtained from meat samples extracted using the PCIA method. The visualization of pork DNA on 2% agarose gel was able to detect pork contamination in raw meat mixtures up to minute proportion (1%). The existence of pork in chicken and beef was indicated with the presence of a specific 398-bp DNA band. Thus, the PCIA method can be recommended as a cost-effective and an excellent alternative to more expensive extraction kits in detecting pork DNA in raw meat mixtures.

References

Mohammad Nor, N. A. A., and Rosali, M. H. 2015. The Development and Future Direction of Malaysia’s Livestock Industry. FFTC Agricultural Policy Articles. FFTC Agricultural Policy Platform Website: http://ap.fftc.agnet.org/ap_db.php?id=529&print=1.

Rahmati, S., Muhd Julkapli, N., A. Yehye, W., and Basirun, W. J. 2016. Identification of Meat Origin in Food Products – A Review. Food Control 68: 379-390

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.04.013.

Salahudin, A., Ramli, M. A., Zulkepli, M. I. S., and Abd Razak, M. I. 2017. Issues in Halal Meat Product and Authentication Technology from Islamic Perspectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences. 7(12): 1305-1315

DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i12/3768.

Nakyinsige, K., Man, Y. B., and Sazili, A. Q. 2012. Halal Authenticity Issues in Meat and Meat Products. Meat Science. 91(3): 207-214.

Ali, M. E., Kashif, M., Uddin, K., Hashim, U., Mustafa, S. and Che Man, Y. B. 2012. Species Authentication Methods in Foods and Feeds: The Present, Past, and Future of Halal Forensics. Food Analytical Methods. 5: 935-955

DOI: 10.1007/s12161-011-9357-3.

Ha, J., Kim, S., Lee, J., Lee, S., Lee, H., Choi, Y., Oh, H., and Yoon, Y. 2017. Identification of Pork Adulteration in Processed Meat Products using the Developed Mitochondrial DNA-Based Primers. Korean Journal for Food Science of Animal Resources. 37(3): 464-468.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.3.464.

Bhat, M. M., Mantoo, I. A., Salahuddin, M., Adil, S., and Pal, M. A. 2016. Meat Adulteration in Cooked Mutton Kebab with Cattle and Buffalo Meat and Its Detection using Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) Based Multiplex PCR. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 11: 505-510.

DOI: 10.3923/ajava.2016.505.510.

Aida, A. A., Che Man, Y. B., C. M. V. L., Raha, A. R., and Son, R. 2005. Analysis of Raw Meats and Fats using Polymerase Chain Reaction for Halal Authentication. Meat Science. 69: 47-52

Murugaiah, C., Noor, Z. M., Mastakim, M., Bilung, L. M., Selamat, J., and Radu, S. 2009. Meat Species Identification and Halal Authentication Analysis Using Mitochondrial DNA. Meat Science. 83: 57-61.

Tanabe, S., Miyauchi, E, Muneshige, A., Mio, K., Sato, C. and Sato, M. 2007. PCR Method of Detecting Pork in Foods for Verifying Allergen Labeling and for Identifying Hidden Pork Ingredients in Processed Foods. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 71(7): 1663-1667.

DOI: 10.1271/bbb.70075.

Auricchio, B., Anniballi, F., Fiore, A., Skiby, J. E., and De Medici, D. 2013. Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods Suitable for PCR-Based Detection and Genotyping of Clostridium Botulinum. Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefense Strategy, Practice, and Science. 11(1): 200-206.

Djurkin Kusec, I., Radisic, Z., Komlenic, M., and Kusec, G. 2015. Comparison of Commercial DNA Kits and Traditional DNA Extraction Procedure in PCR Detection of Pork in Dry/Fermented Sausages. Poljoprivreda. 21(1 Supplement): 199-202.

Santos, André Luís F., Oliveira, Carolina Q. P., Arruda, Geovana Nicole P. N., & Martins, John Kenned. 2018. Comparison of DNA Extraction Using Proteinase K and Extraction Kit: Analysis of the Quality of the Genetic Material. Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial. 54(2): 70-75.

DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5935/1676-2444.20180013.

Sajali, N., Sie, C. W., Hanapi, U. K., Abu Bakar @ Jamaluddin, S., Tasrip, N. A., and Mohd Desa, M. N. 2018. The Challenges of DNA Extraction in Different Assorted Food Matrices: A Review. Journal of Food Sciences. 83(10): 2409-2414.

Matsunaga, T., Chikuni, K., Tanabe, R., Muroya, S., Shibata, K., Yamada, J., and Shinmura, Y. 1999. A Quick and Simple Method for the Identification of Meat Species and Meat Products by PCR Assay. Meat Science. 51: 143-148.

Ozsensoy, Y. and Sahin, S. 2016. Comparison of Different DNA Isolation Methods and Use of Dodecyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide (DTAB) for the Isolation of DNA from Meat Products. Journal of Advanced Veterinary and Animal Research. 3(4): 368-374.

Ni’mah, A., Kartikasari, Y., Pratama, A. D., Kartikasari, L. R., Hertanto, B. S., and Cahyadi, M. 2016. Detection of Pork Contamination in Fresh and Cooked Beef using Genetic Marker Mitochondrial-DNA Cytochrome B by Duplex-PCR. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture. 41(1): 7-12.

Novianty, E., Kartikasari, L. R., Lee, J. H., and Cahyadi, M. 2017. Identification of Pork Contamination in Meatball using Genetic Marker Mitochondrial DNA Cytochrome b Gene by Duplex-PCR. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering 193: 012002.

DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/193/1/012002.

Montowska, M., and Pospiech, E. 2011. Authenticity Determination of Meat and Meat Products on the Protein and DNA Basis. Food Reviews International. 27: 84-100.

DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2010.518297.

Chaobo, X., Feng, G., Pingya, W., Jin, Z., and Yuanyuan, L. (2017). Development and Utility of a Tri-Primer PCR for Simultaneous Detection of Cattle, Sheep, and Pig in Meat Products. International Food Research Journal. 24(1): 159-163.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-10

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

EFFICIENCY OF TRADITIONAL DNA EXTRACTION METHOD IN PCR DETECTION OF PORCINE DNA IN MEAT MIXTURES. (2020). Jurnal Teknologi, 82(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v82.14636