Persepsi Pelajar Terhadap Hasil Pembelajaran Bidang Kejuruteraan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v62.1758Keywords:
Hasil pembelajaran bidang kejuruteraan, analisis faktor penerokaan, analisis faktor pengesahanAbstract
Makalah ini bertujuan untuk menentusahkan elemen penting dalam hasil pembelajaran dari segi persepsi pelajar yang terlibat dalam bidang kejuruteraan bagi meningkatkan kualiti perkhidmatan sektor pengajian tinggi (IPT) khususnya universiti. Kajian ini melibatkan 500 orang responden dari lima buah IPT terpilih di Malaysia. Instrumen soal selidik berskala Likert 7 markat digunakan untuk mendapatkan maklum balas. Secara keseluruhannya, soal selidik mencapai tahap kebolehpercayaan yang tinggi dengan nilai alfa Cronbach 0.967. Data yang diperoleh diproses melalui analisis faktor penerokaan (EFA) untuk melihat struktur faktor-faktor hasil pembelajaran. Tambahan itu, analisis faktor pengesahan (CFA) juga dilakukan bagi menentusahkan konstruk yang terumpuk. Kesimpulannya, hasil kajian daripada dua analisis berkenaan dapat mengenal pasti dan mengesahkan dua elemen penting dalam hasil pembelajaran bidang kejuruteraan dari segi (i) persepsi dalam pengetahuan bidang teknikal dan (ii) persepsi dalam pengetahuan bidang umum.
References
Ab Hamid, M.R. 2012. Model Kecemerlangan Prestasi berasaskan Nilai Teras: Pendekatan Pemodelan Persamaan Struktur. Tesis PhD. Tidak Diterbitkan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Aldridge, S., & Rowley, J. 1998. Measuring Student Satisfaction in Higher Education. Quality Assurance in Education. 6(4): 197–204.
Bearden, W. O., & Teel, J. E. 1983. Selected Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction and Complaint Reports. Journal of Marketing Research. XX: 21–28.
Biggs, J. 1999. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham, Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Birenbaum, M. 1994. Toward Adaptive Assessment—The Students’ Angle, Studies in Educational Evaluation. 20: 239–255.
Birenbaum, M. 1997. Assessment Preferences and Their Relationship to Learning Strategies and Orientations. Higher Education. 33: 71–84.
Birenbaum, M. & Feldman, R. 1998. Relationships Between Learning Patterns and Attitudes Towards Two Assessment Formats. Educational Research. 40(1): 90–98.
Byrne, B.M. 2010. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS. Edisi ke-2. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Cheng, Y. C., & Tam, M. 1997. Multi-models of quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education. 5(1): 22-31.
Child, D. 1990. The Essentials of Factor Analysis. Second Ed. London: Cassel Educational Limited.
Chua, Y.P. 2009. Statistik Penyelidikan Lanjutan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw Hill Malaysia.
Elliot, K. & Shin, D. 2002. Student Satisfaction: An Alternative Approach to Assessing This Important Concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 24: 197–209
Gale, H.R. & Thomas, M.H. 1982. A Technology for Test-Item Writing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovonavich Publishers.
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis. Fourth Ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Marton, F. & Säljö, R. 1976. On qualitative differences in learning. II—outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 46: 115–127.
Mont, O. & Plepys, A. 2003. Customer Satisfaction: Review of Literature and Application to the Product-Service Systems. Final Report to the Society for Non-traditional Technology, Japan. Lund University Sweden.
Mustafa, Z., Jane, T.S. & Ab Hamid, M.R. 2011. Kajian Kepuasan Pelajar Kejuruteraan Universiti di Malaysia Menggunakan Pemodelan Persamaan Berstruktur. Journal of Quality Measurement and Analysis. 7(1): 117–127.
Mustafa, Z., Basri, N., Zainal Abidin, N., Mohd Suradi, N.R., Mohd Ali, Z., Ahmad Shahabudin, F.A. & Ab Hamid, M.R. 2012. Modeling of Engineering Student Satisfaction in Malaysia. Journal of Mathematics and Statistics. 8(1): 64–71.
Norbayani, B. 2010. Model Kepuasan Pelajar di Kalangan Pelajar Kejuruteraan di Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana, Pusat Pengajian Sains Matematik, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Nunnally, J. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York. MacGraw-Hill Book Company.
Oliver, R. L. & De Sarbo, W. S. 1988. Response determinants of satisfaction judgements. Journal of Consumer Research. 14: 495–507.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. 1988. SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale For Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality. Journal of Retailing. 64(1): 12–40.
Pariseau, S. E. & McDaniel, J. R. 1997. Assessing service quality in schools of business, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. MCB University Press. 14(3): 204–218.
Prosser, M. & Trigwell, K. 1999. Understanding Learning and Teaching: The Experience of Higher Education. Buckingham, SRHE & Open University Press.
Ramsden, P. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Sekaran, U. 1992. Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. 2nd ed. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
Selnes, F. 1993. An Examination of the Effect of Product Performance on Brand Reputation, Satisfaction And Loyalty. European Journal of Marketing. 27(9): 19–35.
Spreng, R. A., MacKenzie, S. B. & Olshavsky, R. W. 1996. A re-examination of the determinants of consumer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing. 60: 15–32.
Wiers-Jenssen, J., Stensaker, B. & Grogaard, J. B. 2002. Srudent Satisfaction: towards an empirical deconstruction of the concept. Quality in Higher Education. 8(2): 183–195.
Wirtz, J. & Bateson, J. E. G. 1999. Consumer satisfaction with services: integrating the environment perspective in services marketing into traditional disconfirmation paradigm. Journal of Business Research. 44: 55-66.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
