• Mahrus Salam Directorate of Nuclear Facility Management – National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jl. Babarsari PO BOX 6101 YKBB, Special Region of Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia
  • Ayu Jati Puspitasari Polytechnic Institute of Nuclear Technology – National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Jl. Babarsari PO BOX 6101 YKBB, Special Region of Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia



Dose Curve, Polynomial, Diagnostic Reference Level, Diagnostic Radiology, X-Ray Beam


A study of the dose curve to determine the dose received by a patient on the diagnostic radiology was carried out. One of the efforts to apply radiation dose optimization in diagnostic radiology is using the Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL), the dose value used as a reference for each radiological examination. The primary purpose of this study is to develop a method for determining the dose curve as a function of two variables: x-ray tube current and x-ray beam energy. Furthermore, the dose curve that has been developed can be used to estimate the value of the patient dose for each exposure factor arranged. In this study, the dose curve is determined using the polynomial model compiled using MATLAB software, and then validation is carried out using calibrated dosimeter. It shows that at a focus-to-detector distance (FDD) of 100 cm, the deviation factor is 4.89%. It meets the acceptance criteria determined, which is less than 5%. Furthermore, another validation result at FFD 50 cm shows that the average deviation value is 0.43%. In addition, the estimated dose still met the DRL criteria, where the estimated dose obtained for thorax AP and abdominal examinations are 0.26 mGy and 1.5 mGy, respectively. These values were still below the Indonesian Diagnostic Reference Level (IDRL) criteria determined by the Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPETEN), which are 0.4 mGy and 10 mGy for thorax AP and abdominal, respectively.


J. Nakashima and H. Duong. 2022. Radiology, Image Production, and Evaluation. StatPearls Publishing.

Z. Somosy. 2000. Radiation Response of Cell Organelles. Micron. 31(2): 165-181. Doi: 10.1016/S0968-4328(99)00083-9.

N. Foray, M. Bourguignon, and N. Hamada. 2016. Individual Response to Ionizing Radiation. Mutat. Res. - Rev. Mutat. Res. 770: 369-386. Doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.09.001.

H. Zhao et al. 2019. Effects of Different Doses of X-ray Irradiation on Cell Apoptosis, Cell Cycle, DNA Damage Repair and Glycolysis in HeLa cells. Oncol. Lett. 17(1): 42-54. Doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9566.

D. R. Dance, S. Christofides, A. D. A. Maidment, I. D. McLean, and K. H. Ng. 2014. Diagnostic Radiology Physics, Non-serial Publications. Diagnostic Radiol. Phys. 1-681.

L. Cheng. 2019. Factors Modifying Cellular Response to Ionizing Radiation. Stockholm University.

Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency of Indonesia (BAPETEN). 2020. Radiation Safety in the Use of X-ray Machine in the Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (4/2020). Indonesia. 1-52.

J. Valentin. 2007. “Radiation Protection in Medicine: ICRP Publication 105. The International Commision on Radiological Protection. Elsevier Ltd. Doi: 10.1016/0146-6453(81)90127-5.

Indonesia Government Regulation. 2007. Safety and Security in the Use of Ionizing Radiation Source, Indonesia Government Regulation No. 33. Indonesia.

I. A. E. Agency. 2014. Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources : International Basic Safety Standards General Safety Requirements Part 3.

Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency of Indonesia. 2013. Radiation Safety in Nuclear Energy Utilization No.4.

S. Mc Fadden, T. Roding, G. de Vries, M. Benwell, H. Bijwaard, and J. Scheurleer. 2018. Digital Imaging and Radiographic Practise in Diagnostic Radiography: An Overview of Current Knowledge and Practice in Europe. Radiography. 24(2): 137-141. Doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2017.11.004.

K. N. Prasad, W. C. Cole, and G. M. Haase. 2004. Radiation Protection in Humans: Extending the Concept of as Low as Reasonably Achievable (ALARA) from Dose to Biological Damage. Br. J. Radiol. 77(914): 97-99. Doi: 10.1259/bjr/88081058.

B. B. Joseph and S. George. 2021. The Road to Radiation Safety and ALARA: A Review. IP Int. J. Maxillofac. Imaging. 6(4): 89-92. Doi: 10.18231/j.ijmi.2020.022.

I. I. Suliman. 2020. Estimates of Patient Radiation Doses in Digital Radiography Using DICOM Information at a Large Teaching Hospital in Oman. J. Digit. Imaging. 33(1): 64-70. Doi: 10.1007/s10278-019-00199-y.

International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). 2007. Radiological Protection and Safety in Medicine: ICRP Publication 73.

J. Damilakis. 2016. Establishing and Monitoring DRLS. Phys. Medica. 32: 179-180. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.07.296.

P. I. Wulandari. 2018. Diagnostic Reference Levels: A Review. J. Med. Sci. Clin. Res. 6(12). Doi: 10.18535/jmscr/v6i12.80.

Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency of Indonesia. 2021. Indonesia Diagnostic Reference Level for X-Ray CT-Scan and General Rafiography (No. 1211/K/V/2021). Indonesia. 4.

T. Amalia, B. Zulkarnaien, C. Anam, K. Nurcahyo, H. Tussyadiah, and D. E. Pradana. 2022. The Establishment of Institutional Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs) in the Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital. Atom Indones. 48(2): 159-167. Doi: 10.17146/aij.2022.1131.

International Commission on Radiological Protection. 2017. Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging: ICRP Publication 135. 46(1).

IAEA. 2011. IAEA Human Health Series No.4-Implementation of the International Code of Practice on Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology. Review of Testing Results. International Atomic Energy Agency. No. Trs 457. 1-127. [Online]. Available:

R. I. Prasetya and G. B. Suparta. 2022. Location Analysis for Additional Permanent Radiation Detector in XRay Radiography Unit. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 12(3): 1080-1084. Doi: 10.18517/ijaseit.12.3.15804.

Z. M. Rashid, S. N. Kbah, and Z. H. Al-sawaff. 2020. An Estimation of X-radiation Dose using kVp and mAs. Solid State Technol. 63(3): 3423-3428.

Z. Arifin, E. Hidayanto, B. Rahayuningsih, and A. A. Putriz. 2019. Evaluation of Dose Radiation on X-ray Radiography. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1217(1). Doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1217/1/012035.

G. Kareliotis. 2015. Study of kVp and mAs Effect on Radiation Dose and Image Quality in Computed Tomography. 2015: 1-99.

Nuclear Energy Regulatory Agency of Indonesia. 2018. Compliance Tests in X-Ray Radiology Diagnostic and Intervention (No.2).

F. T. Tehrani. 2020. Solution to Polynomial Equations, a New Approach. Appl. Math. 11(02): 53-66. Doi: 10.4236/am.2020.112006.

K. F. Riley, M. P. Hobson, and S. J. Bence. 2006. Mathematical Methods for Physics and Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.






Science and Engineering

How to Cite