Pembelajaran Kosa Kata Bahasa Arab Secara Aturan Kluster Semantik dan Aturan Kluster Bebas

Authors

  • Nik Mohd Rahimi Fakulti Pendidikan UKM, 43600 UKM, Bangi Selangor, Malaysia
  • Zahriah Hussin Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Aras 1, Blok E8, Kompleks E, Pusat Pentadbiran Kerajaan Persekutuan, 62604, Putrajaya, Malaysia
  • Wan Normeza Universiti Teknologi Malaysia International Campus, Jalan Semarak, 54100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v67.2067

Keywords:

Arabic vocabularies learning, vocabularies learning strategy, vocabularies acquisition, semantic clustering, semantically unrelated clustering

Abstract

Many Arabic language books use semantic clustering in presenting their vocabularies. However, some language experts suggest the use of semantically unrelated clustering due to a higher contribution in memorizing vocabularies among students. This study aims to investigate on which clustering has a higher contribution in memorizing vocabularies among students. The specific objectives of this study are; (a) to identify the level of students’ achievement in memorizing vocabularies using both techniques in a long-term test and a short-term test; and (b) to identify students’ achievement differences using both techniques in both tests. This study is a quasi-experimental study which using a short term and a long term post-test. This group of students was exposed to vocabularies using semantic clustering and semantically unrelated clustering. The short term post test was administered after the students were exposed with both techniques, while the long term post-test was used after seven days of the exposure. This study found that students’ achievement using semantic clustering was moderate for both tests. Meanwhile, students’ achievement using semantically unrelated clustering was very good in the short term test and good in the long term test. On the other hand, the t-test analysis showed that there are significant differences between both techniques, which students’ achievement using semantically unrelated clustering is statistically and significantly higher than students’ achievement using semantic clustering for both short and long term post-tests. Therefore, this study suggests that the semantically unrelated clustering technique needs to be used in learning Arabic vocabularies among students. 

References

Aitchison, J. 1996. Taming the Wilderness: Words in the Mental Lexicon. Words, Words, Words: The Translator and the Language Learner. England: Multilingual Matters Ltd. 15–26.

Asma Abdul Rahman dan Nik Mohd Rahimi. 2012. Al-Awamil al-muassirah fi taklim al-lughah al-ajnabiyah wa turuq tadris al-maharat al-lugawiyah al-arabiyah. Nilai: Penerbit Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia.

Beddeley, A. D. 1990. Human Memory: Theory and Practice. New York: Allyn and Bacon.

Erten, I. H., Tekin, M. 2008. Effects on Vocabulary Acquisition of Presenting New Words in Semantic Sets Versus Semantically Unrelated Sets. System. 36: 407–422

Finkbeiner, M. & Nicol, J. 2003. Semantic Category Effects in Second Language Word Learning. Applied Psycholinguistics. 24: 369–383.

Ghazali Yusri, Nik Mohd Rahimi, Parilah M. Shah & Wan Haslina Wah. 2013. Cognitive and Metacognitive Learning Strategies Among Arabic Language Students. Interactive Learning Environments. 21(3): 290–300.

Haycraft, J. 1993. An Introduction to English Language Teaching. Singapore: Longman.

Kamarul Shukri Mat Teh, Mohamed Amin Embi, Nik Mohd Rahimi Nik Yusoff & Zamri Mahamod. 2009. Strategi Metafizik: Kesinambungan Penerokaan Domain Strategi Utama Pembelajaran Bahasa. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 9(2): 1–13.

Mohamad bin Seman, Mohamad Afifi bin Abdullah, Rosli bin Osman & Hasmadi bin Hamdan. 2007. Bahasa Arab Tingkatan 1. Selangor Darul Ehsan: Synergymate Sdn. Bhd.

Mohd Ja’afar bin Ab. Latif. 2006. Pendekatan Komunikatif Dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Arab Komunikasi Sekolah Kebangsaan: Kajian di Sekolah-sekolah dalam Daerah Hulu Langat, Selangor. Disertasi Ijazah Sarjana Pengajian Islam, Fakulti Pengajian Islam, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

Mohd Zaki Mat, Mohd Shukri Hamzah & Khairil Mukhtar. 2002. Bahasa Arab Komunikasi Tingkatan Satu. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Nation, I. S. P. 2001. Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nik Mohd Rahimi, Kamarulzaman Abd. Ghani, dan Mowafak al-Qusyairi. 2008. Fan tadris al-lughah al-arabiyah li ghair al-arab. Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan UKM.

Nik Mohd Rahimi, Harun Baharudin, Ghazali Yusri, Kamarul Shukri Mat Teh, Mohamed Amin Embi. 2010. Pembelajaran Konsonan Mengikut Pelat Bahasa Melayu. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies. 10(3): 1–15.

Oxford, R. 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House.

Papathanasiou, E. 2009. An investigation of Two Ways of Presenting Vocabulary. ELT Journal. 63/4: 313–322.

Schmitt, N. 2000. Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Seal, B. D. 1991. Vocabulary Learning and Teaching. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 296-311. USA: Henlei and Henlei Publishers.

Tinkham, T. 1993. The Effect of Semantic Clustering on the Learning of Second Language Vocabulary. System. 21: 371–380.

Tuaiymah Rushdi & Abu Shanb, Ahmad Jum’ah. 1990. al-Maharat al-lugahwiyyah wa mustawayatuha: Tahlil nafsi lughawi, dirasat midaniyyah. Arab Saudi: Jami’ah Umm al-Qura.

Waring, R. 1997. The Negative Effects of Learning Words in Semantic Sets: A Replication. System. 25: 261–274.

Zahriah Hussein. 2011. Perbandingan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Perbendaharaan Kata Bahasa Arab mengikut kluster semantik dan kluster bebas. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2014-04-13

Issue

Section

Social Sciences

How to Cite

Pembelajaran Kosa Kata Bahasa Arab Secara Aturan Kluster Semantik dan Aturan Kluster Bebas. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 67(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v67.2067