Magnetic Induction Tomography: Receiver Circuit and Its Design Criteria

Authors

  • Zulkarnay Zakaria Tomography Imaging Research Group, School of Mechatronic Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, 02600, Arau, Perlis, Malaysia
  • Muhammad Saiful Badri Mansor Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,UTM Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia
  • Ruzairi Abdul Rahim Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,UTM Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia
  • Ibrahim Balkhis Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,UTM Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia
  • Mohd Hafiz Fazalul Rahiman Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,UTM Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia
  • Nor Muzakkir Nor Ayob Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,UTM Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia
  • Herlina Abdul Rahim Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,UTM Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia
  • Sazali Yaacob Process Tomography and Instrumentation Engineering Research Group (PROTOM-i), Infocomm Research Alliance, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia,UTM Skudai, Johor 81310, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2138

Keywords:

Magnetic induction tomography, frame rate, components selection, industrial process, biomedical

Abstract

This paper discusses the receiver circuit and criteria for component selection towards the application of a real-time magnetic induction tomography system. Component selection plays an important role since image reconstruction of the object of interest with high quality and at a higher frame rate cannot be achieved without the right parameter criteria. The demands for a high quality imaging system have recently been increasing, especially in industrial processes involving dynamic movement, thus this paper may provide valuable information on better magnetic induction tomography system implementation for industrial processes and biomedical imaging through the use of a coil as a transmitter and also a receiver. The linear back projection algorithm has been employed in this system and has proven capable of identifying the location and size of the object based on the reconstructed images.

References

M. Soleimani. 2008. Computational Aspects of Low Frequency Electrical and Electromagnetic Tomography: A Review Study. International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modelling. 5(3): 407–440.

H. Griffiths. 2001. Magnetic Induction Tomography. Measurement Science and Technology. 12(2): 1126–1131.

Z. Zakaria, R. Abdul Rahim, M. S. B. Mansor, S. Yaacob, N. M. Nor Ayob, S. Z. Mohd Muji, and M. H. Fazalul Rahiman. 2012. Advancements in Transmitters and Sensors for Biological Tissue Imaging in Magnetic Induction Tomography. Sensors. 12(6): 7126–7156.

R. Merwa and H. Scharfetter. 2007. Magnetic Induction Tomography: Evaluation of the Point Spread Function and Analysis of Resolution and Image Distortion. Physiological Measurement. 28(7): S313–24.

L. Ma, H.-Y. Wei, and M. Soleimani. 2012. Pipelines Inspection Using Magnetic Induction Tomography Based on a Narrowband Pass Filtering Method,†Progress In Electromagnetics Research. 23: 65–78.

W. Yin, G. Chen, L. Chen, and B. Wang. 2011. The Design of a Digital Magnetic Induction Tomography ( MIT ) System for Metallic Object Imaging Based on Half Cycle Demodulation. IEEE Sensors Journal. 11(10): 2233–2240.

R. Casanova, A. Silva, and A. R. Borges. 2004. A Quantitative Algorithm for Parameter Estimation in Magnetic Induction Tomography. Measurement Science and Technology. 15(7): 1412–1419.

Y. Maimaitijiang, H. C. Wee, A. Roula, S. Watson, R. Patz, and R. J. Williams. 2009. Evaluation of Parallel FFT Implementations on GPU and Multi-core PCs for Magnetic Induction Tomography. n WC 2009, IFMBE Proceedings 25/IV. 1889–1892.

Y. Granot, A. Ivorra, and B. Rubinsky. 2007. Frequency-division Multiplexing for Electrical Impedance Tomography in Biomedical Applications. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging. 1–9.

B. Dekdouk, W. Yin, C. Ktistis, D. W. Armitage, and A. J. Peyton. 2010. A Method to Solve the Forward Problem in Magnetic Induction Tomography Based on the Weakly Coupled Field Approximation. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 57(4): 914–21.

Burr-Brown. 1998. INA 111-High Speed FET-Input Instrumentation Amplifier. Data Sheet. 1–16.

Analog Devices. 1995. AD817-High Speed, low Power Wide Supply Range Amplifier. Data Sheet. 1–7.

NXP Semiconductors. 2004. 1N4148-High Speed Diodes. Product Data Sheet. 1–9.

Texas Instruments. 2005. ISO124-Precision Lowest-Cost Isolation Amplifier. Data Sheet. 1–18.

Intersil. 2006. HA5002-Monolithic, Wideband, High Slew Rate, High Output Current Buffer. Data Sheet. 1–7.

R. Abdul Rahim. S.Z Mohd. Muji. January 2013. Optical Tomography: Image Improvement using Mix Projection of Parallel and Fan Beam Mode. Measurement Journal (ISSN: 0263-2241) Elsevier Science. 46: 1970 – 1978.

Downloads

Published

2013-09-15

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

Magnetic Induction Tomography: Receiver Circuit and Its Design Criteria. (2013). Jurnal Teknologi, 64(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2138