Aggregate Degradation Characteristics of Stone Mastic Asphalt Mixtures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v65.2155Keywords:
Marshall, gyratory, aggregate, compaction, degradationAbstract
Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA) mixtures are designed to have a high coarse aggregate content and stone-on-stone contact, which results in more stress on the coarse aggregates during compaction and traffic loading. As a result, aggregates tend to break down more in SMA mixtures than in conventional dense graded mixtures. Aggregate degradation during compaction and traffic loading may cause changes in the original gradation and thus may also affect the volumetric parameters of SMA mixtures. Therefore, this  study was conducted to determine the degree of aggregate degradation in SMA mixtures due to the compaction process. Aggregates of two Nominal Maximum Aggregates Sizes (NMAS), designated as SMA14 and SMA20, were compacted using 50 blows of the Marshall Hammer and 100 gyrations of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC). The verified samples were then prepared and extracted using the Centrifuge Method. The relationship between aggregate degradation and influencing factors, such as compaction effort and volumetric properties were investigated. Aggregate degradation by the Marshall Hammer was found to be significantly higher than degradation by the SGC. Voids in the mineral aggregate (VMA) of either compaction method decrease or are almost the same when aggregate degradation is not significant. SGC method can be selected to represent the field roller that results in a similar trend of aggregate degradation.
References
L. M. Pierce. 2000. WSDOT Report No.SR-524. Washington State, USA.
R. B. Schimiedlin, D. L. Bischoff. 2002. Stone Matrix Asphalt: The Wisconsin Experience. Wisconsin Department of Transportation. Madison.
T. Keunnen. 2003. Better Roads Magazine. United States of America.
Malaysian Public Work Department. 2008. Standard Specification for Road Works Section 4: Flexible Pavement. JKR/SPJ/2008-S4.
National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA). 1999. Designing and Constructing SMA Mixtures: State-of-the-Practice, Quality Improvement Series 122, Landham, MD.
M. A. Ibrahim. 2006. Const Build Mater. 20: 982.
X. Hongbin, D. E. Watson. 2004. 83rd Annual Meeting of TRB. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
D. Mangan, M. Butcher. 2004. Technical Note 16 Stone Mastic Asphalt. Australian Roads Research Board. Australia.
R. Robinson, B. Thagesen (eds). 2004. Road Engineering For Development. 2nd Edition. New Fetter Lane, London: Spon Press.
N. J. Garber, L. A. Hoel. 2002. Traffic and Highway Engineering. 3rd Edition. USA: Brooks/Cole.
Y. Wu, F. Parker Jr, L. Khandal. 1998. NCAT Report No. 98-4. National Centre for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, Alabama.
E. R. Brown, R. B. Mallick. 1994. NCAT Report No. 94-2.National Centre for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, Alabama.
E. R. Brown, R. B. Mallick, A. L. Todd. 1997. NCAT Report No. 97-3. National Centre for Asphalt Technology, Auburn, Alabama.
R. Muniandy, E. E. Aburkaka. 2010. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 4: 5522-5532.
T. B. Moghaddam, M. R. Karim, T. Syammaun. 2012. Construction and Building Materials 34: 236-242.
B. D. Prowell, L. A. Cooley Jr, R. J. Schreck. 2002. Transport Research Record No. 1813, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.
B. E. Ruth, R. C. West, S. Huang, I. E. Moroni. 1998. Minimum Aggregate Quality Levels for Stone Mastic Asphalt Mixtures, University of Florida.
B. E. Gite, M. S. Abjal. 2012. http://www.engineeringcivil.com/stone-mastic-asphalt.html. (Accessed on: 15 July 2013).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.