THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON CO-PYROLYSIS OF EMPTY FRUIT BUNCH AND USED PALM COOKING OIL FOR HYDROCARBON FUEL PRODUCTION

Authors

  • Vekes Balasundram Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Norhuda Abdul Manaf Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Pramila Tamunaidu Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Jalan Sultan Yahya Petra, 54100, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Norazana Ibrahim Energy Management Group, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Ruzinah Isha Faculty of Chemical and Process Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang Al-Sultan Abdullah, 26600, Pekan, Pahang, Malaysia
  • Le Kim Hoang Pham Institute of Applied Technology and Sustainable Development, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Ho Chi Minh City, 755414, Viet Nam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v87.23147

Keywords:

Biomass, cooking oil, pyrolysis, hydrocarbons, fuel

Abstract

This research holds substantial significance in the context of renewable energy and waste management. By investigating the co-pyrolysis of empty fruit bunch (EFB) and used palm cooking oil (UPCO), the study seeks to convert biomass waste into valuable hydrocarbon fuels, thereby addressing environmental concerns associated with waste disposal. Thus, the main goal of this research is to investigate the influence of temperature on the co-pyrolysis of empty fruit bunch (EFB) and used palm cooking oil (UPCO) into hydrocarbon fuel via a fixed-bed reactor. The EFB to UPCO mass ratio was fixed at 1:1, and the temperature varied from 400 to 700°C at 50°C intervals. The generated pyrolysis oil at each temperature was analysed via Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometer for organic compositions. Pyrolysis of EFB also was investigated at 500°C for comparison purposes. The results show that adding UPCO increased the pyrolysis yield at all investigated temperatures compared to pyrolysis of EFB only, with the highest pyrolysis oil yield achieved at 600°C (44.4%). The hydrocarbon yield was also significantly influenced by UPCO with varying temperature conditions. The highest hydrocarbon yield of 64.9% was achieved at 650°C followed in descending order as follows: 700°C (63.7%) > 600 °C (48.3%), 550 °C (45.5%), 400°C (4.1%), 500°C (3.1%), 450°C (2.4%) and EFB at 500°C (0%). In pyrolysis oil, oxygenated compounds such as phenols, ketones, aldehydes, acids, furans, esters, and ethers decreased significantly by 45.5 to 64.9% from 550 °C to 700 °C. 

References

Santos, J. J. d., and Maranho, L. T. 2018. Rhizospheric Microorganisms as a Solution for the Recovery of Soils Contaminated by Petroleum: A Review. Journal of Environmental Management. 210: 104–113.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.015.

Rashidi, N. A., Chai, Y. H., and Yusup, S. 2022. Biomass Energy in Malaysia: Current Scenario, Policies, and Implementation Challenges. BioEnergy Research. 15: 1371–1386.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10392-7.

Derman, E., Abdulla, R., Marbawi, H., and Sabullah, M. K. 2018. Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunches as a Promising Feedstock for Bioethanol Production in Malaysia. Renewable Energy. 129: 285–298.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.003.

Douvartzides, S., Charisiou, N. D., Wang, W., Papadakis, V. G., Polychronopoulou, K., and Goula, M. A. 2022. Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Agricultural Residues and Dedicated Energy Crops for the Production of High Energy Density Transportation Biofuels. Part II: Catalytic Research. Renewable Energy. 189: 315–338.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.02.106.

Chang, S. H. 2018. Pyrolysis Oil Derived from Palm Empty Fruit Bunches: Fast Pyrolysis, Liquefaction and Future Prospects. Biomass and Bioenergy. 119: 263–276.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.09.033.

Costa, A. A. F. da., Pires, L. H. de. O., Padrón, D. R., Balu, A. M., Filho, G. N. da. R., Luque, R., and Nascimento, L. A. S. do. 2022. Recent Advances on Catalytic Deoxygenation of Residues for Bio-oil Production: An Overview. Molecular Catalysis. 518: 112052.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2021.112052.

Li, Y., Liang, G., Chang, L., Zi, C., Zhang, Y., Peng, Z., and Zha, W. 2021. Conversion of Biomass Ash to Different Types of Zeolites: A Review. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. 43(14): 745–1758.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1640316.

Hassan, M., Liu, Y., Naidu, R., Parikh, S. J., Du, J., Qi, F., and Willett, I. R. 2020. Influences of Feedstock Sources and Pyrolysis Temperature on the Properties of Biochar and Functionality as Adsorbents: A Meta-analysis. Science of The Total Environment. 744: 140714.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140714.

Dyer, A. C., Nahil, M. A., and Williams, P. T. 2021. Catalytic Co-pyrolysis of Biomass and Waste Plastics as a Route to Upgraded Bio-oil. Journal of the Energy Institute. 97: 27–36.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2021.03.022.

Zhong, S., Zhang, B., Liu, C., Aldeen, A. S., Mwenya, S., and Zhang, H. 2022. A Minireview on Catalytic Fast Co-pyrolysis of Lignocellulosic Biomass for Bio-oil Upgrading Via Enhancing Monocyclic Aromatics. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 164: 105544.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105544.

Esso, S. B. E., Xiong, Z., Chaiwat, W., Kamara, M. F., Longfei, X., Xu, J., Ebako, J., Jiang, L., Su, S., Hu, S., Wang, Y., and Xiang, J. 2022. Review on Synergistic Effects during Co-pyrolysis of Biomass and Plastic Waste: Significance of Operating Conditions and Interaction Mechanism. Biomass and Bioenergy. 159: 106415.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2022.106415.

Singh, D., Sharma, D., Soni, S. L., Inda, C. S., Sharma, S., Sharma, P. K., and Jhalani, A. 2021. A Comprehensive Review of Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil and Its Use as Fuel in Compression Ignition Engines: 3rd Generation Cleaner Feedstock. Journal of Cleaner Production. 307: 127299.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127299.

Dada, T. K., Islam, M. A., Duan, A. X., and Antunes, E. 2022. Catalytic Co-pyrolysis of Ironbark and Used Cooking Oil using X-strontium /Y-zeolite (X= Ni, Cu, Zn, Ag, and Fe). Journal of the Energy Institute. 104: 89–97.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2022.07.008.

Sahar, Sadaf, S., Iqbal, J., Ullah, I., Bhatti, H. N., Nouren, S., Habib-ur-Rehman, Nisar, J., and Iqbal, M. 2018. Biodiesel Production from Used Cooking Oil: An Efficient Technique to Convert Waste Into Biodiesel. Sustainable Cities and Society. 41: 220–226.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.037.

Azman, N. S., Marliza, T. S., Mijan, N. A., Hin, T. Y. H., and Khairuddin, N. 2021. Production of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil via Deoxygenation Using Ni-Mo/Ac Catalyst. Processes. 9(5): 750.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/pr9050750.

Shahdan, N. A., Balasundram, V., Ibrahim, N., and Isha, R. 2023. Thermogravimetric and Kinetic Studies on Pyrolysis of Empty Fruit Bunch Over Metal-impregnated Rice Husk Ash Catalysts. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-04000-7.

Balasundram, V., Ibrahim, N., Kasmani, R. Md., Isha, R., Hamid, M. K. A., Hasbullah, H., and Ali, R. R. 2018. Catalytic Upgrading of Sugarcane Bagasse Pyrolysis Vapours Over Rare Earth Metal (Ce) Loaded HZSM-5: Effect of Catalyst to Biomass Ratio on the Organic Compounds in Pyrolysis Oil. Applied Energy. 220: 787–799.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.141.

Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Fan, L., Zhou, N., Tian, G., Zhu, X., Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, P., and Ruan, R. 2017. Pyrolysis Oil Production from Sequential Two-step Catalytic Fast Microwave-assisted Biomass Pyrolysis. Fuel. 196: 261–268.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.116.

Yaakob, Z., Mohammad, M., Alherbawi, M., Alam, Z., and Sopian, K. 2013. Overview of the Production of Biodiesel from Waste Cooking Oil. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 18: 184–193.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.016.

Alvarez-Chavez, B. J., Godbout, S., Palacios-Rios, J. H., Le Roux, É., and Raghavan, V. 2019. Physical, Chemical, Thermal and Biological Pre-treatment Technologies in Fast Pyrolysis to Maximize Bio-oil Quality: A Critical Review. Biomass and Bioenergy. 128: 105333.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105333.

Leng, E., Guo, Y., Chen, J., Liu, S., E, J., and Xue, Y. 2022. A Comprehensive Review on Lignin Pyrolysis: Mechanism, Modeling and the Effects of Inherent Metals in Biomass. Fuel. 309: 122102.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122102.

Hu, X., Gunawan, R., Mourant, D., Hasan, M., Wu, L., Song, Y., Lievens, C., and Zhang, S. 2017. Upgrading of Pyrolysis Oil Via Acid-catalyzed Reactions in Alcohols — A Mini Review. Fuel Processing Technology. 155: 2–19.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.08.020.

Usino, D. O., Ylitervo, P., Moreno, A., Sipponen, M. H., and Richards, T. 2021. Primary Interactions of Biomass Components during Fast Pyrolysis. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 159: 105297.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105297.

Peng, C.-Y., Lan, C.-H., Lin, P.-C., and Kuo, Y.-C. 2017. Effects of Cooking Method, Cooking Oil, and Food Type on Aldehyde Emissions in Cooking Oil Fumes. J Hazard Mater. 324(Pt B): 160–167.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.10.045.

Xu, J., Guo, Y., Gao, Y., Qian, K., Wang, Y., Li, N., Wang, Y., Ran, S., Hou, X., and Zhu, Y. 2023. Catalytic Pyrolysis of Cellulose and Hemicellulose: Investigation on Furans Selectivity with Different Zeolite Structures at Microporous Scale. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis. 173: 106102.

Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2023.106102.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-13

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

THE EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON CO-PYROLYSIS OF EMPTY FRUIT BUNCH AND USED PALM COOKING OIL FOR HYDROCARBON FUEL PRODUCTION. (2025). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 87(4), 775-783. https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v87.23147