A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PLA-ABS SANDWICH STRUCTURES: EFFECT OF PROCESS PARAMETERS ON MECHANICAL PERFORMANCES AND ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Authors

  • Andri Nasution ᵃDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia ᵇDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan 20155, Indonesia
  • Sarah Iftin Atsani Center of Additive Manufacturing and Systems, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
  • Hasan Mastrisiswadi ᵃDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia ᵈDepartment of Industrial Engineering, UPN Veteran Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
  • Achmad Pratama Rifai Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia
  • Herianto Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jurnalteknologi.v88.23919

Keywords:

Fused deposition modelling; Multi nozzle 3D printing; Multi material; Energy consumption; Tensile properties

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is increasingly recognized as a sustainable technology due to its ability to minimize material usage, reduce waste, offer flexibility, and decrease the need for mass production. However, energy consumption during the processing phase raises sustainability concerns. While previous research has examined the impact of process parameters on energy consumption, most studies have been limited to single-material and single-nozzle configurations. On the other hand, the growing advancement towards the integration of multiple materials in AM warranting further investigation in multi-material context. This study addresses these gaps by investigating the effects of various process parameters in multi-material FDM printing on energy consumption, build time, dimensional accuracy, and tensile strength, focusing on two multi-material sandwich structures: PLA/ABS/PLA (PAP) and ABS/PLA/ABS (APA). The results indicate that the APA structure generally exhibits superior tensile strength, but lower dimensional accuracy compared to the PAP structure, although it consumes more energy despite variations in build time. When compared to existing literature, both structures outperform standard ABS and PLA in several key mechanical properties. Data analysis reveals a clear positive correlation between build time and energy consumption but no strong correlation between tensile strength and either build time or energy consumption. ANOVA analysis further identifies significant process parameters affecting the four key metrics, with variations observed between the PAP and APA structures. These findings underscore the importance of selecting appropriate process parameters in multi-material FDM printing to optimize both performance and sustainability.

References

Jiang, J. 2020. A Novel Fabrication Strategy for Additive Manufacturing Processes. Journal of Cleaner Production. 272: 122916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122916.

Lacroix, R., R. W. Seifert, and A. Timonina-Farkas. 2021. Benefiting from Additive Manufacturing for Mass Customization across the Product Life Cycle. Operations Research Perspectives. 8: 100201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2021.100201.

Singh, G., A. Mehta, and H. Vasudev. 2024. Sustainability of Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-024-00579-z.

Nadagouda, M. N., M. Ginn, and V. Rastogi. 2020. A Review of 3D Printing Techniques for Environmental Applications. Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering. 28: 173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coche.2020.08.002.

Javaid, M., A. Haleem, R. P. Singh, R. Suman, and S. Rab. 2021. Role of Additive Manufacturing Applications towards Environmental Sustainability. Advanced Industrial and Engineering Polymer Research. 4(4): 312–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.07.005.

Embia, G., B. R. Moharana, A. Mohamed, K. Muduli, and N. B. Muhammad. 2023. 3D Printing Pathways for Sustainable Manufacturing. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20443-2_12.

Prashar, G., H. Vasudev, and D. Bhuddhi. 2023. Additive Manufacturing: Expanding 3D Printing Horizon in Industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing. 17(5): 2221–2235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-022-00956-4.

Sartal, A., R. Bellas, A. M. Mejías, and A. García-Collado. 2020. The Sustainable Manufacturing Concept, Evolution and Opportunities within Industry 4.0: A Literature Review. Advances in Mechanical Engineering. 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814020925232.

Ingarao, G., and P. C. Priarone. 2020. A Comparative Assessment of Energy Demand and Life Cycle Costs for Additive- and Subtractive-Based Manufacturing Approaches. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 56: 1219–1229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.009.

Kokare, S., J. P. Oliveira, and R. Godina. 2023. Life Cycle Assessment of Additive Manufacturing Processes: A Review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 68: 536–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.007.

Somireddy, M., and A. Czekanski. 2020. Anisotropic Material Behavior of 3D Printed Composite Structures – Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing. Materials & Design. 195: 108953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108953.

Kumar, R., M. Kumar, and J. S. Chohan. 2021. Material-Specific Properties and Applications of Additive Manufacturing Techniques: A Comprehensive Review. Bulletin of Materials Science. 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-021-02364-y.

Sztorch, B., D. Brząkalski, D. Pakuła, M. Frydrych, Z. Špitalský, and R. E. Przekop. 2022. Natural and Synthetic Polymer Fillers for Applications in 3D Printing—FDM Technology Area. Solids. 3(3): 508–548. https://doi.org/10.3390/solids3030034.

Alzyod, H., J. Takacs, and P. Ficzere. 2023. Improving Surface Smoothness in FDM Parts through Ironing Post-Processing. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites. https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844231173059.

Herianto, Mastrisiswadi, H., A. Nasution, and S. I. Atsani. 2023. Effect of Shot Peening Parameters on PLA Parts Manufactured with Fused Deposition Modeling. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences. 55(5): 513–523. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.eng.technol.sci.2023.55.5.1.

Ngo, T. D., A. Kashani, G. Imbalzano, K. T. Q. Nguyen, and D. Hui. 2018. “Additive Manufacturing (3D Printing): A Review of Materials, Methods, Applications and Challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering. 143: 172–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012.

Stojković, J. R., et al. 2023. An Experimental Study on the Impact of Layer Height and Annealing Parameters on the Tensile Strength and Dimensional Accuracy of FDM 3D Printed Parts. Materials. 16(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16134574.

Wang, S., Y. Ma, Z. Deng, S. Zhang, and J. Cai. 2020. Effects of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters on Tensile, Dynamic Mechanical Properties of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Materials. Polymer Testing. 86: 106483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106483.

Milovanovic, A., et al. 2020. Comparative Analysis of Printing Parameters Effect on Mechanical Properties of Natural PLA and Advanced PLA-X Material. Procedia Structural Integrity. 28: 1963–1968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prostr.2020.11.019.

Mishra, P. K., P. Senthil, S. Adarsh, and M. S. Anoop. 2021. An Investigation to Study the Combined Effect of Different Infill Pattern and Infill Density on the Impact Strength of 3D Printed Polylactic Acid Parts. Composites Communications. 24: 100605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coco.2020.100605.

Srinivasan, R., W. Ruban, A. Deepanraj, R. Bhuvanesh, and T. Bhuvanesh. 2020. Effect on Infill Density on Mechanical Properties of PETG Part Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modelling. Materials Today: Proceedings. 27: 1838–1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.797.

Tanveer, M. Q., G. Mishra, S. Mishra, and R. Sharma. 2022. Effect of Infill Pattern and Infill Density on Mechanical Behaviour of FDM 3D Printed Parts—A Current Review. Materials Today: Proceedings. 62: 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.02.310.

Heidari-Rarani, M., N. Ezati, P. Sadeghi, and M. R. Badrossamay. 2022. Optimization of FDM Process Parameters for Tensile Properties of Polylactic Acid Specimens Using Taguchi Design of Experiment Method. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials. 35(12): 2435–2452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892705720964560.

Srinivasan, R., T. Pridhar, L. S. Ramprasath, N. Sree Charan, and W. Ruban. 2020. Prediction of Tensile Strength in FDM Printed ABS Parts Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Materials Today: Proceedings. 27: 1827–1832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.788.

Rasheed, A., et al. 2023. Experimental Investigation and Taguchi Optimization of FDM Process Parameters for the Enhancement of Tensile Properties of Bi-Layered Printed PLA-ABS. Materials Research Express. 10(9). https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/acf1e7.

Baca, D., and R. Ahmad. 2020. The Impact on the Mechanical Properties of Multi-Material Polymers Fabricated with a Single Mixing Nozzle and Multi-Nozzle Systems via Fused Deposition Modeling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 106(9–10): 4509–4520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-04937-3.

Yadav, D., D. Chhabra, R. Kumar Garg, A. Ahlawat, and A. Phogat. 2020. Optimization of FDM 3D Printing Process Parameters for Multi-Material Using Artificial Neural Network. Materials Today: Proceedings. 21: 1583–1591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.11.225.

Peng, T. 2016. Analysis of Energy Utilization in 3D Printing Processes. Procedia CIRP. 40: 62–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.01.055.

Ma, Z., et al. 2021. Energy Consumption Distribution and Optimization of Additive Manufacturing. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 116(11–12): 3377–3390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-021-07653-8.

Yang, W., Y. Liu, J. Chen, Y. Chen, and E. Shang. 2024. Process-Based Modeling of Energy Consumption for Multi-Material FDM 3D Printing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing and Special Equipment. https://doi.org/10.1108/jimse-10-2023-0008.

Camposeco-Negrete, C. 2020. Optimization of FDM Parameters for Improving Part Quality, Productivity and Sustainability of the Process Using Taguchi Methodology and Desirability Approach. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 5(1): 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-020-00115-9.

Lunetto, V., P. C. Priarone, M. Galati, and P. Minetola. 2020. On the Correlation between Process Parameters and Specific Energy Consumption in Fused Deposition Modelling. Journal of Manufacturing Processes. 56: 1039–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.06.002.

Enemuoh, E. U., S. Duginski, C. Feyen, and V. G. Menta. 2021. Effect of Process Parameters on Energy Consumption, Physical, and Mechanical Properties of Fused Deposition Modeling. Polymers. 13(15): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13152406.

Giri, J., P. Shahane, S. Jachak, R. Chadge, and P. Giri. 2021. Optimization of FDM Process Parameters for Dual Extruder 3D Printer Using Artificial Neural Network. Materials Today: Proceedings. 43: 3242–3249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.899.

Poonia, V., R. Kumar, R. Kulshrestha, and K. S. Sangwan. 2023. Optimization of Specific Energy, Scrap, and Surface Roughness in 3D Printing Using Integrated ANN-GA Approach. Procedia CIRP. 116: 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2023.02.055.

Rojek, I., D. Mikołajewski, E. Dostatni, and M. Macko. 2020. AI-Optimized Technological Aspects of the Material Used in 3D Printing Processes for Selected Medical Applications. Materials. 13(23): 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235437.

Fountas, N. A., J. D. Kechagias, D. E. Manolakos, and N. M. Vaxevanidis. 2020. Single and Multi-Objective Optimization of FDM-Based Additive Manufacturing Using Metaheuristic Algorithms. Procedia Manufacturing. 51: 740–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.104.

Panda, S. K., S. Padhee, A. K. Sood, and S. S. Mahapatra. 2009. Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Process Parameters Using Bacterial Foraging Technique. Intelligent Information Management. 1(2): 89–97. https://doi.org/10.4236/iim.2009.12014.

Sood, A. K., R. K. Ohdar, and S. S. Mahapatra. 2010. Parametric Appraisal of Mechanical Property of Fused Deposition Modelling Processed Parts. Materials & Design. 31(1): 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.06.016.

Srivastava, M., S. Rathee, S. Maheshwari, and T. K. Kundra. 2018. Multi-Objective Optimisation of Fused Deposition Modelling Process Parameters Using RSM and Fuzzy Logic for Build Time and Support Material. International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing. 7(1): 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAPIDM.2018.089727.

Mohamed, O. A., S. H. Masood, J. L. Bhowmik, M. Nikzad, and J. Azadmanjiri. 2016. Effect of Process Parameters on Dynamic Mechanical Performance of FDM PC/ABS Printed Parts through Design of Experiment. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance. 25(7): 2922–2935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-016-2157-6.

Liu, X., M. Zhang, S. Li, L. Si, J. Peng, and Y. Hu. 2017. Mechanical Property Parametric Appraisal of Fused Deposition Modeling Parts Based on the Gray Taguchi Method. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 89(5): 2387–2397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9263-3.

Aihemaiti, P., H. Jiang, W. Aiyiti, and A. Kasimu. 2021. Optimization of 3D Printing Parameters of Biodegradable Polylactic Acid/Hydroxyapatite Composite Bone Plates. International Journal of Bioprinting. 8(1): 490. https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.490.

Torres, J., M. Cole, A. Owji, Z. DeMastry, and A. P. Gordon. 2016. An Approach for Mechanical Property Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling with Polylactic Acid via Design of Experiments. Rapid Prototyping Journal. 22(2): 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/RPJ-07-2014-0083.

De Bernardez, L., G. Campana, M. Mele, J. Sanguineti, C. Sandre, and S. M. Mur. 2023. Effects of Infill Patterns on Part Performances and Energy Consumption in Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Fused Filament Fabrication via Industrial-Grade Machine. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 8(2): 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00316-4.

Lopez, D. M. B., and R. Ahmad. 2020. Tensile Mechanical Behaviour of Multi-Polymer Sandwich Structures via Fused Deposition Modelling. Polymers. 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12030651.

Torres, J., J. Cotelo, J. Karl, and A. P. Gordon. 2015. Mechanical Property Optimization of FDM PLA in Shear with Multiple Objectives. JOM. 67(5): 1183–1193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y.

Abeykoon, C., P. Sri-Amphorn, and A. Fernando. 2020. Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Parameters for Improved PLA and ABS 3D Printed Structures. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture. 3(3): 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2020.03.003.

V-Niño, E. D., A. Díaz Lantada, E. Mejía Ospino, A. Santos, R. Cabanzo Hernández, and J. L. Endrino. 2024. 3D Printed Polymer-Matrix Loaded with Graphene Oxide. Materials Letters. 372: 137012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2024.137012.

Braconnier, D. J., R. E. Jensen, and A. M. Peterson. 2020. Processing Parameter Correlations in Material Extrusion Additive Manufacturing. Additive Manufacturing. 31: 100924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.100924.

Saeed, S., A. Eltahir, R. Gomaa, and Ç. Yilmaz. 2024. Effect of Strain Rate on the Tensile Properties of 3D-Printed PLA Specimens with Fused Deposition Modelling. Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering. 5: 37–46. https://doi.org/10.14744/ytu.jame.2024.00006.

Pop, S. I., M. Dudescu, L. R. Contac, and R. V. Pop. 2023. Evaluation of the Tensile Properties of Polished and Unpolished 3D SLA- and DLP-Printed Specimens Used for Surgical Guides Fabrication. Acta Stomatologica Marisiensis Journal. 6(1): 14–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/asmj-2023-0003.

De Bernardez, L., G. Campana, M. Mele, J. Sanguineti, C. Sandre, and S. M. Mur. 2023. Effects of Infill Patterns on Part Performances and Energy Consumption in Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene Fused Filament Fabrication via Industrial-Grade Machine. Progress in Additive Manufacturing. 8(2): 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-022-00316-4.

Fountas, N. A., J. D. Kechagias, D. E. Manolakos, and N. M. Vaxevanidis. 2020. Single and Multi-Objective Optimization of FDM-Based Additive Manufacturing Using Metaheuristic Algorithms. Procedia Manufacturing. 51: 740–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.104.

Kam, M., A. Ipekçi, and Ş. Şengül. 2022. Taguchi Optimization of Fused Deposition Modeling Process Parameters on Mechanical Characteristics of PLA+ Filament Material. Scientia Iranica. 29(1B): 79–89. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2021.57012.5020.

Kananathan, J., K. Rajan, M. Samykano, K. Kadirgama, K. Moorthy, and M. M. Rahman. 2023. Preliminary Tensile Investigation of FDM Printed PLA/Coconut Wood Composite. In Technological Advancement in Instrumentation & Human Engineering, edited by M. H. A. Hassan, M. H. Zohari, K. Kadirgama, N. A. N. Mohamed, and A. Aziz, 339–350. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Milde, J., R. Hrušecký, R. Zaujec, L. Morovic, and A. Görög. 2017. Research of ABS and PLA Materials in the Process of Fused Deposition Modeling Method. Annals of DAAAM & Proceedings of the International DAAAM Symposium. 812–820. https://doi.org/10.2507/28th.daaam.proceedings. 114.

Alafaghani, A., A. Qattawi, B. Alrawi, and A. Guzman. 2017. Experimental Optimization of Fused Deposition Modelling Processing Parameters: A Design-for-Manufacturing Approach. Procedia Manufacturing. 10: 791–803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.079.

Zharylkassyn, B., A. Perveen, and D. Talamona. 2021. Effect of Process Parameters and Materials on the Dimensional Accuracy of FDM Parts. Materials Today: Proceedings. 44: 1307–1311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.11.332.

Zohdi, N., and R. C. Yang. 2021. Material Anisotropy in Additively Manufactured Polymers and Polymer Composites: A Review. Polymers. 13(19): 3368. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13193368.

Vidakis, N., J. D. Kechagias, M. Petousis, F. Vakouftsi, and N. Mountakis. 2023. The Effects of FFF 3D Printing Parameters on Energy Consumption. Materials and Manufacturing Processes. 38 (8): 915–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2022.2105882.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-27

Issue

Vol. 88 No. 2: March 2026

Section

Science and Engineering

License

Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.