The Importance of Acoustic Quality in Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v70.3581Keywords:
Acoustic quality, room acoustics, reverberation time, kenaf fiberAbstract
An effective learning process in a classroom with good speech intelligibility requires good acoustic quality. Low acoustic quality may cause frequent speech repetition and consequently leads to several emotional disorders among the students. The purpose of this study is to improve the acoustic quality of the classroom for a better learning process. Two classrooms at Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia have been selected for this study. Reverberation time is the most important factor in acoustics, which was determined using theoretical calculations and simulations. A Dass-21 of self-report questionnaires was used to measure the levels of depression, anxiety, and stress among the students. Â The results showed that reverberation times of the classrooms were more than 1 second and 34% of the students have suffered from severe and extreme anxiety. The acoustic quality can be improved through the replacement of a painted concrete wall with high sound absorption material made of kenaf fiber in order to ensure reverberation time does not exceed the limit.
References
Sanders, D. A. 1965. Noise Conditions in Normal School Classrooms. Exceptional Children. 31: 341–351.
Markides, A. 1986. Speech Levels and Speech-to-Noise Ratios. British Journal of Audiology. 20: 115–120.
Pekkarinen, E., and Viljanen, V. 1991. Acoustic Conditions for Speech Communication in Classrooms. Scandinavian Audiology. 20: 257–263.
Hetu, R., Truchon-Gagnon, C., and Bilodeau, S. 1990. Problems of Noise in School Settings: A Review of Literature and the Results of an Exploratory Study. Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology. 14: 31–39.
Bradley, J. S., Reich, R. D., and Norcross, S. G. 1999. On the Combined Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Room Acoustics on Speech Intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 106: 1820–1829.
Zannin, P. H. T., and Zwirtes, D. P. Z. 2009. Evaluation of the Acoustic Performance of Classrooms in Public Schools. Applied Acoustics. 70: 626–635.
Evans, G. W., Hygge, S., and Bullinger, M. 1995. Chronic Noise and Psychological Stress. Psychological Science. 6: 333–338.
Lundquist, P., Holmberg, K., and Landstrom, U. 2000. Annoyance and Effects on Work from Environmental Noise at School. Noise and Health. 8: 39–46.
MacKenzie, D. 2000. Noise Sources and Levels in UK Schools. Proceedings of International Symposium on Noise Control and Acoustics for Educational Buildings, Proceedings of the Turkish Acoustical Society, Istanbul, 97–106.
Haines, M. M., Stansfeld, S. A., Berglund, R. F., and Head, J. 2001. Chronic Aircraft Noise Exposure, Stress Responses, Mental Health and Cognitive Performance in School Children. Psychological Medicine. 31: 265–277.
Maxwell, L., and Evans, G. 2000. The Effects of Noise on Pre-school Children’s Pre-reading Skills. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 20: 91–97.
Dockrell, J. E., and Shield, B. 2004. Children’s Perceptions of Their Acoustic Environment at School and at Home. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 115: 2964–2973.
Hagen, M., Huber, L., and Kahlert, J. 2002. Acoustic School Designing. In Forum Acusticum. Seville, Spain.
Westman, J. C., and Walters, J. R. 1981. Noise and Stress: A Comprehensive Approach. Environ. Health Perspect. 41: 291–309
Cohen, S., and Spacapan, S. 1984. The Social Psychology of Noise. In Noise and Society, edited by D. M. Jones and A. J. Chapman, 221–245, Chichester, England: Wiley.
Evans, G. W., and Lepore, S. J. 1993. Nonauditory Effects of Noise on Children: A Critical Review. Children’s Environments. 10: 31–51.
Lercher, P. 1996. Environmental Noise and Health: An Integrated Research Perspective. Environment International. 22: 117–129.
Harun, M. and Said, A. K. 2007. Acoustics Challenges in Mosques. In: Contemporary Issues on Mosques Acoustics. Malaysia, Penerbit UTM, Johor. 15–22.
Abd. Rahman, T., Ibrahim, M. N. and Jaafar, M. Y. 2007. Effect of Delay of Sound Reflection on Speech Intelligibility. In: Contemporary Issues on Mosques Acoustics.Malaysia, Penerbit UTM, Johor. 99–107.
Bronzaft, A. L., and McCarthy, D. P. 1975. The Effect of Elevated Train Noise on Reading Ability. Environment and Behaviour. 7(4): 517–527.
Harun, M., Ibrahim, M. N., Abd. Rahman, T. and Said, A. K. 2007. Speech Intelligibility Evaluation by Means of Objective Measures. In: Contemporary Issues on Mosques Acoustics. Malaysia, Penerbit UTM, Johor. 99–107.
Vallet, M. 2000. Some European Standards on Noise in Educational Buildings. Proceedings of International Symposium on Noise Control and Acoustics for Educational Buildings, Proceedings of the Turkish Acoustical Society, Istanbul. 13–20.
World Health Organization. 1999. Guidelines for Community Noise. http://www.who.int/peh/.
Bistafa, S., and Bradley, J. 1999. Reverberation Time and Maximum Background Noise Level for Classrooms from a Comparative Study of Speech Intelligibility Metrics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 107(2): 861.
Acoustical Society of America. 2000. ANSI S12.60 American National Standard Acoustical Performance Criteria, Design Requirements, and Guidelines for Schools. Melville, New York.
Mohammed Bashir, F., Ahmad, M. H. and Jibril, J. D. 2014. Green Building Components used in Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Design Studio. Advanced Materials Research. 935: 44–47.
Ula, M., Mohd Azami, M. S. I., Mohd Hanafiah, M. N., Abd Hamid, S. H., Abd Rahman, F. and Muhamod Adzim, S. D. A. 2007. Reverberation time of Masjid Jamek Yong Peng and Masjid Kampung Rimba Terjun, Johor. In: Contemporary Issues On Mosques Acoustics. Malaysia, Penerbit UTM, Johor. 57–73.
Lovibond, P. F., and Lovibond, S. H. 1995. The Structure of Negative Emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behavior Research and Therapy. 33: 335–343.
Mahjoub, R., Mohamad Yatim, J., Mohd. Sam, A. R. and Hashemi, S. H. 2014. Tensile Properties of Kenaf Fiber due to Various Conditions of Chemical Fiber Surface Modifications. Construction and Building Materials. 55: 103–113.
Parkin, P. H., Allen, W. A., Purkis, H. J., and Scholes, W. E. 1953. The Acoustics of the Royal Festival Hall, London. Journal of Acoustical Society of America. 25(2): 246–259.
Skarlatos, D., and Manatakis, M. 2003. Effects of Classroom Noise on Students and Teachers in Greece. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 96: 539–544.
Hoeksema, S. N. 2011. Abnormal Psychology. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
Smith, B. J., Peters, R. J., and Owen, S. 1996. Acoustics and Noise Control. Addison Wesley Longman Limited, England. 46.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
