Dynamic Modulus of Western Australia Asphalt Wearing Course

Authors

  • Gunawan Wibisono Civil Engineering Department, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, WA6102, Western Australia, Australia
  • Hamid Nikraz Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru 28293, Riau, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v71.3759

Keywords:

Asphalt mixtures, dynamic modulus, master curve, MEPDG, Witczak model

Abstract

In the new AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG), the dynamic modulus |E*| test has been selected to assess the performance of asphalt concretes. The type of test, which relates asphalt mixtures modulus to temperature and time rate of loading, is never used in Western Australia. This paper presents a study on the dynamic modulus of typical Western Australia asphalt mixtures. Five mixtures with 10mm nominal sizes and two types of bitumen classes, i.e. C170 (Pen 60/80) and C320 (Pen 40/60) comply with Main Road Western Australia (MRWA) Specification were used in the research. Mixing and compacting process were carried out according to Austroads methods. The specimens were compacted using a gyratory compactor to achieve 5±0.5% target air void. Testing was performed at four temperatures (4, 20, 40 and 55OC) and six frequencies (25, 10, 5, 1, 0.5, 0.1 and 0.05 Hz). Dynamic modulus and phase angle master curves were generated from the results. The master curves were compared to the curves from Witczak’s predictive equation. From this preliminary study, it was found that the measured values correlated well with the predictive equation except at high temperatures or low frequencies. 

References

Pelinen, T.K. 2009. Complex Modulus Characterization of Asphalt Concrete. in YR Kim (ed.) Modeling of Asphalt Concrete. Sydney: ASCE Press- McGraw-Hill Construction.

Kim, Y.R., M. King, and M. Momen. 2005. Typical dynamic moduli for North Carolina asphalt concrete mixtures. FWHA Report NC/2005-03. Raleigh: North Carolina State University.

Mohammad, L.N., S. Saadeh, S. Obulareddy, and S. Cooper. 2007. Characterization of Louisiana asphalt mixtures using simple performance tests. Journal of Testing and Evaluation. 36(1): 1–12.

Kumar, S.A., and A. Veeraragavan. 2011. Dynamic mechanical characterization of asphalt concrete mixes with modified asphalt binders. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 528(21): 6445–6454.

Ceyland, H., C.W. Schwartz, K. Sunghwan, and G. Kasthurirangan. 2009. Accuracy of predictive models for dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering. 21(6): 286–293.

Austroads 2004. Pavement design – a guide to the structural design of road pavements. AP-G17/04. Sydney: Austroads.

Fakhri, M. 1997. Characterisation of asphalt pavement materials. PhD Dissertation. University of New South Wales.

Pronk, A. and S. Erkens. 2002. A Note on Fatigue Bending Tests Using a Haversine Loading. Road Materials and Pavement Design. 3(1): 95–106.

Austroads. 2006. Introduction to Asphalt Mix Design. No. AP-T62/06. Sydney: Austroads Incorporated.

AASHTO 2010. Developing Dynamic Modulus Master Curves for Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA). AASHTO PP 62. Washington D.C.: American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials.

Standards Australia. 1997. Limes and Limestones: for Building. AS. 1672.1-1997. Standards Australia Online: http://www.saiglobal.com (accessed September 02, 1999).

Austroads. 2009. Austroads Technical Report: Preparation of Asphalt Samples for Testing. No. AP-T132/09. Sydney: Austroads Incorporated.

Main Roads Western Australia. 2007. Maximum Density of Asphalt: Rice Method. Document No. 71/04/732.2. Perth: Main Roads Western Australia.

Main Roads Western Australia. 2006. Bulk Density and Void Content of Asphalt. Document No. 71/09/733.1. Perth: Main Roads Western Australia.

ASTM. 2003. Theoritical Maximum Specific Gravity and Density of Bituminous Paving Mixtures. No. D2041-03a. Philadelphia: ASTM International.

ASTM. 2008. Bulk Specific Gravity and Density of Non-absorptive Compacted Bituminous Mixtures. No. D2726. Philadelphia: ASTM International.

Singh, D., F.N. Beainy, A.T Mai, S. Commuri, and M. Zaman. 2011. In-situ assessment of stiffness during the construction of HMA pavements. Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. 4(3): 131–139.

Pellinen, T. 2001. Investigation of the use of dynamic modulus as an indicator of hot-mix-asphalt performance. PhD Dissertation. Arizona State University.

Witczak, M.W., K. Kaloush, T. Pellinen, M. El-Basyouny and H. Von Quintus. 2002. Simple Performance Test for Superpave Mix Design. NCHRP Report 465. Transportation Research Board-National Research Council. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Harran, G. and A. Shalaby. 2009. Improving the prediction of the dynamic modulus of fine-graded asphalt concrete mixtures at high temperatures. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 36: 180–190.

Apeagyei, A.K., B.K. Diefenderfer, and S.D. Diefenderfer. 2011. Development of dynamic modulus master curves for hot-mix asphalt with abbreviated testing temperatures. International Journal of Pavement Engineering. 13(2): 98–109.

Tran, N.H. and K.D. Hall. 2006. Evaluation of testing protocols for dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1970: 126–132.

Bennert, T., and S.G. Williams. 2009. Precision of AASHTO TP62-07 for use in Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide for flexible pavements. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2127: 115–126.

Cho, Y-H, D-W Park, and S-D Hwang. 2010. A predictive equation for dynamic modulus of asphalt mixtures used in Korea. Construction and Building Materials. 24: 513–519.

Downloads

Published

2014-12-07

How to Cite

Dynamic Modulus of Western Australia Asphalt Wearing Course. (2014). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 71(3). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v71.3759