The Effective Factors on User Acceptance in Mobile Business Intelligence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v72.3913Keywords:
Mobile business intelligence, user acceptance, information quality, system quality, organization climate, individual effect and social effectAbstract
Mobile business intelligence used for business intelligence mobile service applications increasingly. According to Gartner (2011), global smartphone sales had arrived at 630 million in 2012, and are supposed to reach 1,105 million items in 2015. As a result, business intelligence users not only rely on desktop computers, while they as well want mobile access to joint and used data. Nevertheless, few studies have been consummate on mobile business intelligence services and the user acceptance rate of mobile BI is still moderately low. For these reasons, the current article centred on the significant of the factors and levels of mobile business intelligence user acceptance that affect the mobile business intelligence user Acceptance. The conceptual model planned and data collected between mobile business intelligence users and quantitative method used. The collected data, analysed by SPSS software. The result of data analysis exposed that how factors such as organization climate, information quality, system quality, society effect and individual effect were influenced user acceptance in mobile business intelligence applications.
Â
References
Chen, C.-Y., Shih, B.-Y., and Yu, S.-H. (2012). Disaster Prevention and Reduction for Exploring Teachers’ Technology Acceptance Using a Virtual Reality System and Partial Least Squares Techniques. Natural Hazards. 62(3): 1217–1231.
Turban, E., Sharda, R., and Delen, D. 2011. Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems. Pearson Education. Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Tyrväinen, T. 2013. Business Intelligence Trends in Finland in 2013. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 83(1): 33–60.
Brodzinski, J., Crable, E., Ariyachandra, T., and Frolick, M. (2013). Mobile Business Intelligence. International Journal of Business Intelligence Research (IJBIR). 4(2): 54–66.
Dresner, H. (2011). Mobile Business Intelligence Market Study.
Raduan, C., Jegak, U., Haslinda, A., and Alimin, I. 2009. Management, Strategic Management Theories and the Linkage with Organizational Competitive Advantage from the Resource-based View. European Journal of Social Sciences. 11(3): 402–418.
Farrokhi, V., and Pokoradi, L. (2012). The Necessities for Building a Model to Evaluate Business Intelligence Projects-Literature Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.1643.
Ghazanfari, M., Jafari, M., and Rouhani, S. (2011). A Tool to Evaluate the Business Intelligence of Enterprise Systems. Scientia Iranica. 18(6): 1579–1590.
Luftman, J., Zadeh, H. S., Derksen, B., Santana, M., Rigoni, E. H., and Huang, Z. D. 2012. Key Information Technology and Management Issues 2011–2012: An International Study. Journal of Information technology. 27(3): 198–212.
Evelson, B. 2011. Trends 2011 and Beyond: Business Intelligence. Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA. 31.
Shah, G. U. D., Bhatti, M. N., Iftikhar, M., Qureshi, M. I., & Zaman, K. 2013. Implementation of Technology Acceptance Model in E-Learning Environment in Rural and Urban areas of Pakistan. World Applied Sciences Journal. 27(11): 1495–1507..
Milolidakis, G., Akoumianakis, D., and Kimble, C. (2014). Digital Traces for Business Intelligence: A Case Study of Mobile Telecoms Service Brands in Greece. Journal of Enterprise Information Management. 27(1): 66–98.
Wixom, B. H., Watson, H. J., and Werner, T. 2011. Developing an Enterprise Business Intelligence Capability: The Norfolk Southern Journey. MIS Quarterly Executive. 10(2).
Yoon, T. E., Ghosh, B., and Jeong, B.-K. 2014. User Acceptance of Business Intelligence (BI) Application: Technology, Individual Difference, Social Influence, and Situational Constraints. System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on. 3758–3766.
Bargshady, G., Alipanah, F., Abdulrazzaq, A. W., and Chukwunonso, F. (2014). Business Inteligence Technology Implimentation Readiness Factors. Jurnal Teknologi. 68(3).
Hagerty, J., Sallam, R. L., and Richardson, J. 2012. Magic quadrant for business intelligence platforms. Gartner for Business Leaders (February 6, 2012).
Airinei, D., and Homocianu, D. (2010). The Mobile Business Intelligence Challenge. Economy Informatics. 10(1): 5–12.
Song, J., Kim, J., Jones, D. R., Baker, J., and Chin, W. W. 2014. Application Discoverability and User Satisfaction in Mobile Application Stores: An Environmental Psychology Perspective. Decision Support Systems. 59: 37–51.
Zahraee, S. M., Hatami, M., Rohani, J., Mihanzadeh, H., and Haghighi, M. 2014. Comparison of Different Scenarios Using Computer Simulation to Improve the Manufacturing System Productivity: Case Study. Advanced Materials Research. 845: 770–774.
Zahraee, S. M., Hashemi, A., Abdi, A. A., Shahpanah, A., and Rohani, J. M. 2014. Lean Manufacturing Implementation Through Value Stream Mapping: A Case Study. Jurnal Teknologi. 68(3).
Delone, W. H. 2003. The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems. 19(4): 9–30.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., and Ackerman, P. L. (2000). A Longitudinal Field Investigation of Gender Differences in Individual Technology Adoption Decision-making Processes.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.
