ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIALIZED BUILDING SYSTEM AND CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM USING BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING

Authors

  • Amir Faghirinejadfard Department of Structure and Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Tekknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor, Malaysia
  • Amir Mahdiyar PhD student, Department of Structure and Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Tekknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abdul Kadir Marsono Associate Professor, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor Darul Ta’zim, Malaysia
  • Saeed Reza Mohandes Department of Structure and Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Tekknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hossein Omrany Department of Structure and Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Tekknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor, Malaysia
  • Sanaz Tabatabaee PhD student, Department of Structure and Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Tekknologi Malaysia, 81310, Johor, Malaysia
  • Masine Md Tap Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Malaysia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4056

Keywords:

Industrial building system, building information modeling, Cost estimation

Abstract

The new construction method known as Industrialized Building System (IBS) offers several benefits compared to the Conventional Building System (CBS); however, IBS is perceived by most of the practitioners to be an expensive method for being utilized in construction industry. Whilst relatively numerous studies have been carried out on the subject of IBS and CBS methods, there has not been any exploiting building information modeling (BIM) as a useful tool to calculate quantities, time, and cost needed to construct building with each of the two aforementioned methods. The aim of this paper is to calculate cost of two similar buildings (one is constructed with IBS method and other one with CBS method) and compare them in terms of economy based on a chosen case study and same initial investment. To this end, the construction cost of buildings is calculated using BIM software, namely Revit Architecture and Navisworks Manage for modeling the chosen case study and estimating construction cost, respectively. The findings indicated that IBS was not economic in low investment of company; however, with investment on more than 100 units of IBS, this method was shown more economical compared to CBS method. In addition, the initial investment on IBS method could be returned when more than 200 units of IBS were implemented in the projects.

References

Mahdiyar, A., Abdullah, A., Tabatabaee, S., Mahdiyar, L., & Mohandes, S. R. 2015. Investigating the Environmental Impacts of Green Roof Installation. Jurnal Teknologi. 76(1).

Shamsuddin, S. M., Zakaria, R., Mohamed, S. F. 2013. Economic Attributes in Industrialised Building System in Malaysia. Procedia-SocBehav Sci. 105: 75-84. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.009.

Yunus, R., Yang, J. 2011. Sustainability Criteria for Industrialised Building Systems (IBS) in Malaysia. Procedia Eng. 14: 1590-1598. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.200.

W. A. Thanoon, Lee Wah Peng, MohdRazali Abdul Kadir MSJ and, Salit MS. 2003. The Experiences of Malaysia and Other Countries in Industrialised Building System. 10-11.

Bari, N. A. A., Yusuff, R., Ismail, N., Jaapar, A., Ahmad, R. 2012. Factors Influencing the Construction Cost of Industrialised Building System (IBS) Projects. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 35: 689-696. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.138.

Bari, N. A. A, Abdullah, N. A., Yusuff, R., Ismail. N., Jaapar, A. 2012. Environmental Awareness and Benefits of Industrialized Building Systems (IBS). Procedia-SocBehav Sci. 50(July): 392-404. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.044.

Ismail, F., Yusuwan, N. M., Baharuddin, H. E. A. Management Factors for Successful IBS Projects Implementation. 2012. Procedia-SocBehav Sci. 68: 99-107. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.210.

Jabar, I. L., Ismail, F., Mustafa, A. A. 2013. Issues in Managing Construction Phase of IBS Projects. Procedia-SocBehav Sci. 101: 81-89. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.181.

Shen, L., Hao, J. L., Tam, V., Yao, H. 2007. A Checklist for Assessing Sustainability Performance of Construction Projects. J Civ Eng. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13923730.2007.9636447. Accessed December 21, 2014.

Yee, A. 2001. Social and Environmental Benefits of Precast Concrete Technology. PCI J. http://www.precastdesign.com/media/publications/PCI_SE_Paper.pdf. Accessed December 21, 2014.

Haron, N. A., Hassim, S., Kadir, M. R. A., & Jaafa, M. S. 2012. Building Cost Comparison Between Conventional and Formwork System. Jurnal Teknologi. 43(1): 1-11.

Lachimpadi, S. K., Pereira, J. J., Taha, M. R., Mokhtar, M. 2012. Construction Waste Minimization Comparing Conventional and Precast Construction (Mixed System and IBS) Methods in High-Rise Buildings: A Malaysia Case Study. Resources Conservation and Recycling. 68: 96-103. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.08.011.

Lu W, Fung A, Peng Y, Liang C, Rowlinson S. 2014. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Building Information Modeling Implementation in Building Projects through Demystification of Time-Effort Distribution Curves. Build Environ. 82: 317-327. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.08.030.

Mohandes, S. R., Marsono, A. K., Omrany, H., Faghirinejadfard, A., & Mahdiyar, A. 2015. Comparison of Building Existing Partitions through Building Information Modeling (BIM). Jurnal Teknologi. 75(1).

Azhar, S., Nadeem, A. Building Information Modeling (BIM): 2008. A New Paradigm for Visual Interactive Modeling and Simulation for Construction Projects. Constr. http://www.neduet.edu.pk/Civil/ICCIDC.

Begum, R. A., Siwar, C., Pereira, J. J., & Jaafar, A. H. 2006. A Benefit–cost Analysis on the Economic Feasibility of Construction Waste Minimisation: The Case of Malaysia. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 48(1): 86-98. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344906000139. Accessed December 21, 2014.

Fleming, G. 2009. How has Retention been Affected by Changes to the Construction Act.

Jaillon, L., Poon, C. 2008. Sustainable Construction Aspects of Using Prefabrication in Dense Urban Environment: A Hong Kong Case Study. ConstrManag Econ. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01446190802259043. Accessed December 21, 2014.

Monteiro, A., Poças Martins, J. 2013. A survey on Modeling Guidelines for Quantity Takeoff-Oriented BIM-based Design. Autom Constr. 35: 238-253. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2013.05.005.

Son, H., Lee, S., Kim, C. 2015. What Drives the Adoption of Building Information Modeling in Design Organizations? An Empirical Investigation of the Antecedents Affecting Architects’ Behavioral Intentions. Autom Constr. 49: 92-99. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.012.

Cao, D., Wang, G., Li, H., Skitmore, M., Huang, T., Zhang, W. 2015. Practices and Effectiveness of Building Information Modelling in Construction Projects in China. Autom Constr. 49: 113-122. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2014.10.014.

Antón, L. Ã., Díaz, J. 2014. Integration of Life Cycle Assessment in a BIM Environment. Procedia Eng. 85: 26-32. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.525.

Hu, Z., Zhang, J. 2011. BIM- and 4D-based Integrated Solution of Analysis and Management for Conflicts and Structural Safety Problems during Construction: 2. Development And Site Trials. Autom Constr. 20(2): 167-180. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.014.

Zhang, J. P., Hu, Z. Z. 2011. BIM- and 4D-based Integrated Solution of Analysis and Management for Conflicts and Structural Safety Problems during Construction: 1. Principles and Methodologies. Autom Constr. 20(2): 155-166. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.09.013.

Smith, P. 2014. BIM & the 5D Project Cost Manager. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci. 119: 475-484. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.053.

Azman, M. N. A., Ahamad, M. S. S., &Hilmi, N. D. 2012. The Perspective View Of Malaysian Industrialized Building System (IBS) Under Ibs Precast Manufacturing. http://www.winlandresources.com/IBS_System.pdf.

Saha, S., Greville, C. J., Mullins, T. A. 2002. Optimisation of Construction Process Inspection Rates Using a Learning Approach. 1-13.

Downloads

Published

2015-12-22

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF INDUSTRIALIZED BUILDING SYSTEM AND CONVENTIONAL CONSTRUCTION SYSTEM USING BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.4056