Pedestrian’s Behaviour on Road Crossing Facilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4292Keywords:
Walking, pedestrian, risk, safety, jaywalking.Abstract
Walking is a major mode of transportation in developing countries where most road users are pedestrians who spend significant time on roads and using the road system. Walking almost inevitably involves crossing a road, where the chances of conflict between pedestrian and motor vehicle is much higher. In Dhaka, the capital of a developing country Bangladesh, pedestrians increase their accident risk when they decide to cross the road way without using the road crossing facilities. When a relatively unsafe choice is made, the pedestrian increases his accident risk and faces casualties. However, in Dhaka, it was not explored in the past about what percentage of people cross the road by pedestrian foot over bridge/ underpass or by jaywalking. Therefore, It is found that 40.2% of the pedestrians do not use road crossing facilities and 71% pedestrians prefer underpass rather than using foot over bridge. The reasons pedestrians are not using road crossing facilities are insufficient security, time consuming, poor entrance, hawker’s problem, discomfort, takes a long walk etc. To improve this situation several steps should be taken, such as: Enhance lighting facilities, prohibit commercial activities, adequate usage of roadside and median barrier, construct more underpass rather than foot over bridge etc.
References
Chen, L., C. Chen, and R. Ewing. 2014. The relative effectiveness of signal related pedestrian countermeasures at urban intersections—Lessons from a New York City case study. Transport Policy. 32: 69–78.
World Health Organization. 2010. World Health Organization (WHO) Report.
Bangladesh bureau of statistics. 2011. Bangladesh Population & Housing Census.
Hoque, M., and J. Alam. 2002. Report on Urban Transport Issues and Improvement Options in Bangladesh.
Barkat, A., W. Karim, A.H. Sarker, S. Hoque, and A. Poddar. 2004. After Study On The Impact Of Mirpur Demonstration Corridor Project: HDRC (Gabtoli-Russel Square) Prepared For Dhaka Transport Coordination board on September.
Bangladesh Road Transport Authority. 2008. RTA Annual Report 2008.
Hashib, A. A., M. S. Zaman, M. I. Arin, S. M. Rifaat and M. Al-Amin. 2012. A study on the students’ perception of pedestrian risk. ICETCESD 2012. 513–516.
Hoque, M. M. 2004. The Road to Road Safety: Issues and Initiatives in Bangladesh. Regional Health Forum. 8(1): 39–51.
Mfianga, D. A.,Implications of pedestrians stated preference of certain attributes ofcrosswalks. Transport Policy. 32:156–164.
Gudmundur, F., Ulfarsson, S. Kim, and K. M. Booth. 2010. Analyzing fault in pedestrian–motor vehicle crashes in North Carolina. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 42(6): 1805–1813.
Hamed, M. M. 2010. Analysis of Pedestrians’ Behavior at Pedestrian Crossings. Safety Science. 38: 63–82.
Tiwari, G., S. Bangdiwala, A. Saraswat, and S. Gaurav. 2007. Survival Analysis: Pedestrian risk Exposure at Signalized Intersections. Transport Research Part F. 10: 77–89.
Al-Madani, H., and A. Al-Janahi. 2006. Personal exposure risk factors in pedestrian accidents in Bahrain. Safety Science, 44: 335–347.
Gitelman, V., D. Balasha, R. Carmel, L. Hendel, and F. Pesahov. 2012. Characterization of pedestrian accidents and an examination of infrastructure measures to improve pedestrian safety in Israel. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 44(1): 63–73
Kim, K., I. M. Brunner, E. Yamashita. 2008. Modeling fault among accident—Involved pedestrians and motorists in Hawaii. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 40(6): 2043–2049.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright of articles that appear in Jurnal Teknologi belongs exclusively to Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (Penerbit UTM Press). This copyright covers the rights to reproduce the article, including reprints, electronic reproductions, or any other reproductions of similar nature.