Evaluation Criteria of Safety and Health Induction for Construction Worker (SICW) in Malaysia

Authors

  • Alfred Goh Pui Teck Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mat Naim Abdullah @ Mohd Asmoni Centre of Real Estate Study, Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hamdi Abdul Hamid Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Saidin Misnan Department of Quantity Surveying, Faculty of Built Environment, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Janice YM Lee Centre of Real Estate Study, Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mohd Nadzri Jaafar Centre of Real Estate Study, Department of Real Estate, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4325

Keywords:

Safety training, Safety and Health Induction for Construction Worker (SICW), safety knowledge, safety awareness, evaluation

Abstract

Workplace safety is one the main concern by facilities managers due to high fatality rates in Malaysia construction industry. Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) training is an important effort to reduce workplace accident and improve employees’ safety and health in construction industry by enhancing the workers’ safety knowledge and awareness on workplace. In Malaysia, Safety and Health Induction for Construction Worker (SICW) or commonly known as Green Card Training, a mandatory safety training, has been introduced by Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) to the construction related workers in order to enhance the workers’ safety knowledge and awareness on workplace. However, SICW has never been evaluated in term of its effectiveness in delivering safety knowledge and awareness to the workers since it has been introduced. Therefore, an evaluation is needed to be carried out to evaluate the safety knowledge and awareness gain by the workers from SICW. This paper will show the evaluation criteria for SICW based on the topics covered by standardized materials provided by CIDB. The evaluation criteria will serve as a guideline for evaluation of SICW in future research.

References

Best, R., De Valence, G., & Langton, C. 2007. Workplace Strategies and Facilities Management. Routledge.

Pitt, M., & Tucker, M. 2008. Performance Measurement in Facilities Management: Driving Innovation? Property Management. 26: 241–254.

Nutt, B. 2000. Four Competing Futures for Facilities Management. Facilities. 18: 124–132.

Tay, L., & Ooi, J. T. L. 2001. Facilities Management: 'a Jack of all Trades?' Facilities. 19: 357–362.

Brunette, M. J. 2004. Construction Safety Research in the United States: Targeting the Hispanic Workforce. Injury Prevention. 10(4): 244–8.

Abudayyeh, O., Fredericks, T. K., Butt, S. E., & Shaar, A. 2006. An Investigation of Management’s Commitment to Construction Safety. International Journal of Project Management. 24(2): 167–174.

Mohamed, S. 1999. Empirical Investigation of Construction Safety Management Activities and Performance in Australia. Safety Science. 33(3): 129–142.

International Labour Organization. 2003. Safety in Numbers. Pointers for a Global Safety Culture at Work. Geneva.

Department of Occupational Safety and Health. Retrieved 5 March 2014 from http://www.dosh.gov.my/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=795:occupational-accidents-statistics-2012&catid=458&Itemid=695&lang=en.

Accident Prevention Seminar. 2013. Return on Prevention: Occupational Safety and Health Promotion. Social Security Organisation of Malaysia.

Sawacha, E., Naoum, S., & Fong, D. 1999. Factors Affecting Safety Performance on Construction Sites. International Journal of Project Management. 17(5): 309–315.

Hughes, G., & Kornowa-weichel, M. 2004. Whose Fault is it Anyway? A Practical Illustration of Human Factors in Process Safety. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 115: 127–132.

Kawka, N., & Kirchsteiger, C. 1999. Technical Note on the Contribution of Sociotechnical Factors to Accidents Notified to MARS. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 12: 53–57.

Jannadi, O. A., & Bu-Khamsin, M. S. 2002. Safety Factors Considered by Industrial Contractors in Saudi Arabia. Building and Environment. 37(5): 539–547.

Sonnemans, P. J. M., & Korvers, P. M. W. 2006. Accidents in the Chemical Industry: Are They Foreseeable? Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries. 19: 1–12.

Sacks, R., Perlman, A., & Barak, R. 2013. Construction Management and Economics Construction Safety Training Using Immersive Virtual Reality. Construction Management and Economics. 37–41.

Musonda, I., & Smallwood, J. 2008. Health and Safety (H&S) Awareness and Implementation in Botswana’s Construction Industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology. 6(1): 81–90.

Bakri, A., Mohd Zin, R., Misnan, M. S., & Mohammed, A. H. 2006. Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Management Systems: Towards Development of Safety and Health Culture. In: 6th Asia-Pacific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference. 5-6th September. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Gillings, S. C., & Kleiner, B. H. 1993. New Development in Health and Safety Programmes. Work Study. 42(5): 9–12.

Waehrer, G. M., & Miller, T. R. 2009. Does Safety Training Reduce Work Injury in the United States? The ergonomics Open Journal. 2: 26–39.

Ho, C.-L., & Dzeng, R.-J. 2010. Construction Safety Training via e-Learning: Learning Effectiveness and User Satisfaction. Computers & Education. 55(2): 858–867.

Korman, R. 1997. Training Goals Divide Industry. Engineering News Record. 238(23): 8–9.

The Business Roundtable. June 24, 1996. Open-shop Training Backed by Business Rountable. Engineering News Record. 236(25): 7.

Oberman, G. 1996. An Approach for Measuring Safety Training Effectiveness. Occupational Health & Safety, Dec. 48–49.

Cooper, M. 1998. Health and Safety Training. Second ed. London: Financial Times Management Briefing.

Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. 1993. Application of Cognitive, Skill-based, and Affective Theories of Learning Outcomes to New Methods of Training Evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology. 78(2): 311.

Kirkpatrick, D. L. 1998. Evaluating Training Programs The Four Levels. 2nd ed. San Francisco: Berret Koehler.

Saks, A. M., & Burke, L. A. 2012. An Investigation Into the Relationship Between Training Evaluation and the Transfer of Training, International Journal of Training and Development. 16: 118–27.

Topno, H. 2012. Evaluation of Training and Development: An Analysis of Various Models. IOSR Journal of Business and Management. 5(2): 16–22.

Warr, P. B., Bird, M., and Rackham, N. 1970. The Evaluation of Management Training. Gower.

Kaufman, R., Keller, J., and Watkins, R. 1996. What Works and What Doesn't: Evaluation Beyond Kirkpatrick. Performance Instruction. 35(2): 8–12.

Downloads

Published

2015-03-31

How to Cite

Evaluation Criteria of Safety and Health Induction for Construction Worker (SICW) in Malaysia. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 73(5). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v73.4325