ARTIFICIAL BARRIER FOR RIVERBANK FILTRATION AS IMPROVEMENT OF SOIL PERMEABILITY AND WATER QUALITY

Authors

  • Nur Aziemah Abd Rashid School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Hafidz Roslan School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
  • Nurulezzah Abd Rahim School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
  • Ismail Abustan School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia
  • Mohd Nordin Adlan School of Civil Engineering, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 14300 Nibong Tebal, Penang, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4860

Keywords:

Riverbank filtration, physical model, granular activated carbon, zeolite, permeability

Abstract

Soil strata abilities to drain water at high volume is the essential properties in RBF (Riverbank Filtration). An artificial barrier (AB) is a man-made vertical barrier to pre-treat water abstraction intake. It is a mixture of sand (local soil), granular activated carbon (GAC) and zeolite. In this work, AB was made to enhance the flow of groundwater as well as water quality. The soil analysis of borehole near Kerian River featured clay, sandy clay loam and sandy loam. In the study, a local soil was mixed Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) at 9:1 (10% GAC), 7:3 and 1:1 ratios. The immediate results are the permeability increased with the percentage of GAC. Further, similar tests were conducted with a mixture of local soil, GAC and zeolite in ratio of 5:2:3 in a laboratory scale physical model. The removal of turbidity and iron in a local soil (without GAC and zeolite) in the range of 59% - 88% and 74% - 87%, respectively. However, a better removal capacity of turbidity and iron were found in the mixture of local soil, GAC and zeolite up to 76% - 98.8% and 73% -92% removals respectively. In sum, the initial study indicate that the mixture of local soil, GAC and zeolite with a specific ratio could provide a pre-treatment of turbidity and iron removal in RBF abstraction. 

References

Ismail, Y. 2013, 13 May. Air Bawah Tanah Penyelesaian Tangani Krisis, Sumberselamat Duguna, Bebas Pencemaran. Berita Harian. p.rencana 6.

Jurgen, S. 2003. Water Quality Improvement with Riverbank Filtration at Dusseldorf Waterworks in Germany. Water Science and Technology Library. 43: 267-277.

Jeong–Hwan, L., Se-Yeong, H., Jae-Yeol, C., Hyoung-Soo, K., Eun-Joung, K., Kwang-Sik, L., & Sang-Il, L. 2009. Characterizing Riverbank-filtered Water and River Water Qualities at a Site in the Lower Nakdong River Basin, Republic of Korea. Journal of Hydrology. 376(1-2): 209-220.

Ray, C. & Shamrukh, M. 2011. Riverbank Filtration for Water Security in Desert Countries. DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-0026-0_16, Springer Science, Business Media B.V.

Gupta, P., Pandey, G., Gore,M., Srivastava, D. K., & Misra, B. R. 2014. Study on the Presence of Faecal Coliform (E.Coli) in Groundwater Samples of Gorakhpur City, India. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences. 3(1): 9-12.

Thomas, H. 2002. Occurrence, Fate, and Removal of Pharmaceutical Residue in the Aquatic Environment: A Review of Recent Research Data. Journal of Toxicology letters. 131: 1-17.

Gorski, J. 2011. Chapter 16: Quality of Riverbank Filtrated Water on the Base of Poznan Cuty (Poland) Waterworks Experience.

Sontheimer, H. 1991. Drinking water from the Rhine? Academia Verlag, Sankt Augustin.

Chitaranjan, D. & Ramakar, J. 2014. Review on Water Treatment Technique Used for Riverbank Filtration. International Journal of Civil Engineering Research. 5(3): 221-226.

Zainal, A. A., Shaymaa, M., Arifah, B., & Saim, S. 2014. Review of the Role of Analytical Modelling Methods In Riverbank Filtration System. Jurnal Teknologi. 71(1): 59-69.

Pandolfo, A. G., & Hollenkamp, A. F. 2006. Carbon Properties and Their Role in Supercapacitor. Journal of Power Sources. 157: 11-27.

Perot, G. & Guisnet, M. 1990. Advantages and Disadvantages of Zeolite as Catalysts in Organic Chemistry. Journal of Molecular Catalyst. 61(2): 173-196.

[13] Zulkarnain, H. & Sobri, H. 2013. Impact of Climate Change on Rainfall Over Kerian, Malaysia with Long Ashton Research Station Weather Generator (LARS-WG). Malaysia Journal of Civil Engineering. 25(1): 33-44.

Salman, T. S., Somaye, A., & Mohammad, G. 2014. The Evaluation of Changes in Permeability and Chemical Composition of Gypseous Soil Through Leaching In Southern Mashhad, Iran. Malaysia Journal of Civil Engineering. 26(3): 337-348.

Clapp, R. B., & Hornberger, G. M. 1978. Empirical Equation for Some Soilhydraulic Properties. Journal of Water Resources Research. 14: 601-604.

Abel, C. D. 2009. Impact of Biodegradadability of Natural Organic Matter and Redox Conditions on Removal of Pharmaceutically Active Compounds During Riverbank Filtration. MSc thesis, UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education.

American Water Work Association, and American Society of Civil Engineers. 2005. Water Treatment Plant design. Ed. Edward, E. B. Fourth ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Handbooks.

Han, I., Schlautman, M. A., & Batchelor, B. 2000. Removal of Hexavelent Chromium from Groundwater by Granular Activated Carbon. Journal of Water Environment Resources. 72: 29-39.

Roehl, K. E., Huttenloch, P., & Czurda, K. 2001. Permeable Sorption Barriers for In-Situ Remediation of Polluted Groundwater-Reactive Materials and Reaction Mechanisms. In: Sarsby, R.W. & Meggyes, T. (eds.), GREEN 3, 3rd International Symposium on Geotechnics Related to the European Environment, June 21-23, 2000, Berlin, Germany. Thomas Telford, London. 466-473.

Downloads

Published

2015-06-25

How to Cite

ARTIFICIAL BARRIER FOR RIVERBANK FILTRATION AS IMPROVEMENT OF SOIL PERMEABILITY AND WATER QUALITY. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 74(11). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4860