STRUCTURAL SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BLOCK SYSTEM FOR TWO STOREYS SAFE HOUSE

Authors

  • Chun-Chieh Yip Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Abdul Kadir Marsono Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.5098

Keywords:

Pushover test, concrete block system, safe house, hysteresis curves

Abstract

Severe earthquakes in year 2004 had caused a destructive tsunami and killed more than 170,000 people in Aceh Indonesia. The disaster raises the public awareness and demand in safe house. This paper presented the structural failure behaviour, strength and performance level of two-bays double storeys safe house structure with the scaled of 1:5. Cyclic pushover test was conducted with compliance to the standard guidelines from Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA 356) in year 2000. The structural behaviour and deformation patterns under repeated cyclic lateral loads were identified through experimental test. The structural stiffness capacity, performance level, seismic energy dissipation and spectral acceleration of the safe house model were obtained through calculations from the hysteresis curves. Experimental result shows the ultimate lateral load of safe house model was 9.9 kN with roof top displacement of 49.1 mm. The model has performance level of Immediate Occupancy (IO), Life Safety (LS) and Collapse Prevention (CP) at 6.3 mm, 16 mm and 49.1 mm roof top displacement, respectively. It was found that, the safe house structure is able to withstand seismic excitation of 0.98 g spectral acceleration.

References

Guha-Sapir, D., Hoyois, Ph. and Below. R. 2012. Annual Disaster Statistical Review 2012 – The Numbers and Trends. Report of Epidemiology of Disasters, Institute of Health and Society: 1-50.

National Earthquake Information Center. 2012. M8.6 & M8.2 Northern Sumatra Indonesia Earthquakes of 11 April 2012. [Earthquake Summary Map]. Global Seismographic Network: Department of the Interior & Geological Survey, United State.

Jacques, B. M. 2008. Seismic Engineering. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.

Sinchuan Earthquake Death Toll Exceeds 21500 & 14000 Others Remain Buried. (2008, 16th May). Chinaviewnews, Retrieved December 26, 2011, from http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2008-05/16/content_8187277.htm.

Balendra, T. and Li, Z. 2008. Seismic Hazard of Singapore and Malaysia. EJSE. Special Issue: Earthquake engineering in the low and moderate seismic regions of Southeast Asia and Australia. 57-63.

Nasim, U. and Uday, V. 2005. Ballistic Testing of Polymer Composites to Manufacture Emergency Safe House Shelters. Journal of Composites for Construction. 9(4): 369-375.

Nur, Y., Tanya, T. and Danny, K. 2005. Hurricane Wind Shelter Retrofit Room Guidelines for Existing Houses. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction. 10(4): 246-252. ASCE–American Society of Civil Engineers.

Lu, G. Y., Zhang, G. Q. and Han, Z. J. 2010. Design and Optimization of an Emergency Shelter. Journal of Applied Mechanics and biomechanics, 978-1-4244-7739-5/10/2010, 1-4. IEEE–Institute of Applied Mechanics and Biomechanics.

Brandford, N. M. and Sen, R. 2005. Multi Parameter Assessment Guide for Emergency Shelter: Disaster Relief Applications. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities. 19(2).

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2014. FEMA 320 Taking Shelter from the Storm: Building a Safe Room for Your Home, Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security.

Andrew, B., Mohammed, Z., Long, Q. and Phelan, R. S. 2006. Validation of Finite Element Analyses for Storm Shelters. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 12(2).

Helmut, K. and Eduardo, M. 2004. Performance Based Earthquake Engineering. Earthquake Engineering from Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering. 9.1-9.5.

Majid, A., Romain, B. and Nawawi, C. 2013. Dynamic Response of Mortar-Free Interlocking Structures. Journal of Construction and Building Materials. 42: 168-189.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 1996. FEMA 273 NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building. Building Safety Seismic Council, Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2000. FEMA 356 Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Building. Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security.

Federal Emergency Management Agency. 2005. FEMA 440 Improvements of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures. Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security.

Matthew, J. S. 2000. Reliability-Based Seismic Performance Evaluation of Steel Frame Buildings using Nonlinear Static Analysis Methods. Journal of Construction and Building Materials, University Of California, Los Angeles.

USGS. 2013. Historic World Earthquakes, United State National Earthquake Information Center. Retrieved December, 2013, from http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/world/historical.php/.

British Standard Institution. 1992. European code 3: Design of Steel Structure. London: British Standards Institution.

British Standard Institution. 2000. B.S. 5950: Structural Use of Steelwork in Building. London: British Standards Institution.

British Standard Institution. 1996. B.S. 6399: Loading for Buildings. London: British Standards Institution.

Jones, T. 2003. Chapter 4: Earthquake Risks. Geosciences Australia, Canberra, Australia. 46-70.

Downloads

Published

2016-02-09

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

STRUCTURAL SEISMIC PERFORMANCE OF REINFORCED CONCRETE BLOCK SYSTEM FOR TWO STOREYS SAFE HOUSE. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.5098