SOLUTION SPACE DIAGRAM IN CONFLICT DETECTION SCENARIOS

Authors

  • Siti Mariam Abdul Rahman Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.
  • Clark Borst Control and Operation Division, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
  • Max Mulder Control and Operation Division, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.
  • Rene van Paassen Control and Operation Division, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5210

Keywords:

Air traffic control, sector complexity, solution space diagram

Abstract

This research investigates the use of Solution Space Diagram (SSD) as a measure of sector complexity and also as a predictor of performance and workload, focusing on the scenarios regarding Air Traffic Controller (ATCO)’s ability to detect future conflicts. A human-in-the-loop experiment with varying intercept angle within the same sector layout has been designed and conducted. A short duration and a single predetermined conflict for each scenario were programmed to ensure a controlled experiment environment. The main aim of this experiment is to investigate whether the SSD can predict the workload ratings and subject performance in a conflict detection task. Based on the results, no common pattern can be observed, which can directly associate workload ratings and SSD area properties for various intercept angles. As conflict presented in the experiment between the converging aircraft, it was found that smaller SSD observation angles correlate better with the workload rating. These results were anticipated, as in converging conditions aircraft ahead of the velocity vector will be captured as the main focus. The SSD also does not represent a trigger for conflict detection. There is no consistent SSD area percentage where ATCO would start detecting conflict. Thus, it is concluded that the SSD does not represent a trigger for conflict detection.  

References

Remington, R. W., Johnston, J. C., Ruthruff, E., Gold, M., and Romera, M. 2000. Visual Search in Complex Displays: Factors Affecting Conflict Detection by Air Traffic Controllers. Human Factors. 42(3): 349-366.

Rantanen, E. M., and Nunes, A. 2005. Hierarchical Conflict Detection in Air Traffic Control. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 15(4): 339-362.

Nunes, A., and Kirlik, A. 2005. An Empirical Study of Calibration in Air Traffic Control Expert Judgment. In Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting. 422-426.

Lee, K., Feron, E., and Pritchett, A. R. 2009. Describing Airspace Complexity: Airspace Response to Disturbances. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics. 32(1): 210-222.

Endsley, M. R., and Rodgers, M. D. 1998. Distribution of Attention, Situation Awareness, and Workload in a Passive Air Traffic Control Task: Implications of Operational Errors and Automation. Air Traffic Control. 6(1): 21-44.

S. M. B. Abdul Rahman, C. Borst, M. Mulder and M. M. van Paassen, 2012. Measuring Sector Complexity: Solution Space-based Method, Chapter 2 from Advances in Air Navigation Services, Edited by Prof. Tone Magister. August 2012. ISBN 978-953-51-0686-9.

Van Dam, S. B. J., Abeloos, A. L. M., Mulder, M., and van Paassen, M. M. 2004. Functional Presentation of Travel Opportunities in Flexible Use Airspace: an EID of an Airborne Conflict Support Tool. In IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernatics. Vol. 1: 802-808.

Mercado Velasco, G. A., Mulder, M., and van Paassen, M. M. 2010. Analysis of Air Traffic Controller Workload Reduction Based on the Solution Space for the Merging Task. In AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference. Toronto, CA. August 2010. 18.

Downloads

Published

2015-08-20

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

SOLUTION SPACE DIAGRAM IN CONFLICT DETECTION SCENARIOS. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi, 75(8). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5210