MATERIALS SELECTION FOR HIP PROSTHESIS BY THE METHOD OF WEIGHTED PROPERTIES

Authors

  • Ehsan Hamidi Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Alireza Fazeli Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Muhamad Azizi Mat Yajid Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Nor Azwadi Che Sidik Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5291

Keywords:

Materials selection, hip prosthesis, weighted properties method, biocompatible material, performance index, implant

Abstract

Process of materials selection for an artificial part, which is planted in vivo, has been always a vital procedure. Production and construction requirements for implants would involve a wide variety of considerations from mechanical specifications to medical limitations. From mechanical point of view, it is desired the implant exhibits mechanical properties of the missing bone as close as possible to reduce the risk of failure and provide a high level of comfort to the patient. The most bolded medical trait that prostheses must possess is the quality of biocompatible being; meaning that, they have to be accepted by the body’s living organisms. In this paper, five common biocompatible materials as candidates for hip prostheses production namely, 316L St Steel (cold worked, ASTM F138), Co–28Cr–6Mo (cast, ASTM F75), Ti–6Al–4V (hot forged, ASTM F620), Zirconia (ceramic, 3Y-TZP) and Alumina (ceramic, ZTA) are selected and evaluated by the method of weighted properties, in order to narrow down the search to find the candidate which best fit the real bone’s mechanical traits. For the analysis, six attributes were considered and weighted against each other namely, elastic modulus, yield strength, tensile strength, fatigue strength, corrosion rate and density. From the results, alumina and stainless steel show highest performance indexes but as it is discussed, due to the importance of biocompatibility required in practical, materials ranked on position 4th and 5th which are respectively of cobalt and titanium alloys–although are less mechanically similar to the real bone, are the most desirable choices in the industry. It will be concluded that in the process of materials selection for implants, 

References

K. Kato, H. Aoki, T. Tabata, M. Ogiso. 1979. Biocompatibility of apatite ceramics in mandibles. Artificial Cells, Blood Substitutes and Biotechnology. 7: 291-297.

D. E. Grenoble, J. L. Katz, K. L. Dunn, R. S. Gilmore, K. L. Murty. 1972. The elastic properties of hard tissues and apatites, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 6 : 221-233.

P. R. Bouchard, J. Black, B. A. Albrecht, R. E. Kaderly, J. O. Galante, B.U. Pauli. 1996. Carcinogenicity of CoCrMo (Fâ€75) implants in the rat. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 32: 37-44.

H. Ehrlich. 2010. Biomaterials and biological materials, common definitions, history, and classification, Biological Materials of Marine Origin. Springer. 3-22.

J. Park, R. S. Lakes. 2007. Biomaterials: an introduction. Springer

J. B. Park. 1984. Biomaterials science and engineering. Springer. 4

M. Murali, S. Yeo. 2004. Rapid biocompatible micro device fabrication by micro electro-discharge machining. Biomedical Microdevices 6: 41-45.

J. Black, G. Hastings. 1998. Handbook of biomaterial properties. Springer

D. F. Williams. 2008. On the mechanisms of biocompatibility. Biomaterial.s 29: 2941-2953.

N. J. Hallab, S. Anderson, T. Stafford, T. Glant, J. J. Jacobs.2005. Lymphocyte responses in patients with total hip arthroplasty. Journal Of Orthopaedic Research. 23: 384-391.

A. Sargeant, T. Goswami. 2007 Hip implants–paper VI–ion concentrations. Materials & Design.: 155-171.

M. Geetha, A. K. Singh, R. Asokamani, A. K. Gogia.2009. Ti based biomaterials, the ultimate choice for orthopaedic implants–A review. Progress in Materials Science 54: 397-425.

I. Gotman. 1997. Characteristics of metals used in implants. Journal of endourology 11: 383-389

Downloads

Published

2015-08-27

How to Cite

MATERIALS SELECTION FOR HIP PROSTHESIS BY THE METHOD OF WEIGHTED PROPERTIES. (2015). Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences & Engineering), 75(11). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v75.5291