VARIABILITY OF RICE YIELD WITH RESPECT TO CROP HEALTH

Authors

  • Renny Eka Putri Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, 43400 Sedang, Selangor D. E., Malaysia
  • Azmi Yahya Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, 43400 Sedang, Selangor D. E., Malaysia
  • Nor Maria Adam Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, 43400 Sedang, Selangor D. E., Malaysia
  • Samsuzana Abd Aziz Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty Engineering, University Putra Malaysia, 43400 Sedang, Selangor D. E., Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.7272

Keywords:

Rice Cultivation, Crop Yield Variability, Crop Health, SPAD Value

Abstract

Chlorophyll content of leaf can be used as an indicator of the crop health. The SPAD chlorophyll meter has been acceptably used for rapid analysis of chlorophyll content and nitrogen status of crops while it has not been established how strongly the SPAD values are correlated with rice yield within a plot. This study was to explore the relationship between rice yields and the leaf SPAD value of the associated rice plots. Twenty sampling points of rice leaves plant were taken at three difference growing stages based on grid point sampling of 30m x 18m for two crop seasons. Two methods, namely instantaneous yield from on-board yield monitoring system mounted on a combine harvester and estimated crop yield from cutting test (CCT) yield were used to measure the variability of harvested rice yield within the rice plot. The SPAD values were found positively correlated with grain yield at different growth stages.  The highest significant correlation was at crop age 70 days after planting with Pearson’s correlations (r) ranging 0.7280 to 0.8336 (P<0.001). Consequently, information with regards to SPAD value variability could triggers farmers in taking immediate in situ action for improving the crop yield while information with regards to crop yield variability could assist farmers in planning the proper farming practice for the subsequent cropping seasons. Generally, this available technology would assist farmers in improving their crop yield and their economic status.

References

Yanai, J., C. K. Lee, and K. Takashi. 2000. Spatial Variability of Chemical Properties in Apaddy Field. Soil Science Plant Nutrition. 46(2): 473-482.

Yanai, J., C. K. Lee and T. Kaho. 2001. Geostatistical Analysis of Soil Chemical Properties and Rice Yieldi a Paddy Field and Application to the Analysis of Yield-Determining Factors. Soil Science Plant Nutrition. 47(2): 291-301.

Yanai, J., C. K. Lee, M. Umeda and T. Kosaki. 2002. Spatial Variability Of Soil Properties And Rice Yield In Paddies: Is Precision Agriculture Worth Practicing? Proceedings of the 17th World Congress of Soil Science. Bangkok, Soil and Fertilizer Society of Thailand, Bangkok, Thailand.

Balasubramanian, V., Morales, A. C., Thiyagarajan, T. M., Babu, M., Hai, L. H. 2000. Adaptation of the Chlorophyll Meter (SPAD) Technology for Real- Time N Management in Rice: A Review. International Rice Research Note (IRRN).

Esfahani, H. R., A. Abbasi, B. Rabiei and Kavousi. 2008. Improvement of Nitrogen Management in Rice Paddy Fields Using Chlorophyll Meter (SPAD). Paddy Water Environ. 6: 181-188.

Hussain, F., Bronson, K.F., Singh, Y., Singh, B. Peng, S. 2000. Use Of Chlorophyll Meter Sufficiency Indicates For Nitrogen Management Of Irrigated Rice In Asia. Agron. J. 92: 875-879.

Mutters, R. G., Eckert, J. W., Williams, J., Fenn, G. and J., Cardosa. 2003. Development of a Leaf Color Chart for California Rice Varieties. UC Cooperative Extension. University of California.

Cen, H., Y. Shao, H. Song and Y. He. 2006. Non-destructive Estimation of Rape Nitrogen Status Using SPAD Chlorophyll Meter. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Signal Processing. Apr. 16-20, IEEE Xplore, Beijing.

Felix, C. W. L., J. C. Grabosky and N. L. Bassuk. 2002. Using The SPAD 502 Chlorophyll Meter To Assess Chlorophyll And Nitrogen Content Of Benjamin Fig And Cottonwood Leaves. Horttechnology. 12: 682-686.

Rostami, M., A. Koocheki, M.N. Mahallati and M. Kafi. 2008. Evaluation of Chlorophyll Meter (SPAD) Data for Prediction of Nitrogen Status in Corn (Zea mays L.). Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 3: 79-85.

Yang, W.H., S. Peng, J. Huang, A.L. Sanico, R.J. Buresh and C. Witt. 2003. Using Leaf Color Charts to Estimate Leaf Nitrogen Status of Rice. Agron. J. 95: 212-217.

Peterson, T. M. Blackmer, D. D. Francis, J. S. Scheppers. 1993. Using a Chlorophyll Meter to Improve N Management A Webguide In Soil Resource Management: D-13 Fertility. Cooperative Extension Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, USA.

Islam, M. R., Shamsul H., Nurunnaher A., and Abdul K. 2014. Leaf Chlorophyll Dynamics in Wheat Based On SPAD Meter Reading and Its Relationship with Grain Yield. Journal of Scientia Agriculture. 8(1): 13-18.

Cartelat, A., Z.G. Cerovic, Y. Goulas, S. Meyer and C. Lelarge et al. 2005. Optically Assessed Contents of Leaf Polyphenolics and Chlorophyll as Indicators of Nitrogen Deficiency in Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Field Crops Research. 91: 35-49.

Costa, C., D. Frigon, P. Dutilleul, L. M. Dwyer, V. D. Pillar, D. W. Stewart and D. L. Smith. 2003. Sample Size Determination for Chlorophyll Meter Reading On Maize Hybrids With A Broad Range Of Canopy Type. Journal of plant Nutrition. 1117-1130.

Varvel, G. E., W. W. Wilhelm, J. F. Shanahan and J. S. Schepers. 2007. An Algorithm For Corn Nitrogen Recommendations Using A Chlorophyll Meter Based Sufficiency Index. Agronomy Journal. 99: 701-706.

Gholizadeh, A., Amin, M. S. M., Anuar, A. R., and Aimrun, W. 2009. Evaluation of Spad Chlorophyll Meter in Two Different Rice Growth Stages and Its Temporal Variability. European Journal of Sceince Research. 37(4): 591-598.

Gholizadeh, A., Amin, M., Soom, M., Rahim, A. A., and Wayayok, A. 2011a. Using Soil Plant Analysis Development Chlorophyll Meter for Two Growth Stages to Assess Grain Yield of Malaysian Rice (Oryza sativa). 6(2): 209-213.

JICA. 2007. Officers Manual, Crop Cutting Yield Per Rei, Second Rice (Dry Season). Officer of Agricultural Economics, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. JICA ASEAD PROJECT

Huddleston. 1978. Sampling Techniques for Measuring and Forecasting. Economic, Statistics And Cooperative Service US. Department of Agriculture ESCS No 9.

Zhou, Q. F., Wang, J. H. 2003. Comparison of Upper Leaf and Lower Leaf of Rice Plants in Response to Supplemental Nitrogen Levels. Journal Plant Nutrition. 26: 607-617.

SAS Institute. 1996. SAS System for Window. Release 6.12. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

Best, W. B. and J. V. Kahn. 2003. Research in Education. New Delhi: Printice-Hall of India Pvt-Ltd.

Silveira, P. M., A. J. B. P. Braz and A. D. Didonet. 2003. Chlorophyll Meter to Evaluate the Necessity of Nitrogen in Dry Beans. Pesq. Agropec. Bras. Brasilia. 38: 1083-1087.

Peng, S., Khush, G. S., Virk, P., Tang, Q. Y., Zou, Y. B. 2008. Progress in Ideotype Breeding to Increase Rice Potential. Field Crop Res. 108: 32-38.

Turner, F. T., and Jund, M. F. 1991. Chlorophyll Meter to Predict Nitrogen Topdress Requirement for Semidwarf Rice. Agronomy Journal. 83(5): 926-928.

Nuarsa I.W., Kanno, S., Sugimori, Y. and Nishio, F. 2005. Spectral Characterization of Rice Field Using Multi-Temporal Landsat ETM+ Data. International Journal of Remote Sensing and Earth Sciences. 2: 65-71.

Swain, D. K., and Sandip, S. I. 2010. Rice Variety for Site-speciï¬c Nitrogen Management. Journal of Agronomy. 9(2): 38-44.

Huang, J. L., He, F., Cui, K. H., Buresh, R. J., Xu, B., Gong, W. H., Peng, S. B. 2008. Determination of Optimal Nitrogen Rate for Rice Varieties Using a Chlorophyll Meter. Field Crop Res. 105: 70-80.

Khurana, H. S., Phillips, S. B., Singh, B., Dobermann, A., Sidhu, A. S., Singh, Y., Peng, S. 2007. Performance of Site-Specific Nutrient Management for Irrigated, Transplanted Rice In Northwest India. Agron. J. 99: 1436-1447.

Dahal, H., and Routray, J. K. 2011. Identifying Associations between Soil And Production Variables Using Linear Multiple Regression Models. Journal of Agriculture and Environment. 12: 27-37.

Heege, H. J. 2013. Precision in Crop Farming. Site Specific Concept and Sensing Methods: Application and Results. Springer. New York.

Downloads

Published

2016-01-27

How to Cite

VARIABILITY OF RICE YIELD WITH RESPECT TO CROP HEALTH. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(1-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.7272