CLAMPING AND INTERLOCKING EFFECTS ON IBS BLOCK HOUSE SYSTEM IN COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL HOUSE SYSTEM

Authors

  • Lee Shu Chi Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • Abdul Kadir Marsono Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
  • Masine Md. Tap Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/.v78.8154

Keywords:

Clamping and interlocking effects, ibs block work, push over cyclic test

Abstract

Industrialised Building System (IBS) is a unique construction technique that has been implemented in many construction fields all around the world. However, its implementation in Malaysia is still slow and not effective. Through the research on IBS, some elements are found to be important and need to be improved in order to produce better quality components. One of the important elements is the design and innovation of IBS components by applying new interlocking configuration between blocks and by using a clamping bolted connection to the system. The main objective of this research is to determine the structural behavior of IBS block works sub-system under push over cyclic loading in comparison with conventional sub-system and to verify that the IBS interlocking geometry sub-system perform better than other sub-systems via laboratory tests. In this research, a block work assembly to form building sub-frame that integrated by two beams, two columns and infill system were built and tested to failure. Two types of IBS block work sub-systems with original geometry and interlocking geometry with scaled of 1:5 were tested with Push Over Cyclic Load Test. In comparison, a control model of Conventional Sub-System was also tested and analysed using the same methods. The results showed that the IBS geometry model with interlocking configuration performed better in terms of stiffness, ductility and flexibility of the models. The IBS original geometry model is ductile but lack structural stiffness while the conventional model is stiff but not ductile. 

Author Biographies

  • Lee Shu Chi, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
    PhD Student, Department of Structure & Materials, Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Technology Malaysia (UTM)
  • Abdul Kadir Marsono, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
    Assoc. Prof. Dr., Faculty of Civil Engineering, University of Technology Malaysia (UTM)
  • Masine Md. Tap, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor Malaysia
    Assoc. Prof. Dr., Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Technology Malaysia (UTM)

References

Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) Malaysia. 2003. IBS Survey. Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB).

Thanoon, W. A. M., Peng, L. W., Abdul Kadir, M. R., Jaafar, M. S. and Salit, M. S. 2003. The Experiences of Malaysia and Other Countries in Industrialised Building System in Malaysia. Proceeding on IBS Seminar. UPM, Malaysia.

Warszawski, A. 1999. Industrialized and Automated Building System. E & FN Spoon. Technion-Israel Institute of Technology.

Lessing, J., A. Ekholm and L. Stehn. 2005. Industrialized Housing – Definition and Categorization of the Concept. 13th International Group for Lean Construction. Australia, Sydney. July 2005. 474-480.

Construction Industry Development Board (CIDB) Malaysia. 2007. Construction Industry Master Plan (CIMP 2006-2015). Construction Industry Development Board Publication, Malaysia.

Hashim, M. S. 1998. The Industrialised Construction System - Pengalaman (The Experience of) PKNS Engineering & Construction Berhad (PECB). Colloquium on Industrialised Construction System. CIDB.

Mohamad, M. I., Zawawi, M. and Nekooie, M. A. 2009. Implementing Industrialised Building System (IBS) in Malaysia: Acceptance and Awareness Level, Problems and Strategies. Malaysian Journal of Civil Engineering. 21(2): 219-234. ISSN 1823-7843

Rahman, A. B. A., Omar, W. 2006. Issues and Challenges in the Implementation of IBS in Malaysia. Proceeding of the 6th Asia-Pasific Structural Engineering and Construction Conference ASPEC 2006. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 5-6 September 2006. 45-53.

Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K. 2002. A Modal Pushover Analysis Procedure for Estimating Seismic Demands for Buildings. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics. 31: 561-582.

Federal Emergency Management Agency Publication. 1997. FEMA 273. NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Building Safety Seismic Council, Washington, D.C.: Department of Homeland Security.

Hernandez-Montes, E., Kwon, O.-S., and Aschheim, M. A. 2004. An Energy-based Formulation for First and Multiple Mode Nonlinear Static (Pushover) Analyses. Journal Earthquake Engineering. 8(1): 69-88.

Yip, C. C., Marsono, A. K. 2016. Structural Seismic Performance of Reinforced Concrete Block System for Two Storeys Safe House. Jurnal Teknologi. 78(2): 83-97.

Paret, T. F., Sasaki, K. K., Eilbekc, D. H., and Freeman, S. A. 1996. Approximate Inelastic Procedures to Identify Failure Mechanisms from Higher Mode Effects. Proceeding 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Acapulco, Mexico. Paper No. 966.

Moghadam, A. S. and Tso, W. K. 2002. A Pushover Procedure for Tall Buildings. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Elsevier Science Ltd. Paper 395.

Baumgart, F. 2000. Stiffness – An Unknown World of Mechanical Science. Injury. 31: 14-23.

Vayas, I. 1999. Interaction between local and global ductility. Copernicus RECOS. Report Lab. National Technical University of Athens.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-31

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

CLAMPING AND INTERLOCKING EFFECTS ON IBS BLOCK HOUSE SYSTEM IN COMPARISON WITH CONVENTIONAL HOUSE SYSTEM. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(11). https://doi.org/10.11113/.v78.8154