MEASURING THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS FROM THE CONTAMINATED SOIL REMEDIATION POLICY IN KOREA: A CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDY

Authors

  • Seul-Ye Lim Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, 232 Gongreung-Ro, Nowon-Gu, Seoul, 01811, Republic of Korea
  • Seung-Hoon Yoo Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy & Environment, Seoul National University of Science & Technology, 232 Gongreung-Ro, Nowon-Gu, Seoul, 01811, Republic of Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8554

Keywords:

Contaminated soil, contingent valuation, economic benefit, willingness to pay

Abstract

Soil contamination caused by economic growth through industrialization and urbanization has been progressed inKorea. Soil polluted with heavy metals and chemicals makes significantly negative effects on human and wildlife health. This paper attempts to measure the economic benefits from the contaminated soil remediation policy using a specific case study ofKorea. To this end, the contingent valuation (CV) method is employed. A CV national survey of randomly selected 500 households was implemented using person-to-person interviewing in May 2105.  To elicit the willingness to pay (WTP), we apply one-and-one-half bound dichotomous choice question format to reduce the potential for response bias and spike model to deal with zero willingness to pay (WTP). The mean WTP for the policy is estimated to be KRW 1,357 (USD 1.2) for next ten years per household per year and statistically significant at the 1% level. Expanding the value to the national population gives us KRW 25.4 billion (USD 22.9 million) per year. We can judge that the Korean public places a significant value and be utilized in assessing the total benefits from the policy.

References

Pimentel K., Harvey C., Resosudarmo P., Sinclair K., Kurz D., McNair M, Crist S., Shpritz L., Fitton L., Saffouri R., and Blair R. 1995. Environmental And Economic Costs Of Soil Erosion And Conservation Benefits. Science. 267: 1117-1123.

van Wezel, A. P., Franken, R. O. G., Drissen, E., Versluijs, K. C. W., and Van den Berg, R. 2007. Societal Cost-Benefit Analysis For Soil Remediation In The Netherlands. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management. 4: 61-74.

Chen, W. Y. 2015. Public Willingness-To-Pay For Conserving Urban Heritage Trees In Guangzhou, South China. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 14: 796-805.

Gavrilescu, M. 2009. Energing Processes For Soil And Groundwater Clean-Potential Benefits And Risks. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal. 8: 1293-1307.

Brent, R. J. 2006. Applied Cost-Benefit Analysis. 2nd edition. Edward Elgar, New York, NY.

Hanemann, W. M. 1984. Welfare Evaluations In Contingent Valuation Experiments With Discrete Responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66: 332-41.

Hanemann, W. M., Loomis, J. B. and Kaninnen, B. J. 1991. Statistical Efficiency Of Double-Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 73: 1255-63.

Kriström, B. 1997. Spike Models In Contingent Valuation. American Journal Agricultural Economics. 79: 1013-23.

Song, T. -H, Lim,K. -M., Yoo, S. -H. 2015. Estimating The Public's Value Of Implementing The CO2 Emissions Trading Scheme In Korea. Energy Policy. 83: 82-86.

Krinsky, I., Robb, A. 1986. On Approximating The Statistical Properties Of Elasticities. Review of Economics and Statistics. 68: 715-719.

Downloads

Published

2016-05-09

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

MEASURING THE ECONOMIC BENEFITS FROM THE CONTAMINATED SOIL REMEDIATION POLICY IN KOREA: A CONTINGENT VALUATION STUDY. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(5-4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8554