EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF FLOW RATE’S EFFECT ON SURFACTANT-ALTERNATING-GAS FOAM PROCESS

Authors

  • Hamed Hematpur Research Institute of Petroleum Industry, Tehran, Iran
  • Syed Mohammad Mahmood Petroleum Department of Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Tronoh, Malaysia
  • Mongy Mohamad Amer Petroleum Department of Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Tronoh, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8975

Keywords:

Foam Flooding, Surfactant-Alternating–Gas (SAG), Mobility Reduction Factor, Adsorption

Abstract

The gas injection is one of the most common methods to increase oil recovery. However, there are several drawbacks in the application of this method due to density and viscosity differences between displaced and displacing fluids. In order to tackle these drawbacks, gas can be utilized as different forms of foam which one of these methods is called Surfactant-Alternating-Gas (SAG). Although many studies have been conducted on foam flow through porous media, the behavior of foam still is moot to some extent. Since, the elaboration of SAG foam behavior in porous media is the aim of this study. However many parameters affect SAG foam behavior, the injection flow rate plays a significant role in foam behavior. In this study, we investigated the flow rate’s effect on SAG behavior. To achieve this target, several cores flooding, in the absence of oil, were conducted and results were interpreted. The experimental design for this work included core flooding apparatus, IOS as surfactant and nitrogen as injected gas. The experiments were interpreted in term of liquid recovery and pressure drop. The results show that the SAG efficiency highly depends on gas flow rate which high injection flow rate, low SAG foam efficiency.

References

Schramm, L. L. 1994. Foams: Fundamentals and Applications in the Petroleum Industry. ACS Adv. Chem. Ser. No. 242.

D. C. Bond and C. C. Holbrook. 1958. Gas Drive Oil Recovery Process. Patent Number: 2,866,507.

Afsharpoor, G. S. Lee, and S. I. Kam. 2010. Mechanistic Simulation Of Continuous Gas Injection Period During Surfactant-Alternating-Gas (SAG) Processes Using Foam Catastrophe Theory. Chem. Eng. Sci. 65(11): 3615-3631.

Ashoori, E., van der Heijden, T., and Rossen, W. 2010. Fractional-Flow Theory of Foam Displacements With Oil. SPE J. 15: 20-22.

Le, V. Q., Nguyen, Q. P., Sanders, A. W., and Dow, T., 2008. A Novel Foam Concept with CO 2 Dissolved Surfactants. The SPE/DOE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium held in Tulsa, Oklahoma, 19-23 April. 1-15.

Stone, H. L. 2004. A Simultaneous Water and Gas Flood Design with Extraordinary Vertical Gas Sweep. Proceedings of SPE International Petroleum Conference in Mexico.

Rossen, W., van Duijn, C., Nguyen, Q., Shen, C., and Vikingstad, A. 2010. Injection Strategies To Overcome Gravity Segregation in Simultaneous Gas and Water Injection Into Homogeneous Reservoirs. SPE J.15.

Hirasaki, G. J. 1989. The Steam-Foam Process--Review of Steam-Foam Process Mechanisms. Soc. Pet. Eng. SPE–19518–MS.

H. Hematpur, M. Karimi, and M. Rashidi. 2014. A Brief Review On Foam Flow Modeling Through Porous Media. Int. J. Pet. Geosci. Eng. 104-119.

Rosman, A. and Kam, S. I. 2009. Modeling Foam-diversion Process Using Three-phase Fractional Flow Analysis in a Layered System. Energy Sources, Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 31(11): 936-955.

Rossen, W. R. and Boeije, C. S. 2015. Fitting Foam-Simulation-Model Parameters to Data : II . Surfactant-Alternating-Gas Foam Applications. SPE Reserv. Eval. Eng. 273-283.

2015. Seawater. Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, [Online].Available:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seawater#cite_note-1.

Fergui, O., Bertin, H., and Quintard, M., 1998. Transient Aqueous Foam Flow In Porous Media: Experiments And Modeling. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 20: 9-29.

Ma, K., Lopez-salinas, J. L., Puerto, M. C., Miller, C. a, Biswal, S. L., and Hirasaki, G. J. 2013. Estimation of Parameters for the Simulation of Foam Flow through Porous Media. Part 1 : The Dry-Out Effect. Energy Fuels. 27(5): 2363-2375.

Hematpour, H., Arabjamloei, R., Nematzadeh, M., Esmaili, H., and Mardi, M. 2012. An Experimental Investigation of Surfactant Flooding Efficiency in Low Viscosity Oil Using a Glass Micromodel. Energy Sources, Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 34(19): 1745-1758.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-12

How to Cite

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF FLOW RATE’S EFFECT ON SURFACTANT-ALTERNATING-GAS FOAM PROCESS. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6-4). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.8975