COMPARISON OF WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT PERFORMANCE FOR TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF DIAPHRAGM USING FIBER BRAGG GRATING BASED OPTICAL SENSORS

Authors

  • Odai Falah Ameen Laser Center, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Marwan Hafeedh Younus Laser Center, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • RK Raja Ibrahim Laser Center, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Rosly Abdul Rahman Laser Center, Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9203

Keywords:

Fiber Bragg grating, diaphragm, silicone rubber, liquid level, hydrostatic pressure

Abstract

A sensor head incorporating a diaphragm was designed and fabricated for water level measurement. It operates in the range of 0-70 cm column height, equivalent to a pressure in atmospheric pressure of 0-6.86 kPa. The fiber Bragg grating (FBG) was attached on the two types of diaphragm to detect the change in the hydrostatic pressure caused by water at different levels. The diaphragms performance by comparing the sensitivity in within the mentioned range. Optical spectrum analyzer (OSA) was used to record the shift in the Bragg wavelength at different water level. The sensitivity of water level measurement using a silicone rubber diaphragm found to be 9.81 pm/cm for 70 cm in water level, while the sensitivity for polymer plastic diaphragm found to be 2 pm/cm at the same level.

References

Sarath, T. M., SubhaHency, J. P. and Daniel, F. 2013. Level Measurement Using MEMS Pressure Sensor. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering. 3: 118-121.

Bukhari, S. F. A. and Yang, W. 2006. Multi-Interface Level Sensors And New Development In Monitoring And Control Of Oil Separators. Sensors. 6: 380-389.

Krishnamurthy, L., Adler, R., Buonadonna, P., Chhabra, J., Flanigan, M., Kushalnagar, N., Nachman, L. and Yarvis, M. 2005. Design and Deployment of Industrial Sensor Networks:Experiences from a Semiconductor Plant and the North Sea. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference On Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM. 64-75.

Drechsel, M., Rediske, S., Pulvermacher, R. and Peters, D. 2015. Capacitive Liquid Level Sensor. U.S. Patent 8,936,444, issued January 20.

Albin, R. and Cacciola, J. A. 1998. Liquid Level Sensor Utilizing Ac And Resistance. U.S. Patent 5,719,556, issued February 17.

Sengupta, D. and Kishore, P. 2014. Continuous Liquid Level Monitoring Sensor System Using Fiber Bragg Grating. Optical Engineering. 53(1): 017102-017108.

Iwamoto, K. and Kamata, I. 1992. Liquid-Level Sensor With Optical Fibers. Applied optics. 31(1): 51-54.

Chen, Q. and Lu, P. 2008. Fiber Bragg Gratings And Their Applications As Temperature And Humidity Sensors. Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics. 235-260.

Yang, H. Z., Qiao, X. G., Luo, D., Lim, K. S., Chong, W. and Harun, S. W. 2014. A Review Of Recent Developed And Applications Of Plastic Fiber Optic Displacement Sensors. Measurement. 48: 333-345.

Cusano, A., Cutolo, A. and Albert, J. 2011. Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors: Recent Advancements, Industrial Applications And Market Exploitation. Bentham Science Publishers.

Yun, B., Chen, N. and Cui, Y. 2007. Highly Sensitive Liquid-Level Sensor Based On Etched Fiber Bragg Grating. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 19(21): 1747-1749.

Wang, J.-N. and Luo, C.-Y. 2012. Long-Period Fiber Grating Sensors For The Measurement Of Liquid Level And Fluid-Flow Velocity. Sensors. 12(4): 4578-4593.

Guo, T., Zhao, Q., Dou, Q., Zhang, H., Xue, L., Huang, G. and Dong, X. 2005. Temperature-Insensitive Fiber Bragg Grating Liquid-Level Sensor Based On Bending Cantilever Beam. Photonics Technology Letters, IEEE. 17(11): 2400-2402.

Sohn, K.-R. and Shim, J.-H. 2009. Liquid-Level Monitoring Sensor Systems Using Fiber Bragg Grating Embedded In Cantilever. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical. 152(2): 248-251.

Xiaowei, D. and Ruifeng, Z. 2010. Detection Of Liquid-Level Variation Using A Side-Polished Fiber Bragg Grating. Optics & Laser Technology. 42(1): 214-218.

Dong, X., Liu, W. and Zhao, R. 2013. Liquid-Level Sensor Based On Tapered Chirped Fiber Grating. Science China Technological Sciences. 56(2): 471-474.

Sengupta, D., Sai Shankar, M., Saidi Reddy, P., N Sai Prasad, R. L. and Srimannarayana, K. 2010. Axial Strain Based Bragg Grating Level Sensor. Optoelectronics and Advanced Materials. 4(12): 1933-1936.

Kashyap, R. 2009. Fiber Bragg Grating. 2nd ed. USA: Elsevier.

Song, D., Zou, J., Wei, Z., Chen, Z. and Cui, H. 2011. Liquid-Level Sensor Using A Fiber Bragg Grating And Carbon Fiber Composite Diaphragm. Optical Engineering. 50(1): 014401-014405.

Ashby, M. F. 1999. Materials Selection in Mechanical Design. 2nd ed.

http://www.dowcorning.com/content/rubber/.

Sengupta, D. and Srimannarayana, K. 2013. Hydrostatic Pressure Based Liquid Level Sensing Using FBG: A Comparative Study. International Conference on Optics in Precision Engineering and Nanotechnology (icOPEN2013). International Society for Optics and Photonics. 87691X-87696X.

Downloads

Published

2016-06-23

How to Cite

COMPARISON OF WATER LEVEL MEASUREMENT PERFORMANCE FOR TWO DIFFERENT TYPES OF DIAPHRAGM USING FIBER BRAGG GRATING BASED OPTICAL SENSORS. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(6-11). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9203