PERFORMANCE OF STONE MASTIC ASPHALT MIX USING SELECTED FIBRES

Authors

  • Ahmad Kamil Arshad Institute for Infrastructure Engineering and Sustainability, UiTM Shah Alam, Malaysia
  • Syahirah Mansor Faculty of Civil Engineering, UiTM Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
  • Ekarizan Shafie Faculty of Civil Engineering, UiTM Shah Alam, Malaysia
  • Wardati Hashim Faculty of Civil Engineering, UiTM Shah Alam, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9498

Keywords:

Stone mastic asphalt, synthetic fibre, natural fibre

Abstract

Stone Mastic Asphalt (SMA) is a gap-graded asphalt mixture that depends on the stone-to-stone contact to provide its load carrying capacity against rutting. However, binder draindown is a problem for SMA mixtures, due to its intentional high binder content. This paper details the performance evaluation of two different cellulose fibres used in SMA14 mix; synthetic fibre (Viatop66) and natural fibre (Kenaf) to prevent binder drainage. The cellulose fibres, 0.3 percent by weight of the mixture, were uniformly combined with the dried aggregate before the asphalt cement was added during mixing process. Laboratory specimens were prepared using 50 blows of the Marshall hammer per side. The Optimum Binder Content (OBC) for the SMA14 mix with Viatop66 was found to be 6.1 percent, while the OBC for the SMA14 mix with Kenaf was found to be 5.9 percent. Rut depth obtained for SMA14 mix Kenaf was lower (1.6 mm) compared with SMA14 mix with Viatop66 (1.8 mm).  The tensile strength ratio recorded for both mixes are greater than 80 percent, indicating adequate stripping resistance. The fibres were found to interact well with other substances in the SMA14 mix using the Environment Scanning Electron Microscopy (ESEM). This indicates that the natural fibre could efficiently retain the binder in the mix. Therefore, natural fibre (Kenaf) could be an alternative material to replace the synthetic fibre for the SMA14 mixture. 

References

Blazejowski, K. 2011. Stone Matrix Asphalt Theory and Practice. CRC Press.

Allen, G. K. 2006. Problems of Stone Mastic Asphalt Use in North Queensland. A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Engineering and Surveying, University of Southern Queensland.

Muniandy, R., Ishak, S., Hassim, S., & Umar, R. 2001. A Study on the Use of Oil Palm Fibre in Rubberized Stone Mastic Asphalt. Journal of Road Engineering Association of Asia and Australia (REAAA). 8(2): 14-22.

Vijayasegaran, S. and Wong C. C. 2002. Kenaf Research and Development in Malaysia. MARDI Occasional paper No. 4/2002.

Liew, K. C., Phiong, S. K., & Chong, E. W. N. 2012. Effect of Different Kenaf Core Contents and Sizes as Filler on the Properties of Road. Journal of Asian Scientific Research. 2(1): 25-30.

JKR Malaysia. 2008. Standard Specification For Road Works - Section 4: Flexible Pavement (JKR/SPJ/2008-S4). Jabatan Kerja Raya Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.

American Society for Testing and Materials. 1997. Resistance to Plastic Flow of Bituminous Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus, ASTM D 1559.

AASHTO. 2007. Standard Method of Test for Determining Resistance of Compacted Bituminous Mixture to Moisture-Induced Damage. AASHTO Standard T 283-07, AASHTO, Washington DC.

AASHTO. 2003. Standard Method of Test for Determining Dynamic Modulus of Hot-Mix Asphalt Concrete Mixtures, AASHTO Provisional Standards TP62-03, AASHTO, Washington DC.

AASHTO. 2006. Standard Method of Test for Determining Rutting Susceptibility of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) using the Asphalt Pavement Analyzer (APA), AASHTO Provisional Standards TP63, AASHTO, Washington DC.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-26

Issue

Section

Science and Engineering

How to Cite

PERFORMANCE OF STONE MASTIC ASPHALT MIX USING SELECTED FIBRES. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(7-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9498