THE MECHANICS OF THE PRESENTATION MINING FRAMEWORK

Authors

  • Vinothini Kasinathana Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43000 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Masrah Azrifah Azmi Murad Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43000 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Rahmita Wirza Rahmat Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43000 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Evi Indriasari Mansor Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43000 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
  • Aida Mustapha Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia, 86400 Batu Pahat, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9545

Keywords:

Presentation mining, text mining, keyphrase extraction

Abstract

This paper presents the mechanics of a presentation mining system that mines keywords and key phrases from a collection of PowerPoint slides and generates a mind map using the extracted words and phrases. The core of presentation mining lies in two stages; ranking the potential phrases and extracting the keywords and key phrases. The keywords and key phrases form a mind map, which is then evaluated against a domain ontology. The results of recall and precision are also compared between the existing key phrase extraction system called the KP-Miner and the proposed presentation mining system. The key phrase extraction algorithm by the proposed presentation mining system achieved higher recall and precision than KP-Miner, hence producing a more accurate visualization of the PowerPoint slides in the form of mind map.

References

Kasinathan, V., Mustapha, A. 2015. Ontology Support for Web-based Presentation Mining. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advanced Data and Information Engineering, 25 - 26 April 2015, Bali, Indonesia.

Turkington, C., & Harris, J. 2006. The Encyclopedia of Learning Disabilities.

Paulraj, S. J., Ali, A. R., & Vetrayan, J. 2013. Learning Style Preferences among Diploma Students of Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research. 14(5): 603-609.

Jubilo, A. B., & Faller, M. 2013. Index of Learning Styles of Engineering and Architecture Students for SY 2011-2012. Retrieved September, 2015.

Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R. W., Noy, N. F., & Musen, M. A. 2004. The Protégé OWL plugin: An Open Development Environment For Semantic Web Applications. In The Semantic Web–ISWC 2004. 229-243. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Knublauch, H., Fergerson, R. W., Noy, N. F., & Musen, M. A. 2004. The Protégé OWL plugin: An Open Development Environment For Semantic Web Applications. In The Semantic Web–ISWC 2004. 229-243. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Walker & Zur, A. W. 2015. On Digital Immigrants and Digital Natives: How the Digital Divide Affects Families, Educational Institutions, and the Workplace.

Weimer, M. 2012. Does PowerPoint Help or Hinder Learning?

Ding, X., & Liu, J. 2012. Advantages and Disadvantages of PowerPoint in Lectures to Science.

Zhang, S., & Elhadad, N. 2013. Unsupervised Biomedical Named Entity Recognition: Experiments With Clinical And Biological Texts.

Kasinathan, V., Mustapha, A., & Rani, M. F. 2013. Structured-based Algorithm for Presentation Mapping in Graphical Knowledge Display

Finkel, J. R. 2007. March Named Entity Recognition and the Stanford NER Software.

Zhou, G., & Su, J. 2002. Named Entity Recognition using an HMM-Based Chunk Tagger.

Robin. 2009. Part-of-Speech Tagging

Toutanova, K., & Manning, C. D. 2000. Enriching the Knowledge Sources used in a Maximum Entropy Part-of-Speech Tagger. In Proceedings of the 2000 Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora. In conjunction with the 38th Annual Meeting of the Association for

Computational Linguistics-Volume 13. 63-70. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. D., & Singer, Y. 2003. Feature-rich Part-of-speech Tagging with a Cyclic Dependency Network. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology-Volume 1. 173-180. Association for Computational Linguistics.

Russel, S., & Norvig, P. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 2003. EUA: Prentice Hall.

Turney, P. D. 2000. Learning Algorithms for Keyphrase Extraction. Information Retrieval. 2(4): 303-336

Witten, I. H., Paynter, G. W., Frank, E., Gutwin, C., & Nevill-Manning, C. G. 1999. KEA: Practical Automatic Keyphrase Extraction. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries. 254-255. ACM.

El-Beltagy, S. R. 2006. KP-Miner: A Simple System for Effective Keyphrase Extraction. In Innovations in Information Technology. 1-5. IEEE.

Downloads

Published

2016-08-04

How to Cite

THE MECHANICS OF THE PRESENTATION MINING FRAMEWORK. (2016). Jurnal Teknologi, 78(8-2). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v78.9545