Cognitive Reading Strategies Employed by Form Three Malaysian English as Second Language (ESL) Students

Authors

  • Jessica Abisheganathan Jeevaratnam Language Academy, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Mahani Stapa Language Academy, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v7n1.93

Abstract

Previous studies reported that many low proficiency students have poor comprehension skills. Therefore, this research aims to study the cognitive reading strategies employed by ESL (English as Second Language) students and suggest appropriate cognitive strategies to be utilized by low proficiency students. This research was carried out in one of the secondary schools in Pasir Gudang, Johor. The purposive sample for this study consists of 60 Form 3 students (30 low proficiency and 30 high proficiency). Explanatory sequential mixed method design was used to carry out this research. The data collected via questionnaire, observation and interview for this research is analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. Descriptive analysis was used to analyse data gained from questionnaire and observation whereas for the interview data, extracts from the interviews were used to corroborate the findings. The findings reveal that the most common cognitive reading strategies employed by both group of students are skimming and translation. This research further highlights the most significant difference in reading strategies between both groups of students, which is, the high proficiency group outperformed the low proficiency group in overall strategy use, demonstrating the most frequent use of the strategies. Most prominently, in this research, the reading strategies that are deemed appropriate for the low proficiency students are highlighted. These strategies include four cognitive strategies; guessing, elaboration, summarizing and prediction.

References

Askari, H. 2013. Contextual Guessing Strategy. Germany: Lambert Academic Publishing

Austin Community College. 2000. Taking Effective Notes. Retrieved from http://sites.austincc.edu/student-skills-workshops/taking-effective-notes/.

Aziz, N. A., Rahim, S. A., Harun, E. H., Adzmi, N. A., Ahmat, H., Bidin, S. and Shaharudin, M. R. 2011. The Reading Strategies Awareness among English as a Second Language (ESL) Learners in Malaysia’s University. Theory and Practice in Language Studies. 1(7).

Bakhtiarvand, M. 2008. The Effect of Contextual Guessing Strategy on Vocabulary Recognition in Reading Comprehension texts of Iranian EFL Junior High School students. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234154921_The_Effect_of_Contextual_Guessing_StrategyOn_Vocabulary_Recognition_in_ReadingComprehension_texts_of_Iranian_EFLJunior_High_school_students.

Brown, D. H. 1994. Teaching by Principles. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents.

Brown, D. L. and Briggs, L. D. 1989. Success in Reading: Four Characteristics of Strategic Readers. Retrieved from http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1650&context=reading_horizons

Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. 1996. A Quasi-experimental Validation of Transactional Strategies Instruction with Low-achieving Second-grade Readers. Journal of Educational Psychology. 88: 18-37.

Cameron, S. 2009. Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies: A Practical Classroom Guide. Pearson: North Shore New Zealand.

Carrell, P. L., & Grabe, W. 2002. Reading. In N. Schmitt (Ed.). An Introduction to Applied Linguistics. London: Arnold. 233-250.

Chan, C. K. K., Burtis, J., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. 1992. Constructive Activity in Learning from Text. American Educational Research Journal. 29: 97-118.

Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. 1989. Self-explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science. 13: 145-182.

Chinn, C. A. 2006. Learning to Argue. In A. M. O'Donnell, C. Hmelo-Silver, & G. Erkens (Eds.). Collaborative Learning, Reasoning, and Technology Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 355-383.

Culver, T. F. & Morse, L. W. 2008. The Teaching Professor. Retrieved from https://www.canadacollege.edu/inside/CIETL/getting_students_to_read.pdf.

Duke, N. K. & Pearson, P. D. 2002. Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.). What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction. Third Edition. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. 205-242.

Gorjian, B., Hayati, A., and Sheykhiani, M. J. 2000. The Role of Gisting and Contextual Guessing Reading Strategies in Learners’ Performance in Multiple-choice Cloze Tests of Reading Comprehension. Retrived from http://www.ukm.my/solls09/Proceeding/PDF/Bahman,%20hayati%20et%20al.pdf.

Graham, S., MacArthur, C., & Schwartz, S. 1995. Effects of Goal Setting and Procedural Facilitation on the Revising Behaviors and Writing Performance of Students with Writing and Learning Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology. 87: 230-240.

Gunning, T. G. 1996. Creating Reading Instruction for All Children. Chapter 6, 192-236.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., et al. 2004. Increasing Reading Comprehension and Engagement through Concept-oriented Reading Instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology. 96: 403-423.

Halim, A. and Mohamed, M. 2006. Knowledge of Linguistic Cues among Malay EFL Students and Teachers’ Practices in the Teaching of Reading Skills. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research. 7(2)

Irwin, J. W. 2006. Teaching Reading Comprehension Processes. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Jiraphatralikhit, J., Klinpoon, S., & Kaewjan, S. 2005. An Analysis of Strategies in Translation of the Movie Subtitle: Behind the Painting. Research Gate. 1: 54-71.

Jones, R. 2007. Strategies for Reading Comprehension: Summarizing. Retrieved from http://www.readingquest.org/strat/summarize.html.

Julius, A. T. 2015. Appraisal of Seven Critical Reading Strategies Employed by Teachers in Ogun State Senior Secondary Schools to Teach Reading Comprehension. African Journal for Psychological and Social Sciences Issues. 18(1).

Karami, H. 2008. Reading Strategies: What Are They? Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED502937.pdf.

Khoshsima, H. and Tiyar, F. R. 2014. The Effect of Summarizing Strategy on Reading Comprehension of Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 2(3): 134-139.

King, K. 2008. Reading Strategies. Retrieved from http://www.isu.edu/~kingkath/readstrt.html.

Koda, K. 2007. Reading and Language Learning: Crosslinguistic Constraints on Second Language Reading Development. Language Learning. 57(1): 1-44.

Kojima, H. and Narita, H. 2004. The Effects of Word Guessing Strategy Instruction on Reading Comprehension. Retrieved from http://repository.ul.hirosaki-u.ac.jp/dspace/html/10129/539/AN00211590_91_75.pdf.

Kucukoglu, H. 2013. Improving Reading Skills through Effective Reading Strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 70.

Liao, P. S. 2006. EFL Learners Beliefs About Strategy Use of Translation in English Learning. RELC Journal. 37(2): 191-215.

Longman, D. and Atkinson, R. 1999. College Learning and Study Skills. Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

Marzano, R. 2010. Teaching Inference. Educational Leadership. 67(7): 80-01. Retrived from http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/apr10/vol67/num07/Teaching-Inference.aspx.

Mohamed, A. R., Chew, J. & Kabilan, M. K. 2006. Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Good Malaysian Chinese Learners. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research. MELTA.

Nietfeld, J. L. and Shraw, G. 2002. The Effect of Knowledge and Strategy Explanation on Monitoring Accuracy. Journal of Educational Research. 95.

Nordin, N. M., Rashid, S. M., Zubir, S. I. S. and Sadjirin, R. 2013. Differences in Reading Strategies: How ESL Learners Really Read. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 90.

O’Malley, J. M. and Chamot, A. U. 1990. Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. London: Cambridge University Press

Oxford, R. 1990. Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. New York: Newbury House Publishers.

Pakzadian, M. and Rasekh, A. E. 2012. The Effects of Using Summarization Strategies on Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. English Linguistics Research. 1(1).

Pani, S. 2004. Reading Strategy Instruction through Mental Modeling. ELT Journal. 58: 355-362.

Pearson, P. D., & Fielding, L. 1996. Comprehension Instruction. In R.Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal,& P. D. Pearson (Eds.). Handbook of Reading Research. 2: 815-860. White Plains, NY: Longman.

Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. 2005. Fluency: Bridge between Decoding and Reading Comprehension. Reading Teacher. 58: 510-519.

Prichard, C. 2014. Reading Strategy Use of Low- and High-Proficiency Learners and the Effect of Reading Instruction. Retrieved from http://ousar.lib.okayama-u.ac.jp/file/53178/bhe_010_115_122.pdf.

Que, H. T. K. 2011. Improving Students' Reading Comprehension through Predicting Strategy Instruction: An Action Research at Cao Ba Quat Upper Secondary school. Retrieved from http://repositories.vnu.edu.vn/jspui/bitstream/123456789/38700/1/Microsoft%20Word%20-%20Tom%20tat%20luan%20van.pdf.

Raj, A. S. 2008. The Effectiveness of the Question and Answer Relationship (QAR) Strategy in Enhancing Reading Comprehension among ESL Students. Faculty of Education and Languages: Open University Malaysia.

Rea, D. M. & Mercuri, S. P. 2006. Research-based Strategies for English Language Learners. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Richards, J. C., Platt, J. and Platt, H. 1992. Longman Dictionary of Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. London: Longman. Beijing.

Richek, M. A, Caldwell, J. A., Jennings, J. H. & Lerner, J. W. 2002. Reading Problems–Assessment and Teaching Strategies. Boston, Massachusetts: Pearson Education Company.

Row, B. & Smith, S. 2005. Teaching Reading in Today's Middle Schools. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Samiyan, L. V. & Khorasani, S. R. 2014. The Comparison between Contextual Guessing Strategies vs. Memorizing a List of Isolated Words in Vocabulary Learning Regarding Long Term Memory. International Journal of Science Culture and Sport. 3(1): 12-18. Retrieved from http://www.iscsjournal.com/Makaleler/933207334_3.sayi_ic-sayfalar_2leyla.pdf.

Semtin, S. A. and Maniam, M. 2015. Reading Strategies among ESL Malaysian Secondary School Students. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 4(2).

Setiasih, L. 2015. Chunking, Elaborating and Mapping Strategies in Teaching Reading Comprehension Using Content Area Materials. World Journal of English Language. 5(1): 32-47. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273487085_Chunking_Elaborating_and_Mapping_Strategies_in_Teaching_Reading_Comprehension_Using_Content_Area_Materials.

Stuck, A. 2000. Setting a Purpose. Retrieved from http://www.ohiorc.org/adlit/strategy/strategy_each.aspx?id=1.

Tamsi, R. K., Zuhri, F. and Kurniasih, E. 2013. The Implementation of Skimming and Scanning Strategies in Teaching Reading Narrative Text to the Tenth Grade Students of SMAN 21 SURABAYA. Retrived from http://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/2618/4577.

Vacca, R. T. and Vacca, J. L. 1999. Content Area Reading: Literacy and Learning Across the Curriculum. NewYork:Longman.

Walsh, R. 2014. The Power of Rereading. Retrieved from http://russonreading.blogspot.my/2014/12/the-power-of-rereading.html.

Zwiers, J. 2005. Building Reading Comprehension Habits in Grades 6–12. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cognitive Reading Strategies Employed by Form Three Malaysian English as Second Language (ESL) Students. (2020). LSP International Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v7n1.93