Shaping Scholars Across Borders: The Journey of Chinese Doctoral Students in Malaysia

Authors

  • Xixi Lu Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
  • Hadina Habil Language Academy, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v11.22563

Keywords:

Academic identity, International Doctoral Students, Intercultural Communication Competence (ICC), supervision, community

Abstract

There has been a surge in the number of individuals from China undertaking their doctoral studies in Malaysia. However, it is complicated to cultivate international doctoral students in an intercultural environment. Current research has been widely conducted to explore the experiences and qualities of international doctoral learning, but there is little attention paid to the transformation of the intercultural academic identity of the students. This study takes a perspective of acculturation theory to examine how Chinese international doctoral students reconstruct their academic identity in a new environment in Malaysia to complete their research goals. A qualitative semi-structured interview method was adopted to gain an in-depth perception, and 8 Chinese doctoral students in a Malaysian research-intensive university were interviewed. Themes are analyzed by using the software ATLAS.ti 24, and intercultural communication competence (ICC), intercultural supervision, and learning community influence the academic identity construction. Moreover, ICC is the core element, from which other relevant factors can play a more effective role in intercultural academic identity transformation. This research forms a model of how international doctoral students’ academic identity can be functionally constructed. Furthermore, it has implications for international students to improve their overall learning experiences and ultimately complete their PhD successfully.

References

Ai, B. (2017). Constructing an academic identity in Australia: An autoethnographic narrative. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(6), 1095–1107.

Ali, M., Arifin, W. L., & Muttaqin, Z. (2022). Hasan Aydin Having the First Year as Overseas Students. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 9(2), 66–80.

Anikina, Z., Goncharova, L., & Evseeva, A. (2020). Constructing academic identity in the changing Russian higher education context: Preliminary perspectives. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(5), 855–868.

Ashmore, R. D., Deaux, K., & McLaughlin-Volpe, T. (2004). An organizing framework for collective identity: Articulation and significance of multidimensionality. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 80–114.

Aspland, T., Datta, P., & Talukdar, J. (2021). Transitioning into the Australian higher education experience: The perspective of international doctoral students (AUR 63 02). Australian Universities Review, 63(2), 44–54.

Baydarova, I. (2023). The impact of neoliberal education on the alignment of student–supervisor expectations in Malaysia. Higher Education Research and Development, 42(3), 544–558.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2).

Buirski, N. (2022). ‘Ways of being’: A model for supportive doctoral supervisory relationships and supervision. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(5).

Cerulo, K. A. (1997). Identity Construction: New Issues, New Directions. Annu. Rev. Sociol., 23. www.annualreviews.org.

Chen, G.-M., & Starosta, W. J. (1996). Intercultural communication competence: A synthesis. Annals of the International Communication Association, 19(1), 353–383.

Choi, L. J. (2021). The identity (re)construction of international students in the process of academic literacy acquisition. Teaching in Higher Education, 26(4).

Clegg, S. (2008). Academic identities under threat? British Educational Research Journal, 34(3), 329–345.

Dai, K., & Elliot, D. L. (2023). ‘Shi men’ as key doctoral practice: understanding international doctoral students’ learning communities and research culture in China. Oxford Review of Education, 49(5), 588–603.

Dai, K., & Hardy, I. (2021). The micro-politics of cultural change: A Chinese doctoral student’s learning journey in Australia. Oxford Review of Education, 47(2), 243–259.

Dai, K., Hu, Y., Li, X., & Oladipo, O. (2023). Conducting doctoral research in China: an exploration of international students’ motivation to study at Chinese universities. Higher Education Research and Development, 42(5), 1133–1149.

Elliot, D. L., Baumfield, V., & Reid, K. (2016). Searching for ‘a third space’: A creative pathway towards international PhD students’ academic acculturation. Higher Education Research and Development, 35(6), 1180–1195.

Hu, Y., van Veen, K., & Corda, A. (2016). Pushing too little, praising too much? Intercultural misunderstandings between a chinese PhD student and a Dutch supervisor. Studying Teacher Education, 12(1), 70–87.

Hu, Y., Zhao, X., & van Veen, K. (2020). Unraveling the implicit challenges in fostering independence: Supervision of Chinese doctoral students at Dutch universities. Instructional Science, 48(2), 205–221.

Kidman, J., Manathunga, C., & Cornforth, S. (2017). Intercultural PhD supervision: exploring the hidden curriculum in a social science faculty doctoral programme. Higher Education Research and Development, 36(6), 1208–1221.

Kim, Y. Y. (2017). Integrative Communication theory of cross‐cultural adaptation. The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 1–13). Wiley.

Nguyet Nguyen, M., & Robertson, M. J. (2022). International students enacting agency in their PhD journey. Teaching in Higher Education, 27(6), 814–830.

Pinto, S. (2020). Encounters of cultures in doctoral supervision: Productive or problematic? Revista Lusofona de Educacao, 48(48), 151–167.

Pinto, S. (2023). International doctoral students’ perspectives on the qualities of supervisors: Expectations for intercultural supervision in Portuguese higher education. Research in Comparative and International Education.

Singh, J. K. N. (2021). Academic resilience among international students: lived experiences of postgraduate international students in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(1), 129–138. Springer Science and Business Media B.V.

Soong, H., Thi Tran, L., & Hoa Hiep, P. (2015). Being and becoming an intercultural doctoral student: reflective autobiographical narratives. Reflective Practice, 16(4), 435–448.

Wu, M., & Hu, Y. (2020). Transitioning to an independent researcher: reconciling the conceptual conflicts in cross-cultural doctoral supervision. Studies in Continuing Education, 42(3), 333–348.

Xu, L. (2017). Written feedback in intercultural doctoral supervision: a case study. Teaching in Higher Education, 22(2), 239–255.

Xu, L., & Grant, B. (2017). International doctoral students’ becoming: A dialogic perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(6), 570–579.

Xu, L., & Hu, J. (2020). Language feedback responses, voices and identity (re)construction: Experiences of Chinese international doctoral students. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(6), 724–735.

Xu, L., Teng, L. S., & Cai, J. (2021). Feedback engagement of Chinese international doctoral students. Studies in Continuing Education, 43(1), 119–135.

Xu, X. (2023). An autoethnography of an international doctoral student’s multidimensional identity construction. Australian Educational Researcher, 50(5).

Yasmin, F., Li, S., Zhang, Y., Poulova, P., & Akbar, A. (2021). Unveiling the international students’ perspective of service quality in Chinese higher education institutions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11).

Zheng, G., Cai, Y., & Zuo, B. (2023). Cultivating Global Scholars: Delving into Chinese Doctoral Students’ Integration Experiences at Finnish Universities Through an Institutional Logics Lens. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shaping Scholars Across Borders: The Journey of Chinese Doctoral Students in Malaysia. (2024). LSP International Journal, 11(2), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.11113/lspi.v11.22563