ECO DRAINAGE MODEL USING POROUS PAVING BLOCK WITH SIEVE WASTE CORAL FILLER AND PUMICE STONE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v15.24032Keywords:
coeficient runoff, paving, grass block, waste, pumice, runoff coefficient.Abstract
Environmental problems in the form of changes in land use have an impact on the degradation of land carrying capacity. Rapid urban growth with various paving materials causes various problems such as reduced water absorption, increased surface runoff and puddles and reduced infiltration and percolation capacity. The most extreme condition of paving use is flooding. In overcoming the problem of reducing the impact on waterproof pavement in residential, office and industrial areas, pavement modification with the eco-drain concept is needed. The eco-drain concept is to use porous paving blocks with fillers. The paving blocks used are grass blocks whose cavities/pores are filled with natural stone in the form of sifted waste rock and pumice. The purpose of the study is to obtain an environmentally friendly pavement model that can reduce surface runoff, prevent puddles and conserve groundwater. The modeling results show an average reduction in surface runoff on paving blocks with sieved waste filler of up to 20%, while with pumice filler the reduction in runoff is greater, up to 25 - 30%. The value of the surface runoff coefficient (C) for hexagonal paving block land cover ranges from 0.327 - 0.492. While the value of the runoff coefficient for porous paving blocks with sieved waste stone filler is: 0.302 ˗ 0.411 and for paving block land cover with pumice filler is 0.267 ˗ 0.396.
References
Ralph A. S., 1986. Urban vegetation impacts on the hydrology of Dayton, Ohio. Urban Ecology. 9: 361-376, DOI: 10.1016/0304-4009(86)90009-4.
Antonio, J.A., Javier, V.A., 2019. Concepción Pla, Francisco Gomariz-Castillo, Impact of Land Use Changes on Flash Flood Prediction Using A Sub-Daily SWAT Model In Five Mediterranean Ungauged Watersheds (SE Spain), Science of The Total Environment. 657: 1578-1591. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.034.
Roberta, P., Šárka, H., Zora, S., 2022. Surface Runoff Response to Long-Term Land Use Changes: Spatial Rearrangement of Runoff-Generating Areas Reveals A Shift In Flash Flood Drivers. Science of The Total Environment. 815. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151591
Andrzej, Tomasz, S., 2019. Influence Of Land Cover Data Sources on Estimation of Direct Runoff According To SCS-CN And Modified SME Methods. Catena, 172: 232-242. DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2018.08.032.
Meysam, K., Madjid, D., Massoud, T., 2017. Evaluation Of Permeable Pavement Responses to Urban Surface Runoff. Journal of Environmental Management. 187: 43-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.027.
Castro, D., Angullo, G., Rodriuez, J., and Calzada, M. A. 2007. The Influence of Paving-Block Shape on the Infiltration Capacity of Permeable Paving. Land Contamination & Reclamation. 15(3): 335 – 344. DOI: 10.2462/09670513.855
Marc Gimenez-Maranges, Jürgen Breuste, Angela Hof, 2020, Sustainable Drainage Systems for Transitioning to Sustainable Urban Flood Management in The European Union. A Review, Journal of Cleaner Production. 255, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120191.
M.I. Rodríguez-Rojas, F. Huertas-Fernández, B. Moreno, G. Martínez, A.L. Grindlay, 2018. A Study of The Application of Permeable Pavements as A Sustainable Technique for The Mitigation of Soil Sealing In Cities: A Case Study In The South Of Spain. Journal of Environmental Management. 205: 151-162, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.075.
Navaratnam Rathivarman, Sivakumar Yutharshan, Alakenthiran Kabishangar, Vignarajah Janani, Sivakumar Gowthaman, Thiloththama Hiranya Kumari Nawarathna, Meiqi Chen, Satoru Kawasaki, 2024, Evaluating the Performance and Durability of Concrete Paving Blocks Enhanced by Bio-Cement Posttreatment. Biogeotechnics. 3. DOI: 10.1016/j.bgtech.2024.100103.
Sedyowati, L., Suhardjono, Suhartono, E., and Sholichin, M., 2017. Runoff Velocity Behaviour on Smooth Pavement and Paving Blocks Surface Measured by A Tilted Plot. Faculty of Engineering. Journal Water and Land Development. 33: 149–156. DOI: 10.1515/jwld-2017-0030
D. Armson, P. Stringer, A.R. Ennos, 2013, The Effect of Street Trees and Amenity Grass on Urban Surface Water Runoff in Manchester, UK. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 12: 282-286. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.04.001.
J. Li, Z.X. Zhou. 2015. Coupled Analysis on Landscape Pattern and Hydrological Processes in Yanhe Watershed Of China. Science of The Total Environment. 505: 927-938. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.068.
Buda, A.R., 2013, Surface-Runoff Generation and Forms of Overland Flow. Treatise on Geomorphology. 12: 73-84. DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-374739-6.00151-2
Yasa, I. W., Setiawan, A., Sulistiyono, H., Negara , I. D., Pracoyo, A., Saidah, H., and Gusari, L. 2023. The Effect of Grass Block Paving on Runoff Coefficient. Civil Engineering and Architecture, 11: 1688-1694. DOI: 10.13189/cea.2023.110405
Christiansen, J.E. 1942. Irrigation by Sprinkling. University of California Agricultural Experiment.Station Bulletin n. 670, 124.
Ronalton Evandro Machado, Tais Oliveira Cardoso, Matheus Henrique Mortene, 2022. Determination Of Runoff Coefficient (C) In Catchments Based On Analysis Of Precipitation And Flow Events. International Soil and Water Conservation Research. 10: 208-216. DOI: doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.09.001.
R. Merz, G. Blöschl, J. Parajka, 2006. Spatio-Temporal Variability Of Event Runoff Coefficients. Journal of Hydrology.331: 591-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2006.06.008.
