CRITICAL RISK ANALYSIS OF TOLL ROAD PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PHASE

Authors

  • Fahira Rhomianti Putri School of Master Program in Civil Engineering and Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Sriwijaya University, 30128, Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Betty Susanti School of Master Program in Civil Engineering and Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Sriwijaya University, 30128, Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia
  • Mona Foralisa Toyfur School of Master Program in Civil Engineering and Planning, Faculty of Engineering, Sriwijaya University, 30128, Palembang, South Sumatera, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.19462

Keywords:

Critical Risk Analysis, Indonesia, Toll Road, PPP, Construction Phase

Abstract

Limited funding in meeting the financing needs for the provision of toll road infrastructure makes the government need to look for alternative financing so that the project can still be carried out. Public Private Partnership (PPP) is an alternative option to overcome this problem. However, infrastructure projects with PPP schemes require large investments and a relatively long concession period, thus allowing risk uncertainty to arise as a result of decisions made during the project. Risk identification in a construction project is important at the beginning of the project. This study was aimed at identifying critical risks, determining risk allocation and risk mitigation strategies, and analyzing the interrelationship between critical risks. The case study was conducted on the Trans Sumatra toll road project in South Sumatra. Quantitative data (questionnaire survey) and qualitative data (interview) were collected from the toll-road private sector. The results of the study identified five critical risks in the construction phase (CP) of the toll road project along with the allocation of risks, namely the risks of geographical conditions (shared), delays in work progress (private sector), design errors (private sector), force majeure (shared) and weather conditions (shared). The mitigation strategy for the risks of geographical conditions and design errors was to redesign the construction structure by adjusting with the land conditions of the toll road. Force majeure (Covid-19) causing delays in work progress required rescheduling and recalculation of construction costs. Weather conditions (heavy rain) occurring on swampy land caused puddles/floods; this condition caused delays in construction work. The mitigation strategy that could be carried out was by coordinating with the Indonesian Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics Agency (BMKG) in the region and preparing disaster management Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). The cause and effect of each risk showed that the critical risks in the construction phase of the toll road project were interrelated to each other which the risks would finally contribute to the increase in the construction costs of the toll road project.

References

Ministry of Finance. 2021. PPP is not privatization/privatization. [Online]. Available: https://kpbu.kemenkeu.go.id/read/23-228/umum/tentang-kpbu/kpbu-bukan-privatisasi-swastanisasi. [Accessed: December 2, 2021]

T. Déau and J. Touati. 2017. Using PPPs to fund critical greenfield infrastructure projects. McKinsey & Company. 49-53. [Online]. Available: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-sector/our-insights/using-ppps-to-fund-critical-greenfield-infrastructure-projects. Retrieved date: [September 17, 2021]

G. Hodge, G. Carsten, and E. B. Anthony. 2010. International handbook on public–private partnerships. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.

A. Nguyen, A. Mollik, and Y.-Y. Chih. 2018. Managing critical risks affecting the financial viability of public–private partnership projects: Case study of toll road projects in Vietnam. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 144 (12): 05018014-1, DOI: 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001571.

T. H. Diez. 2015. PPP on toll road in Indonesia. Escola Tecnica Superior d’Enginyeria Industrial. Barcelona.

L. B. Sihombing, Y. Latief, A. D. Rarasati, and A. Wibowo. 2018. Project financing models for toll road investments: A state-of-the-art literature review. Civil Engineering and Architecture 6 (3): 115–127. DOI: 10.13189/cea.2018.060301.

M. Wraharjo. 2021. Evaluation of toll road financial feasibility (Case study: Kayu Agung - Palembang - Betung section). Sriwijaya. Palembang. Indonesia.

HK. 2021. Daily traffic data trans Sumatra toll road. Annual report.

A. Wibowo. 2012. Inflation in toll road investment financial Analysis: Its treatment and effect on the private sector and government. Journal of Civil Engineering 19 (1): 15-24. DOI: 10.5614/jts.2012.19.1.2.

A. E. Yadeta. 2020. Critical risks in construction projects in Ethiopia. Journal of Advanced Research in Civil Engineering and Architecture 8(3): 30-40. DOI: 10.33422/jarcea.2019.10.35.

D. Turner. 2019. Are your critical risks under control?. A myosh. [Online]. Available: https://myosh.com/blog/2019/12/03/are-your-critical-risks-under-control/. [Accessed: January 10, 2022]

OECD. 2014. Recommendation of the council on the governance of critical risks. [Online]. Available: https://accendoreliability.com/critical-risks-enterprise-risk-management/. [Accessed: August 23, 2022]

Public Works government regulation No. 1/ 2021. Concerning procedure for procurement of private sector for toll road enterprises. 1–38. [Online]. Available: https://jdih.pu.go.id/detail-dokumen/2882/1. [Accessed: December 2, 2021]

M. A. Wibowo, J. U. . Hadmoko, and A. Nurdiana. 2012. Risk management in Indonesia construction project: A case study of a toll road project. Intech. 6: 121-138.

Ministry of Pubic Work. 2005. Pd T-01-2005-B about building guidelines for toll road investment risk analysis. Guideline book. Publisher: Ministry of Public Works Research and Development Agency

PT.PII.2021. Risk Allocation. [Online]. Available: https://ptpii.co.id/alokasi-risiko. Retrieved date: [June 9, 2022]

I. Gede and P. Joni. 2012. Risks Management Project. Civil Engineering Scientific Journal 16(1): 48–55. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79457.

M. M. Sanaky, L. M. Saleh, and H. D. Titaley. 2021. Analysis of the delay factors in the construction project of the Man 1 Tulehu dormitory building, Central Maluku. Jurnal Simetrik 11 (1): 432-439. DOI: 10.31959/js.v11i1.615.

I. Fanani, S. Djati, and K. Silvanita. 2017. The effect of organizational commitment and job satisfaction on organizational citizenship behavior. Fundamental management journal. 1(1): 40-53. DOI: 10.36226/jrmb.v2i3.74.

L. Bing, A. Akintoye, P. J. Edwards, and C. Hardcastle. 2005. The allocation of risk in PPP/PFI construction projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management. 23 (1): 25–35. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2004.04.006.

L. Yanuarni, H. Christady, and S. H. T. Utomo. 2018. The effectiveness of using the vacuum preloading method on the Palembang- Indralaya toll road construction project. [Online]. Available: http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/. [Accessed: September 3, 2022]

M. Harissa, F. W. Mutiara, Sukarman, and I. Sulianti. 2014. Comparison of vacuum loading and preloading methods to speed up the consolidation process. Pillar: Journal of Civil Engineering, 2(2): 12–25.

R. Wahyudi. 2019. Feasibility analysis of toll road investment due to the risk of project delay and traffic prediction errors (case study: pejagan pemalang toll road). Journal of Civil Engineering Project 2(2): 14–23. DOI: https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/potensi

A. Sandhyavitri and N. Saputra. 2013. Pre-construction phase toll road risk analysis (Case study of the Pekanbaru-Dumai toll road). Journal of Civil Engineering 9(1): 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28932/jts.v9i1.1366

BPS, 2022. Rainfall data for South Sumatra Province. [Online]. Available: https://sumsel.bps.go.id/indicator/151/220/2/curah-hujan.html [Accessed: September 3,2022].

Downloads

Published

2023-08-30

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

CRITICAL RISK ANALYSIS OF TOLL ROAD PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) PROJECT CONSTRUCTION PHASE. (2023). ASEAN Engineering Journal, 13(3), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v13.19462