NONLINEAR SIMULATIONS TO EVALUATE THE CODE-BASED RESPONSE MODIFICATION FACTOR FOR SEISMIC DESIGN OF SLAB-ON-PILE STRUCTURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v14.20155Keywords:
SOP structure, spun pile, response modification factor, performance-based evaluation, nonlinear analysisAbstract
Slab on Pile (SOP) structure using concrete spun pile (CSP) is frequently constructed for highway or railway infrastructures in Indonesia. However, some previous studies showed that spun piles have low energy dissipation and ductility. Therefore, spun pile application as bridge piers, particularly in high seismic locations such as Indonesia, needs additional consideration. The response modification factor (R) in the SOP elastic seismic design needs to be carefully considered since this parameter reflects the ability of the structure to dissipate energy through inelastic behavior. The work discussed in this paper primarily concerns the evaluation of the R-value based on the Indonesia seismic bridge design code, SNI 2833-2016, which is applied to SOP seismic design. The study provided an alternative reference for engineers in the seismic design of a SOP structure. Preliminary elastic design of SOP structures demonstrated that the number of piles and structural flexibility is significantly affected by the R-values consideration. In addition, the pinching hysteresis captured from the nonlinear dynamic analysis results emphasized the limited capability of an SOP structure in dissipating energy under seismic excitation. Moreover, the spun pile concrete material, especially in the pile-to-pile head connection, was observed to have an earlier failure. This study strongly suggested using an R-value of 1.5 to achieve a high seismic performance SOP structure with little need for aftershock retrofitting, even though this would necessitate much more spun piles. However, some further research could be conducted to develop the high seismic performance but economical design of SOP structures.
References
M. Munir and Y. A. Yakin. 2018. Evaluation of Deformation and Stability of Slab Pile Structures on Peat Soil (in Indonesian). RekaRacana: Jurnal Teknil Sipil. 4(3) : 105-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26760/rekaracana.v4i3.105
G. Benzoni, A. M. Budek, and M. J. N. Priestley. 1997. Experimental Investigation of Ductility of In-Ground Hinges in Solid and Hollow Prestressed Piles. Califorina: University of California, San Diego.
Z. Yang, G. Li, W. Wang, and Y. Lv. 2018. Study on the Flexural Performance of Prestressed High Strength Concrete Pile. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering. 22(10) : 4073-4082. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-018-1811-y
A. F. Setiawan, M. F. Darmawan, S. Ismanti, M. Sunarso, and G. M. Adityawarman. 2019. Numerical model for investigating seismic performance of Prestressed Hollow Concrete (PHC) piles with Fiber section element. in 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Disaster Mitigation. 1-9.
W. Pawirodikromo. 2012. Engineering Seismology & Earthquake Engineering (in Indonesian) 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
M. L. Marsh, I. G. Buckle, R. A. Imbsen, and E. Kavazanjain. 2014. LRFD Seismic Analysis and Design of Bridges. Washington DC: FHWA.
M. Mahmoudi and M. Zaree. 2010. Evaluating response modification factors of concentrically braced steel frames. Journal of Constructional Steel Research. 66(10): 1196-1204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.04.004
D. M. Jasin. 2018. Techncial Design of Pile Slab Bridge (in Indonesian).
D. Putri and T. S. Purwanto. 2018. Design of slab on pile bridge on the Balikpapan Samarinda toll road project segment 1 (in Indoensian). Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro.
ASCE and COPRI. 2014. ACI 61-14 Seismic Design of Piers and Wharves. Virginia: ASCE. Available: www.asce.org/pubs
M. Berliani, Mujiman, and Djuwadi. 2021. Evaluation Experimental of the Dynamic Wharf Structure: A Study Case at Nabire Port, Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar of Science and Applied Technology. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.211106.044
R. R. Foltz, J. M. LaFave, and D. Lee. 2022. Seismic performance of a structural concrete pile-wharf connection before and after retrofit. Structures. 38: 874-894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.02.042
L. Su, H. P. Wan, J. Lu, X. Ling, A. Elgamal, and A. K. Arulmoli. 2021. Seismic performance evaluation of a pile-supported wharf system at two seismic hazard levels. Ocean Engineering. 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108333
L. Su et al. 2019. Seismic fragility analysis of pile-supported wharves with the influence of soil permeability. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 122: 211-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.04.003
L. Su et al. 2020. Seismic performance assessment of a pile-supported wharf retrofitted with different slope strengthening strategies. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105903
M. Souri, A. Khosravifar, S. Dickenson, N. McCullough, and S. Schlechter. 2023. Numerical modeling of a pile-supported wharf subjected to liquefaction-induced lateral ground deformations. Computers and Geotechnics. 154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.105117
L. Su, H. P. Wan, J. Lu, X. Ling, A. Elgamal, and A. K. Arulmoli. 2021. Seismic performance evaluation of a pile-supported wharf system at two seismic hazard levels. Ocean Engineering. 219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108333
S. M. Oktavina, H. A. Shiddiq, R. M. Hutabarat, J. Ramli, and D. I. Imran. 2022. Performance Analysis of Slab on Pile Bridge in Special Soil in Semarang using Nonlinear Static Procedure (in Indonesian). In HAKI Annual Seminar.
M.F. Darmawan. 2022. Seismic Performance Investigation of Pile Supported Slab Viaduct Structure Braced With Shear Panel Damper. Master Thesis. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada
Y. Haroki, A. Awaludin, H. Priyosulistyo, A. F. Setiawan, and I. Satyarno. 2023. Seismic Performance Comparison of Simply Supported Hollow Slab on Pile Group Structure with Different Operational Category and Shear Panel Damper Application. Civil Engineering Dimension. 25(1): 10-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9744/ced.25.1.10-19
C. Irawan, R. Djamaluddin, I. G. P. Raka, and P. Suprobo. 2018. Confinement Behavior of Spun Pile using Low Amount of Spiral Reinforcement - an Experimental Study. International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology. 8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.8.2.4343
M. T. Davisson and K. E. Robinson. 1965. Bending and Buckling of Partially Embedded Piles. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference of ISSMGE. 243-246.
BSNI. 2016. SNI 2833:2016 Indonesia Seismic Design Bridge Code (in Indonesian). Jakarta: BSN.
FEMA. NEHRP Recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. Building Seismic Safety Council. 2:388.
B. Sunardi. 2015. Synthetic Ground Acceleration in Yogyakarta City Based on Earthquake Hazard Deaggregation. Jurnal Lingkungan dan Bencana Geologi. 6 : 211-228.
BSNI. 2020. SNI 8899:2020 Procedures for ground motion selection and modification earthquake resistant buildings design (in Indonesian). Jakarta: BSN.
S. Mazzoni, F. McKenna, M. H. Scott, and G. L. Fenves. 2006. OpenSees command language manual. California: University of California, Berkeley.
ASDEA. 2021. User Manual - Scientific Toolkit for OpenSees. Pescara: ASDEA.
M. F. Darmawan, A. S. Fajar, I. Satyarno, A. Awaludin, and B. A. Yogatama. 2022. Seismic Performance Comparison of Pile Supported Slab Viaduct with PHC Pile and RC Bored Pile in South Part of Java Island. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Springer. 719-734. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7924-7_47
